@metal-brain saidNo. Twice.
So let me get this straight.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said
@Shallow-Blue
So let me get this straight.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said they wanted to reduce the population and funded an anti fertility vaccine intended for "mass distribution" to accomplish that goal you are saying they did not follow through with their "intent" for whatever reason you are unaware of.
Is that about it?
@metal-brain saidNo, and no.
@Shallow-Blue
So let me get this straight.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said
You really are stubborn in your stupidity, aren't you?
@Shallow-Blue
Are you claiming the Rockefellers funded something they had no intention of using?
Proving intent is easy. They funded it. Assuming they followed through with their intent is not paranoid. People don't usually spend money on things they do not intend to use. If you think they do you are a nut in denial.
https://newsghana.com.gh/rockefeller-foundation-admitted-funding-developing-anti-fertility-vaccines-intended-for-mass-scale-distribution/
John D. Rockefeller 3rd founded the population council in 1952.
https://www.rbf.org/about/our-history/timeline/population-council
@metal-brain saidJust no. Just give up already. Your silly agitprop is just not credible. You're achieving nothing here, or anywhere.
@Shallow-Blue
Are you claiming the Rockefellers funded something they had no intention of using?
@shallow-blue saidSo you are saying they had every intention of using anti fertility vaccines.
Just no. Just give up already. Your silly agitprop is just not credible. You're achieving nothing here, or anywhere.
Thanks for confirming everything I said. People don't spend a lot of money on things they do not intend on using.
Now we know why the world population is decreasing at an alarming rate.
On the upside, your sperm count is so low you will not have to worry about child support. You were a good little lab rat and volunteered to be tested on.
@shallow-blue saidAnd the WEF is just joking when they say the planet does not need most of us?
Just no. Just give up already. Your silly agitprop is just not credible. You're achieving nothing here, or anywhere.
I am still waiting for the punch line.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/world-economic-forum-adviser-claims-the-planet-no-longer-needs-the-vast-majority-of-the-population/
@athousandyoung saidThat is not true. That is not what an anti fertility vaccine is for. It is to prevent reproduction. From that same link:
The Indian anti-fertility vaccines are intended to treat men with prostate cancer and not for any mass distribution:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate
Anti-GnRH vaccine would be tried in patients of carcinoma of the prostate.
"Immunization with GnRH resulted in decreased testicular size, drop of testosterone levels, and marked atrophy of the prostate."
Atrophy is the reduction in size of a body part, cell, organ, or tissue after attaining its normal mature growth. It can be caused by mutations, poor nourishment, poor circulation, loss of hormonal support, loss of nerve supply to the target organ, excessive amount of apoptosis of cells, disuse or lack of exercise, or disease intrinsic to the tissue itself.
@Shallow-Blue
Here’s a fraction of the 20-something different ways Pfizer admits the mRNA jab can dysregulate or affect women’s reproductive health:
Heavy menstrual bleeding – 27,685 cases
Menstrual disorder (pain, heavy bleeding, or absence of menstruation) – 22,145 cases
Menstruation irregular (irregular cycle lengths) – 15,083 cases
Menstruation delayed – 13,989 cases
Dysmennorhea (pain during menstruation) – 13,904 cases
Intermenstrual bleeding (bleeding in between periods) – 12,424 cases
Amenorrhea (absence of period) – 11,363 cases
Polymenorrhea (multiple periods) – 9,546 cases
Vaginal hemorrhage (excessive bleeding of the female reproductive system) – 4,699 cases.
Oligomenorrhea (infrequent menstrual periods) – 3,437 cases
https://dailyclout.io/dr-naomi-wolf-uncovers-pfizers-depopulation-agenda-as-evidenced-by-its-own-documents/
@shallow-blue saidThe trend has occurred over 40 years this article says.
Just no. Just give up already. Your silly agitprop is just not credible. You're achieving nothing here, or anywhere.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sperm-count-dropping-in-western-world/?fbclid=IwAR3p6s9XYHpWKFZPVfhJGLk5wnPVxnRAOeB7IUVZJhYjy8iRx5g1kGr6_pU
Do the math. This is 2023 and the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 are how many years apart? Over 40 years.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/99th-congress/house-bill/5546
@divegeester saidI just stunbled on this thread, I saw above where MB I think was reporting that billionaires are trying to depopulate?
The only conspiracy I see here is an attempt to get morons like you to subscribe to the WSJ in order get past the paywall to read the “evidence” in their article about a report published somewhere else (but conveniently not linked) about a secret meeting at a secret place with a secret agenda to control the world population by people who can’t even keep their secret meeti ...[text shortened]... ithout the opinions of entire delegate group being published in “Moron Weekly” by the likes of you.
Might I submit that Biden is doing the exact thing in reverse for the nefarious reasons of becoming a one-party (Dem) country? He has invited aliens to come in and vote. I think I said that right? Did I say that right?
So, let us put Biden and the Billionaires in the same Club.
Y'all are so clueless. Sonhouse has more sense than you do.