@sonhouse saidHere is the first paragraph of that article:
@Suzianne
For MB, Dr. Fauci is the ENEMY not to be trusted because MB thinks he is in cahoots with big Pharma and will therefore be the next big Pharma billionaire because Fauci has some bio stock or other.
Here is the source paper:
https://www.mskcc.org/news/scientists-find-cancer-drivers-hiding-rna-not-dna
Notice she does not say MRMA CAUSES cancer just that if t ...[text shortened]... BTW, we didn't have a single issue with either of the 4 shots we got other than a slightly sore arm.
"Researchers at the Sloan Kettering Institute have found that changes in an information-carrying molecule called messenger RNA can inactivate tumor-suppressing proteins and thereby promote cancer."
I also don't see why she is pointing out RNA instead of DNA in the title of the article. It seems like she is trying to appeal to people's ignorance that RNA is very important. Most scientists think life began with RNA.
Many people naively think only DNA matters.
Here is another excerpt from your link:
"But between DNA and proteins is another layer of information, called messenger RNA (mRNA), which serves as a crucial link between the two. New research suggests that mRNA itself may carry cancer-causing changes. And, because genetic tests don’t usually look at mRNA, those changes have so far gone undetected by cancer doctors."
RNA is very important.
@metal-brain saidYes. RNA is important. So is mRNA.
Here is the first paragraph of that article:
"Researchers at the Sloan Kettering Institute have found that changes in an information-carrying molecule called messenger RNA can inactivate tumor-suppressing proteins and thereby promote cancer."
I also don't see why she is pointing out RNA instead of DNA in the title of the article. It seems like she is trying to appea ...[text shortened]... ook at mRNA, those changes have so far gone undetected by cancer doctors."
RNA is very important.
Absolutely correct.
We all have it. Every virus has it.
To some extent it will have to have an influence on cancers. That would seem, to me, a near certain possibility.
Not exactly sure what that’s got to do with vaccinations though. It would seem that any (m)RNA included in them, would be the same as the (m)RNA that the virusses they’re combatting would have in them.
So whether you catch the virus or the vaccination wouldn’t make any difference.
Now, that one scientist claims something means, scientifically, nothing.
The findings have to be independently found in two other studies to be of serious note.
Take the whole vaccines lead to autism malarkey. One scientist brought that doozie into the world and not only did no other study reach the same conclusion, the original scientist was found to be frauding information.
So, until multiple studies reach the exact same conclusion (and the conclusion isn’t even as shocking as you’re trying to make out), it’s just a single study. And they can be full of errors, miscalculations, coincidence, etc.
So stop worrying, go to bed and get a good night’s sleep. Nobody is out to get you and Dr. Fauci is not Lucifer in disguise.
2 edits
@shavixmir said"Now, that one scientist claims something means, scientifically, nothing.
Yes. RNA is important. So is mRNA.
Absolutely correct.
We all have it. Every virus has it.
To some extent it will have to have an influence on cancers. That would seem, to me, a near certain possibility.
Not exactly sure what that’s got to do with vaccinations though. It would seem that any (m)RNA included in them, would be the same as the (m)RNA that the virusses ...[text shortened]... bed and get a good night’s sleep. Nobody is out to get you and Dr. Fauci is not Lucifer in disguise.
The findings have to be independently found in two other studies to be of serious note."
What is your source of information?
After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website.
https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/01/cdc-quietly-removes-website-headline-claiming-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/
Seems to me you ignore the science that you disagree with and do the opposite when you agree with it. Claiming something is fraudulent science and proving it are two different things.
"So, until multiple studies reach the exact same conclusion (and the conclusion isn’t even as shocking as you’re trying to make out), it’s just a single study. And they can be full of errors, miscalculations, coincidence, etc."
Did you accept that about Hydroxychloroquine? One study said it wasn't safe and the Lancet retracted it. Hydroxychloroquine has been sold over the counter in tropical countries for a long time. It is clearly a safe medication. Do you accept that now?
@metal-brain saidNobody says Hydroxychloroquine if used properly isn’t a safe drug.
"Now, that one scientist claims something means, scientifically, nothing.
The findings have to be independently found in two other studies to be of serious note."
What is your source of information?
After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that ...[text shortened]... nter in tropical countries for a long time. It is clearly a safe medication. Do you accept that now?
It doesn’t help against corona though. Seperate issue.
@shavixmir saidIt helps in the early stages of C19, but not the later stages. That is why it should be available over the counter like it is in malaria prone countries.
Nobody says Hydroxychloroquine if used properly isn’t a safe drug.
It doesn’t help against corona though. Seperate issue.
Not a separate issue. The article that the Lancet published claimed it was not a safe drug. Nobody? Really? Nobody?
It was not true. It was fraudulent science. You hold a double standard though. You choose to believe the fraudulent science that was debunked and the Lancet quietly retracted. The retraction was largely ignored by the corporate news media.
@metal-brain saidIt doesn’t help against corona.
It helps in the early stages of C19, but not the later stages. That is why it should be available over the counter like it is in malaria prone countries.
Not a separate issue. The article that the Lancet published claimed it was not a safe drug. Nobody? Really? Nobody?
It was not true. It was fraudulent science. You hold a double standard though. You choose to believ ...[text shortened]... ed and the Lancet quietly retracted. The retraction was largely ignored by the corporate news media.
And like most drugs which can harm you if you take too much of it, it shouldn’t be sold over the counter.
Get a prescription.
1 edit
@shavixmir saidIt does help, that is why the article in the Lancet was retracted.
It doesn’t help against corona.
And like most drugs which can harm you if you take too much of it, it shouldn’t be sold over the counter.
Get a prescription.
"And like most drugs which can harm you if you take too much of it, it shouldn’t be sold over the counter."
Aspirin and many other over the counter drugs kill people from overdoses. Are you saying aspirin should not be sold over the counter? What about acetaminophen? Bruce Edwards Ivins allegedly died from it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Edwards_Ivins
Because HCQ has to be taken in the early stages of symptoms it should be sold over the counter. If you go to the hospital they will tell you to go home unless you are extremely sick. If you are extremely sick you are in the later stage and HCQ will do nothing for you at that point. Ivermectin is best then.
@metal-brain saidIt doesn’t help against corona.
It does help, that is why the article in the Lancet was retracted.
"And like most drugs which can harm you if you take too much of it, it shouldn’t be sold over the counter."
Aspirin and many other over the counter drugs kill people from overdoses. Are you saying aspirin should not be sold over the counter? What about acetaminophen? Bruce Edwards Ivins allegedly die ...[text shortened]... k you are in the later stage and HCQ will do nothing for you at that point. Ivermectin is best then.