-Removed-That’s the only question and I gave you the answer
They are not applying to EU nations because they’ve been heading to the UK from day one due to linguistic and familial ties or they just prefer the UK.
If they are not applying for citizenship in the EU how can the EU be rejecting?
I’m sure I’ve already given this response perhaps you should read your own op I’m sure it’s advised by the site guidelines
-Removed-There has been a significant change in asylum law since Brexit. When the UK was still in the EU, the rule was that if an asylum seeker was refused asylum in one country, it was game over, no replay; rejected people could not just keep on ‘shopping’ for another EU country to take them until they had exhausted all two dozen or so host countries. But now, with the UK out of the EU, asylum seekers who have been rejected by an EU country may think that they still have a chance to be accepted if they make landfall in the UK.
@divegeester
“ They’ve either travelled through the EU countries and been rejected by the countries they passed through …”
Still lying about this then
-Removed-A question based on a lie to the point of flippancy is not a question it’s a lie but I answered it anyway, you then lied again by claiming that I hadn’t addressed your question based on a lie.
They are not being rejected by EU nations they were always heading to the UK based on a plethora of preferential factors none of which imply that the UK is objectively better than say, Germany, France or the Netherlands who all have their own migrants to deal with.