@no1marauder saidMarauder and his ilk are oblivious to the people that are entering our country with the intent to change our country to the way that they are.
I just explained; the SAVE Act was never passed and has nothing to do with the case obviously.
@AverageJoe1 said"The refugees seeking haven in America were poor and disease-ridden. They threatened to take jobs away from Americans and strain welfare budgets. They practiced an alien religion and pledged allegiance to a foreign leader. They were bringing with them crime. They were accused of being rapists.
Marauder and his ilk are oblivious to the people that are entering our country with the intent to change our country to the way that they are.
These undesirables were Irish."
https://www.history.com/articles/when-america-despised-the-irish-the-19th-centurys-refugee-crisis
Every wave of immigration to this country brought out people like you; xenophobes who regarded the immigrants as subhumans who would drag the nation down. My ancestors were predominantly Irish, but similar feelings were vented for the Italians, the Chinese, the Poles, etc. etc. etc. "They'll change the country" the AJs of the time screeched.
And you know what? They were partially right, immigrants did change the country. Without them we wouldn't be the diverse, somewhat weird but fascinating nation we are. How boring the place you want would be with everyone having to think within some narrow confine of human experience! Instead we have many cultures, 350 languages, 370 religions, etc. etc. etc.
I have explained the economic realities of immigration to you many times and won't waste space doing so again. But it's been an engine of growth here, along with bringing in a high percent of entrepreneurs and educated talent that have helped fuel the US' success. And we are a country that still has a worker shortage and a low birth rate, two problems that immigration surely helps alleviate.
I feel almost sorry for someone with such a limited view of this country as you have. Zero sum games are not for Americans; we know the People are our greatest resource and strength. Keep out the criminals but those who want to work hard and raise their families should be greeted with open arms.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidThe majority of the people are against illegals
"The refugees seeking haven in America were poor and disease-ridden. They threatened to take jobs away from Americans and strain welfare budgets. They practiced an alien religion and pledged allegiance to a foreign leader. They were bringing with them crime. They were accused of being rapists.
These undesirables were Irish."
https://www.history.com/articles/when-ame ...[text shortened]... criminals but those who want to work hard and raise their families should be greeted with open arms.
@no1marauder saidNow address those just walking in and taking things that belong to legal citizens
"The refugees seeking haven in America were poor and disease-ridden. They threatened to take jobs away from Americans and strain welfare budgets. They practiced an alien religion and pledged allegiance to a foreign leader. They were bringing with them crime. They were accused of being rapists.
These undesirables were Irish."
https://www.history.com/articles/when-ame ...[text shortened]... criminals but those who want to work hard and raise their families should be greeted with open arms.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidRIght, an ASSSHOLE like you trying to tear into a sitting JUDGE.
The SS Act allows disclosure of the information. As you showed in your previous posts. The SS Act names the people the info can be disclosed to…⬇️
“An “authorized person” is “an officer or employee of the United States, an officer or employee of any
State, political subdivision of a State, or agency of a State or political subdivision of a State, and any other person” who has access to such records”
YOU and the judge fail on this.
THE WHOLE POINT of Trump wanting SS data is to be able to further weaponize that data to attack people he considers an enemy .
THAT is why they want the data and we will fight that till that son of a bitch is in fking PRISON where he belongs, maybe Trump and Maxwell can share a cell together, they are SO morally cut out of the same cloth.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidActually more than half think that the present administration is "doing too much" regarding deportations.
The majority of the people are against illegals
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/05/04/about-half-of-americans-continue-to-say-trump-administration-is-doing-too-much-on-deportations/
And you really don't want to look at polls regarding ICE's approval.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWhat "things" are those?
Now address those just walking in and taking things that belong to legal citizens
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAre they?
The majority of the people are against illegals
Gallup asked this question last year:
Please tell me whether you strongly favor, favor, oppose or strongly oppose each of the following proposals.
"Allowing immigrants living in the U.S. illegally the chance to become U.S. citizens if they meet certain requirements over a period of time."
78% said they favored or strongly favored such a policy.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/692522/surge-concern-immigration-abated.aspx
@no1marauder saidWell, try to understand, Mr liberal no-border (country) Marauder
"The refugees seeking haven in America were poor and disease-ridden. They threatened to take jobs away from Americans and strain welfare budgets. They practiced an alien religion and pledged allegiance to a foreign leader. They were bringing with them crime. They were accused of being rapists.
These undesirables were Irish."
https://www.history.com/articles/when-ame ...[text shortened]... criminals but those who want to work hard and raise their families should be greeted with open arms.
I don’t view immigrants as subhuman, nor do I oppose legal immigration. The real question is whether a nation has the right to control the scale, pace, and character of immigration in order to preserve social cohesion, public safety, and its civic culture. (I know you hate that word culture.)
America has always absorbed immigrants, but historically it also expected assimilation. The Irish, Italians, and others largely adopted English, embraced American institutions, and became Americans first. Do you get me so far ?!??
Wanting newcomerss to integrate into our culture and respect our laws isn’t xenophobia; it’s how successful immigration has worked throughout our history.
You say immmihrants changed America for the better. Some certainly have. But that doesn’t prove that unlimited or poorly controlled immigration is always beneficial. Every country has a right to ask how much immigration it can absorb, who should be admitted, and weather newcomers are embracing the country’s values rather than importing the political and social problems they left behind.
We the People (by god) are entitled to care about culture , our identity of our country, and the preservation of its principles. So you are pitiful to discount everything that I just wrote, when you have nothing that you can deny regarding what I have just written.
@AverageJoe1 saidYour the biggest fool on this site along with mott. It's a tie. No 1 wipes the floor with racism.
Bring it. You are a fool.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidJust like a majority of people voted for Trump, eh?
The majority of the people are against illegals
Keep crying 'wolf', little boy.
@AverageJoe1 saidYou mean, 'white values'.
Well, try to understand, Mr liberal no-border (country) Marauder
I don’t view immigrants as subhuman, nor do I oppose legal immigration. The real question is whether a nation has the right to control the scale, pace, and character of immigration in order to preserve social cohesion, public safety, and its civic culture. (I know you hate that word culture.)
America ha ...[text shortened]... thing that I just wrote, when you have nothing that you can deny regarding what I have just written.
Why are you guys always crying about other races coming in 'diluting' the white majority?
"White replacement theory"? Ever hear of it? Of course you have. That's what you're on about right now.
You're sick, that's why.
@AverageJoe1 saidThere's not much I disagree with there except the word "culture". Also your view of history is rather incorrect; there was no requirement that immigrants speak English or learn it for at least the first 150 years of the country's existence. A friend pf mine's grandmother came over from Poland in the 1930s and didn't speak any English when I met her in the late 1960s.
Well, try to understand, Mr liberal no-border (country) Marauder
I don’t view immigrants as subhuman, nor do I oppose legal immigration. The real question is whether a nation has the right to control the scale, pace, and character of immigration in order to preserve social cohesion, public safety, and its civic culture. (I know you hate that word culture.)
America ha ...[text shortened]... thing that I just wrote, when you have nothing that you can deny regarding what I have just written.
I see no reason why immigrants should have to surrender their culture. A country doesn't have a "culture" anyway; groups of people do. Your emphasis on that word without actually defining it sounds like white nationalism, a philosophy I find abhorrent.
It's pretty clear that present policies of forcing out large numbers of productive workers and aggressively discouraging immigration are economically and socially stupid.