Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Homosexuality in women does not negate the rationality of what I have said. I object to their practice on the basis that its anti biblical, this does not negate anything that I have previously stated and your objection is therefore moot. Homosexual men who do not have HIV again does not negate the argument for those that do and its ludicrous to thi ...[text shortened]... ational reasons. That you do not accept the reasons does not make them irrational or illogical.
This is what you actually wrote:
Actually I have provided rational reasons why I am against the practice of homosexuality. These range from having the highest ever recorded figures for HIV among homosexual males in the UK indicating to me that the practice is essentially destructive to an examination of the physiology of the human body leading me to the conclusion that its unnatural. These are valid and rational reasons. There is nothing irrational about them.
You can try to dance around it all you want. The fact is that to be "against the practice of homosexuality" and draw the conclusion that "it's unnatural" based on what you wrote doesn't logically follow. You can pretend that it does, but it doesn't. It's what bigots do. It's what you do. It is what it is.
You can also try to hide behind the belief that it is "anti Biblical", but that doesn't make it rational either. Just as the KKK hiding behind the belief that the mixing of races is "anti Biblical" doesn't make it rational.
The fact is that all you and the KKK have are YOUR interpretations of the Bible. There are other segments of Christianity that interpret the Bible very differently and hold very different beliefs from you and the KKK.
The fact is that the Bible, being what it is, is widely open to interpretation. There have long been segments of Christianity that have used the Bible as a weapon in furthering racism, xenophobia, sexism, homophobia, etc. That people believe that the Bible supports their irrational bigotry, does not in any way make that bigotry rational in and of itself.