Dems pulling out all stops? Hyenas will not abate….

@Mott-The-Hoople said
I just showed where the usps states they do not postmark every piece of mail.

you libs are rediculous

Read it again, fool.

Yes, but every ballot gets a postmark.

We take our jobs very seriously. We take an oath of office too.

I wouldn't be talking about ignorance if I were you.

@AverageJoe1 said
That ‘postmark’ is not the date that the law of counting votes are referring to, you purposely are trying to confuse us, My granny could just scream!! (Her word).
The date is something the voter fills in. You can’t kid a kidder,
Maybe you and No1 should join forces on this one.

And how can you validate that? Say your Granny signs it when she fills it out but doesn't mail it until the day before the deadline?

The USPS is required by law to postmark with the correct date.

@AverageJoe1 said
AAAAAARRRRzeFGGHHH!!!!!

This issue could be your opportunity to shine and you revert to Eisenhowe??!?!?!!

Who's Eisenhowe?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
Its right there in the link I posted

does your world allow denial of facts?

There are facts, and then there are "facts." 😆

@no1marauder said
Fine, putting a correct date on the envelope is meaningless but forgetting to put any date or putting a date outside of the time the ballots were sent out and election day makes you lose your right to vote.

And the compelling government interest supporting this is ........... what exactly?

I myself am not privy to the compelling government interest in creating this rule/law, that it be dated. You seem to want to write about the pros and cons of it being a good law or not, but it is the law. I guess you can discuss executions. Are they good law or bad law?
To discuss whether dating ‘makes sense,’ or not would be, frankly, changing the issue of this thread.
Could it be that this simple issue is too simple for you to grapple with? It is One question.

@Suzianne said
And how can you validate that? Say your Granny signs it when she fills it out but doesn't mail it until the day before the deadline?

The USPS is required by law to postmark with the correct date.

Not the issue. No1 has sucked you into his wake.

@Suzianne said
And how can you validate that? Say your Granny signs it when she fills it out but doesn't mail it until the day before the deadline?

The USPS is required by law to postmark with the correct date.

"The USPS is required by law to postmark with the correct date.'

please show the law

@Suzianne said
Read it again, fool.

Yes, but every ballot gets a postmark.

We take our jobs very seriously. We take an oath of office too.

I wouldn't be talking about ignorance if I were you.

"Despite our best efforts, there will be some return ballots that reach a Delivery Unit without a
postmark. In the rare instances where a ballot arrives at a Delivery Unit after going through
processing and does not have a postmark or a legible postmark, Delivery Unit employees may
not postmark the ballot envelope. This is because the postmark contains the Postal Service’s
official representation of the date on which the Postal Service accepted custody of the
mailpiece, and there is no way for Delivery Units to make that determination at such a late
stage in the process. Applying a postmark with an inaccurate date undermines the integrity of
the postmark and the credibility of the Postal Service."

https://about.usps.com/what/government-services/election-mail/pdf/postmarking-memorandum.pdf

@no1marauder said

"Since I've already showed the BOE's didn't break any law,"
No, you didnt

@Mott-The-Hoople said
"Since I've already showed the BOE's didn't break any law,"
No, you didnt

Of course, I did. And you holding your breath until you turn blue doesn't change that:

The order from the PA Supreme Court stayed the lower court's order that undated and misdated ballots had to be counted but did not expressly declare they couldn't be:

"AND NOW, this 1stday of November, 2024,the Emergency Application for Extraordinary Relief Pending Filing of Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED only to the extent that the Commonwealth Court’s decision docketed at 1305 C.D. 2024 and 1309 C.D. 2024 is stayed and shall not be applied to the November 5, 2024 General Election."

https://law.justia.com/cases/pennsylvania/supreme-court/2024/76-em-2024.html

@AverageJoe1 said
I myself am not privy to the compelling government interest in creating this rule/law, that it be dated. You seem to want to write about the pros and cons of it being a good law or not, but it is the law. I guess you can discuss executions. Are they good law or bad law?
To discuss whether dating ‘makes sense,’ or not would be, frankly, changing the issue of this thr ...[text shortened]... .
Could it be that this simple issue is too simple for you to grapple with? It is One question.

Reread my posts on pages 1 and 2 of the thread and you'll see the BOE's didn't break any law.

So the only issue that remains, which the PA Supreme Court hasn't ruled on yet, is whether an interpretation of the law that an undated or misdated ballot envelope deprives someone of their right to vote is constitutional. And that issue requires you to answer the question you keep dodging:

What "compelling governmental interest" requiring a date that doesn't matter on an envelope serves.

@no1marauder said
Reread my posts on pages 1 and 2 of the thread and you'll see the BOE's didn't break any law.

So the only issue that remains, which the PA Supreme Court hasn't ruled on yet, is whether an interpretation of the law that an undated or misdated ballot envelope deprives someone of their right to vote is constitutional. And that issue requires you to answer the question yo ...[text shortened]...
What "compelling governmental interest" requiring a date that doesn't matter on an envelope serves.

you are laughable

@no1marauder said
Reread my posts on pages 1 and 2 of the thread and you'll see the BOE's didn't break any law.

So the only issue that remains, which the PA Supreme Court hasn't ruled on yet, is whether an interpretation of the law that an undated or misdated ballot envelope deprives someone of their right to vote is constitutional. And that issue requires you to answer the question yo ...[text shortened]...
What "compelling governmental interest" requiring a date that doesn't matter on an envelope serves.

OK, so u are arguing before the court for BOE, they broke a law and are in jail. You and the Southern Legal Society are trying to have the law changed, moved, whatever.
Meanwhile, they have no rights to get out of jail. Why? Tell us why they are in jail. Even the jailer thinks the law is not fair. He wants to let them out. Why can he not.?

@AverageJoe1 said
OK, so u are arguing before the court for BOE, they broke a law and are in jail. You and the Southern Legal Society are trying to have the law changed, moved, whatever.
Meanwhile, they have no rights to get out of jail. Why? Tell us why they are in jail. Even the jailer thinks the law is not fair. He wants to let them out. Why can he not.?

How many times does it have to be explained to you?

Read the links which include the court decisions. The BOE's did not break any laws.