Do we agree on def of Terrorism?

@AverageJoe1 said
You may think ‘comrade’ is a good idea, but I find it a strange choice for an American political convention. ‘Comrade’ has a very strong historical association with communist parties, while the theDemocratic Party is part of the American constitutional system. If you like the word, tell me what you think it conveys that ‘fellow Americans,’ ‘friends,’ or ‘felllow Democrat ...[text shortened]... without claiming that Democrats who use it are therefore commmubists? Start your dance, comrade.

It's nice and friendly and shows solidarity with others. It's like "brother" but more inclusive.

Who cares who started it? Stop being such a petty child.

@no1marauder said
Make up your mind with your stupid hypotheticals:

AJ: The law says hand over the money, legally,

If it's legal it can't be "terrorism" by your own definition.

And, as usual, you're lying about my position on something even while you try to change the subject in your own moronic thread.

If you are in a car, why are ‘on’ a plane?? If you are in a car,, why are on a helicopter?Are you ‘in’ the train, or on the train?

@no1marauder said
It's nice and friendly and shows solidarity with others. It's like "brother" but more inclusive.

Who cares who started it? Stop being such a petty child.

You say ‘who cares who started it?’ I do. Political language matters. If the word is merely supposed to mean friendship and solidarity, why insist on a word with a distinctly political history instead of simply saying ‘friends’? And telling me to stop being a child isn’t an argumentit just avoids the question.