1 edit
@athousandyoung saidI agree, so what are infertility vaccines for if all we have to do is lift people out of poverty to reduce the population? Are the Rockefellers and Bill Gates too cheap to do it the ethical way?
It’s a well known observed fact that child mortality and fertility in a population are correlated. When child mortality goes down so does the rate of childbirth.
@metal-brain saidThere is no such vaccine you paranoid nut
I agree, so what are infertility vaccines for if all we have to do is lift people out of poverty to reduce the population? Are the Rockefellers and Bill Gates too cheap to do it the ethical way?
1 edit
@athousandyoung saidYes there is. I already proved it. See the links below. The Rockefellers funded it's creation. It exists.
There is no such vaccine you paranoid nut
Are you claiming the Rockefellers funded something they had no intention of using?
Proving intent is easy. They funded it. Assuming they followed through with their intent is not paranoid. People don't usually spend money on things they do not intend to use. If you think they do you are a nut in denial.
https://newsghana.com.gh/rockefeller-foundation-admitted-funding-developing-anti-fertility-vaccines-intended-for-mass-scale-distribution/
John D. Rockefeller 3rd founded the population council in 1952.
https://www.rbf.org/about/our-history/timeline/population-council
@metal-brain saidI read the links and they don't prove what you claim.
Yes there is. I already proved it. See the links below. The Rockefellers funded it's creation. It exists.
Are you claiming the Rockefellers funded something they had no intention of using?
Proving intent is easy. They funded it. Assuming they followed through with their intent is not paranoid. People don't usually spend money on things they do not intend to use. If yo ...[text shortened]... the population council in 1952.
https://www.rbf.org/about/our-history/timeline/population-council
1 edit
@athousandyoung saidYou said there is no such vaccine. You are wrong. It exists.
I read the links and they don't prove what you claim.
Not only did the Rockefellers fund the creation of them, but so did India. They have a lot of people over there.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
Are you claiming anti fertility vaccines exist but were never used? there are allegations that they were used.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u/
Here is a government website. Are they paranoid nuts too? LOL!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
@metal-brain saidYou referred to a vaccine intended for mass distribution. No such vaccine exists. The highly spun article that made this claim misused the phrase "mass distribution" which was referring to the Pill and claimed it was referring to vaccines. Stop using these highly "interpreted" articles for your sources.
You said there is no such vaccine. You are wrong. It exists.
Not only did the Rockefellers fund the creation of them, but so did India. They have a lot of people over there.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
Are you claiming anti fertility vaccines exist but were never used? there are allegations that they were used.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-ma ...[text shortened]... a government website. Are they paranoid nuts too? LOL!
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
Why aren't there any authors for this article you link to?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
No authors listed
A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations.
Don't use articles without authors which don't even demonstrate the truth of the claims within as evidence for those claims. In addition, anti-fertility drugs of course exist, and cross contamination can occur. Such contamination, if it is true does not make them anti fertility vaccines nor does it imply such contamination occurred by the manufacturers of the vaccine.
The Indian anti-fertility vaccines are intended to treat men with prostate cancer and not for any mass distribution:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate
Anti-GnRH vaccine would be tried in patients of carcinoma of the prostate.
@athousandyoung said"No such vaccine exists"
You referred to a vaccine intended for mass distribution. No such vaccine exists. The highly spun article that made this claim misused the phrase "mass distribution" which was referring to the Pill and claimed it was referring to vaccines. Stop using these highly "interpreted" articles for your sources.
Why aren't there any authors for this article you link to?
...[text shortened]... ertility vaccines nor does it imply such contamination occurred by the manufacturers of the vaccine.
You don't know that. Mass distribution also has nothing to do with establishing it's existence, although it was obviously intended for mass distribution. Why else put it in a vaccine? To bypass consent is the other reason. Right?
Why was the plan to put the anti fertility drug in a vaccine if they intended consent from those they wanted to cripple their ability to reproduce? If consent was intended it would not be in the form of a vaccine so people would know what they are taking. Right?
Then there is India. They funded an anti fertility vaccine as well. Did you miss that part?
@athousandyoung said"The Indian anti-fertility vaccines are intended to treat men with prostate cancer "
The Indian anti-fertility vaccines are intended to treat men with prostate cancer and not for any mass distribution:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/
A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate
Anti-GnRH vaccine would be tried in patients of carcinoma of the prostate.
How does that work? And why is it in the form of a vaccine? Even if the anti-fertility is useful for treating prostate cancer why is it in the form of a vaccine? An anti-fertility drug cannot be a single purpose treatment? Where the heck does the vaccine part come in? Why is it always dual purpose if it was intended for patient consent?
@athousandyoung saidSo let me get this straight.
You referred to a vaccine intended for mass distribution. No such vaccine exists. The highly spun article that made this claim misused the phrase "mass distribution" which was referring to the Pill and claimed it was referring to vaccines. Stop using these highly "interpreted" articles for your sources.
Why aren't there any authors for this article you link to?
...[text shortened]... ertility vaccines nor does it imply such contamination occurred by the manufacturers of the vaccine.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said they wanted to reduce the population and funded an anti fertility vaccine intended for "mass distribution" to accomplish that goal you are saying they did not follow through with their "intent" for whatever reason you are unaware of.
Is that about it?
@metal-brain saidRead your own sources if you want to understand them.
"The Indian anti-fertility vaccines are intended to treat men with prostate cancer "
How does that work? And why is it in the form of a vaccine? Even if the anti-fertility is useful for treating prostate cancer why is it in the form of a vaccine? An anti-fertility drug cannot be a single purpose treatment? Where the heck does the vaccine part come in? Why is it always dual purpose if it was intended for patient consent?
@AThousandYoung
So let me get this straight.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said they wanted to reduce the population and funded an anti fertility vaccine intended for "mass distribution" to accomplish that goal you are saying they did not follow through with their "intent" for whatever reason you are unaware of.
Is that about it?
@metal-brain saidNo, I'm saying there was no anti fertility vaccine intended for mass distribution. Try reading my posts next time.
@AThousandYoung
So let me get this straight.
Even though the Rockefellers openly said they wanted to reduce the population and funded an anti fertility vaccine intended for "mass distribution" to accomplish that goal you are saying they did not follow through with their "intent" for whatever reason you are unaware of.
Is that about it?
@athousandyoung saidIf it was not intended for mass distribution why did they put the anti fertility drug in a vaccine? You seem to be assuming that the anti fertility drug can only be given in a vaccine. Why do you ignore the possibility of it not being in a vaccine?
No, I'm saying there was no anti fertility vaccine intended for mass distribution. Try reading my posts next time.
Why the dual purpose of a vaccine instead of just an infertility shot single purpose? If it is not to sterilize people without them knowing it must be mass distribution. If it is not for mass distribution it must be to sterilize people without their consent. What other possibility is there?
@athousandyoung saidReading doesn't bring comprehension, unfortunately.
Read your own sources if you want to understand them.