@sonhouse saidSonhouse…to which of my posts are you responding to……oh never mind
@AverageJoe1
So you will be TOTALLY happy when it is King Trump and he doesn't even have to proclaim it, it just sneaks up on us. Of COURSE you personally will come out just fine because Trump will know you are a permanent ass kisser.
And that will be AFTER Trump has ruined our thriving economy blaming it on internal traitors, Trump will NEVER take responsibility for ANY of that just like he never took responsibility for his incompetence in 2017.
@AverageJoe1 saidHey ASSSHOLE, how many of these law breakers you bitch about will EVER change the outcome of ANY election, local, state, federal?
You argue that it is OK to break a law. Amazing. ‘Clear’ is the pesky requirement of dating the ballot.
One of you keeps bringing up the effort of Trump to find more Georgia votes ??? TODAY the counters in PA are stealing votes by counting un-dated ballots. They brag about it.
YOU are guilty guilty. Stealing votes Marauder.
@AverageJoe1 saidTHIS QUOTE.
I dot have to rationalize on this point. It is a fact, but yet you will repeat it again. @@@aaaarrrggghhhhh
You apparently don’t know the difference . Ask marauder for a treatise on it. I am just the messenger
But you knew that full well.
@sonhouse saidI don’t get this question. I guess I can only say I do not know.
Hey ASSSHOLE, how many of these law breakers you bitch about will EVER change the outcome of ANY election, local, state, federal?
@AverageJoe1 saidNo I did NOT know, because you do not respond to that post, which clearly says there is a diff in democracy and republicans….you write back about Trump, which had nothing to do with my post
I don’t get this question. I guess I can only say I do not know.
You need to go out and shoot a jackrabbit.
@AverageJoe1 saidThis is the quote I am talking about when you said there these voter law breakers. So tell me how many of them are involved? Are there enough to throw an election?
Why Can He Not?
Can you believe Sue keeps bringing up the PO which has absolutely NOTHING to do with a voter filling in a date? What if voter puts it in a drop box, or doesn’t for that matter.
There is one issue a law is ignored, they count anyway. I will not invite the to THiving dinner! Lawbreakers. They admitted it.
If not, why do you keep bitching about it?
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThe question presumes the BOE broke the law.
What else would you call a board at an official meeting admitting to counting legal ballots?
Stick to the question please, the question does not mention courts or rulings or anything else.
They did not as I've explained to you for 11 pages now. As I responded to Mott on the last page:
"no matter what sloppy reporting says, there was no clear command from the PA Supreme Count that those ballots couldn't be counted, just a stay of a prior order by an appellate court that they had to be counted. That arguably left the matter to the BOE's discretion.
IF the PA Supreme Court had been clearer in their November 1, 2024 Order, the whole mess (concerning a small number of ballots that broke almost evenly anyway https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-transition-news-11-18-24#cm3nfgjb9000b3b6nj3a4r1mp) would have been avoided. "
@no1marauder said“She's not a lawyer”
She's not a lawyer. Her comments were unfortunate, but no matter what sloppy reporting says, there was no clear command from the PA Supreme Count that those ballots couldn't be counted, just a stay of a prior order by an appellate court that they had to be counted. That arguably left the matter to the BOE's discretion.
IF the PA Supreme Court had been cle ...[text shortened]... voter to abide by this meaningless requirement is sufficient to deprive them of their right to vote.
neither are you. ALL msm, the PA supreme court, the board member themself say the law was broken. What kind of idiot are you?
2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidFind me where the PA Supreme Court says a law was broken.
“She's not a lawyer”
neither are you. ALL msm, the PA supreme court, the board member themself say the law was broken. What kind of idiot are you?
Here's the November 18th, 2024 Order: https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/136MM2024pco%20-%20106152930288600382.pdf?cb=1
Two years ago, David McCormick, the Republican who won this year's Senate race in PA, filed a lawsuit arguing that ballots with an undated or incorrectly dated outer envelope should count. https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20220524/171354-286md2022-petitionforreview.pdf
@no1marauder said😂
Find me where the PA Supreme Court says a law was broken.
Here's the November 18th, 2024 Order: https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/136MM2024pco%20-%20106152930288600382.pdf?cb=1
Two years ago, David McCormick, the Republican who won this year's Senate race in PA, filed a lawsuit arguing that ballots with an undated or incorrectly dated outer envelo ...[text shortened]... ld count. https://www.pacourts.us/Storage/media/pdfs/20220524/171354-286md2022-petitionforreview.pdf
dumbass
The PA SC ruled votes without proper markings should not be counted.
The law was broken when the election commisioner said to hell with the law lets count the votes.
I know you will never admit when you are wrong and will shytweasel for days on end.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidIt's been sufficiently explained to you, moron, with the actual Orders of the Court linked to.
😂
dumbass
The PA SC ruled votes without proper markings should not be counted.
The law was broken when the election commisioner said to hell with the law lets count the votes.
I know you will never admit when you are wrong and will shytweasel for days on end.
One of the problems with right wingers of your ilk is that they are sooooooooooo stupid and gullible that they believe whatever propaganda they are fed without question or willingness to check on the facts themselves. And then when the actual facts are presented, they stubbornly insist that the original propaganda shown to be inaccurate MUST be true because ........................................ who knows?
This is a perfect example of such mental limitations.
@no1marauder saidYou want to shytweasel the court explanations.
It's been sufficiently explained to you, moron, with the actual Orders of the Court linked to.
One of the problems with right wingers of your ilk is that they are sooooooooooo stupid and gullible that they believe whatever propaganda they are fed without question or willingness to check on the facts themselves. And then when the actual facts are presented, they stubbor ...[text shortened]... ................................ who knows?
This is a perfect example of such mental limitations.
Its simple…
1- did the PA SC rule to not count the votes?
2- did election comish say to ignore the ruling and count the votes?
answer those truthfully and you will have your answer
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo, not until November 18, 2024.
You want to shytweasel the court explanations.
Its simple…
1- did the PA SC rule to not count the votes?
2- did election comish say to ignore the ruling and count the votes?
answer those truthfully and you will have your answer
No, there was no such ruling until November 18th, 2024 and the BOEs complied with that ruling.
Read the links and Court Orders I provided for further clarification.
@no1marauder saidyou are a fool!
No, not until November 18, 2024.
No, there was no such ruling until November 18th, 2024 and the BOEs complied with that ruling.
Read the links and Court Orders I provided for further clarification.
@sonhouse saidI cannot answer your two questions, which again have nothing to do with this issue. The bitching I am doing is about an appointed elected group of people who blatantly ignore a law, which says certain ballots cannot be counted… And yet they say they are going to count them anyway.
This is the quote I am talking about when you said there these voter law breakers. So tell me how many of them are involved? Are there enough to throw an election?
If not, why do you keep bitching about it?
My 11 year-old grandson, saw the issue immediately and said that they should not count them. Do you think they should count them, when they have been rendered on their face, not dated? What if they were not signed? Do you and marauder think that they should be counted anyway if they were not signed?