Originally posted by NimzovichLarsen
So if someone kills someone on tv, a million people see him do it, and he confesses, you are saying there is a 1% chance he didn't do it. Obviously math is not one of your strengths, but neither is thinking. Besides being considered the biggest moron on rhp you now have the distinction of having the dumbest post in the history of rhp. Congrats.
Let's take this one step further then, just to see who the moron is:
1. You believe everything you see on TV?
2. OJ Simpson. If the ball swings one way, do you not reckon it could swing another way?
3. Just because a British prime-minister says there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, doesn't make it so. No matter how much TV coverage he gets, how many intelligence reports he quotes or how many world leaders agree with him.
4. Have a little look at this:
http://usproxy.bbc.com/2/low/uk_news/england/hampshire/8194839.stm
Sean Hodgson pleaded guilty after confessing to brutally raping and murdering someone.
He didn't do it. 30 years later they discovered he could not have raped the women (due to DNA testing).
Re-read that line: HE DID NOT DO IT.
Now, your simplicity and Hollywoodesque bravoure is very touching, but dissing me on suggesting there's always a 1% of innocense is as naieve as killing someone just because YOU are certain they're guilty.
Go and watch COPS or IDOLS and leave thinking to people with triple digit IQ's.