Go back
Chris Krebs is a lying creep!

Chris Krebs is a lying creep!

Debates


@kevcvs57 said
Have you actually read your own link? It states categorically that no fraud took place, maybe you should get an interpreter to proof read them before you post them as supporting your stance.
Who is "it"?

I read the link and I didn't notice that at all.
Are you making it up? What is the exact quote?

Vote Up
Vote Down


The post that was quoted here has been removed
be careful…

The quotes were correct and No1 just beat me to this.

Please try to do a fundamental fact check before accusing anybody of lies. I will alert your post.


@metal-brain said
Who is "it"?

I read the link and I didn't notice that at all.
Are you making it up? What is the exact quote?
“It”refers to the whole article, you know, the one you posted as evidence of voter fraud.


@kevcvs57 said
“It”refers to the whole article, you know, the one you posted as evidence of voter fraud.
Then surely you can post a quote, right?

1 edit

@metal-brain said
Then surely you can post a quote, right?
You’ve already had a quote by another poster and you called him a liar. So why don’t you post the section from your article that claims voter fraud. Or you could just keep lying your face off.


@kevcvs57 said
You’ve already had a quote by another poster and you called him a liar. So why don’t you post the section from your article that claims voter fraud. Or you could just keep lying your face off.
Quoting a liar does not equate to proof. Apparently you are promoting liars to subvert the truth.


@Metal-Brain
So I imagine you are laughing your ass off over the length of these threads now, since you clearly don't care about such pesky details as TRUTH.


@no1marauder said
Your own article shows no votes were "flipped". Here are all statements refuting previous false claims by you that you have not abandoned:

"But they said any such errors in any county would be caught during the canvassing process, before results are declared official, when boards composed of two Democrats and two Republicans compare the numbers on the tapes printed fro ...[text shortened]... urate in Antrim."[/b]


So the question is how many times are you going to keep lying about this.
"Your own article shows no votes were "flipped"."

No, that is NOT true.

"But they said any such errors in any county would be caught during the canvassing process, before results are declared official, when boards composed of two Democrats and two Republicans compare the numbers on the tapes printed from the tabulators to the unofficial results that were reported to the state.:"

We already went over this. There is no safeguard in the canvassing process. You even posted a link proving they would simply "notice". Once again, noticing the obvious is NOT a system. Since this could have happened in other counties with varying population numbers and NOT be noticed there is a real possibility it has happened and has not been "noticed".

"All ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results."

"But the state said the software problem was not related to the Dominion voting equipment. "

Revising numbers does not change the fact that it happened.

"All ballots were properly tabulated. However, the clerk accidentally did not update the software used to collect voting machine data and report unofficial results."

"But the state said the software problem was not related to the Dominion voting equipment. "

Are you claiming all voting machines have that flaw and it could happen with any voting machine other than Dominion?

I NEVER lied. You are doing the lying.

1 edit

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
So I imagine you are laughing your ass off over the length of these threads now, since you clearly don't care about such pesky details as TRUTH.
I was truthful.
I challenge you to find anything I said that is not.

no1 cannot provide an excerpt from the article that says what he claims. The very title to the article says votes were flipped and nothing in that article contradicts that.

Votes were flipped. Flipping them back does not mean it never happened.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
Do you honestly think they will listen?

I voted for Howie Hawkins. I have no loyalty to either major political party. I am simply calling them as I see them. I have no dog in this hunt.
And yet you still cannot shut up about a baseless conspiracy theory.


@suzianne said
And yet you still cannot shut up about a baseless conspiracy theory.
What conspiracy theory?
We are still debating whether or not votes flipped. That is no conspiracy unless the weird belief that 1+1=0 is a conspiracy of denial.


@metal-brain said
"Your own article shows no votes were "flipped"."

No, that is NOT true.

"But they said any such errors in any county would be caught during the canvassing process, before results are declared official, when boards composed of two Democrats and two Republicans compare the numbers on the tapes printed from the tabulators to the unofficial results that were reported to ...[text shortened]... could happen with any voting machine other than Dominion?

I NEVER lied. You are doing the lying.
I have no idea of your level of schooling, but it can't have been very high. Your article says:

"But they said any such errors in any county would be caught during the canvassing process, before results are declared official, when boards composed of two Democrats and two Republicans compare the numbers on the tapes printed from the tabulators to the unofficial results that were reported to the state.:"

Yet astonishingly you keep claiming "There is no safeguard in the canvassing process."

UMM, yes there is and I have repeatedly showed you what it is. So the error could not have happened and not been noticed in other counties contrary to your bizarre insistence that it's a "real possibility".

The rest of the post is so weird and counterfactual that it doesn't deserve comment only ridicule.


@no1marauder said
I have no idea of your level of schooling, but it can't have been very high. Your article says:

"But they said any such errors in any county would be caught during the canvassing process, before results are declared official, when boards composed of two Democrats and two Republicans [b]compare the numbers on the tapes printed from the tabulators to the unofficial resul ...[text shortened]...
The rest of the post is so weird and counterfactual that it doesn't deserve comment only ridicule.
What are you on?
Comparing numbers is how it was caught in the first place.
That is not a safeguard. That is noticing.

You have not demonstrated that what you quoted is describing a failsafe process that would reveal the error.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@metal-brain said
I was truthful.
I challenge you to find anything I said that is not.

no1 cannot provide an excerpt from the article that says what he claims. The very title to the article says votes were flipped and nothing in that article contradicts that.

Votes were flipped. Flipping them back does not mean it never happened.
Please, PLEASE read the article you piosted. Please read it twice. Then excerpt the relevant quotes. Then Digest those. Then try to put Forward a menaingful post (Hint: it could begin with "I erred…"😉.