GOP disapproval hits 59 percent

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Oh boy. It seems you got things rather mixed up.

Its a logical deduction- there's nothing to "mix up".

Originally posted by savage4731
Here are the "geniuses" that vote democrat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgfA2b9YSag&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg98BvqUvCc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=related

Are the following two statements equal?

- Intellectuals tend to vote Democrat.
- People who vote Democrat tend to be intellectuals.

Originally posted by savage4731
Here are the "geniuses" that vote democrat:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgfA2b9YSag&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg98BvqUvCc&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53C2-b8BOLs&feature=related

YouTube clips will not substantiate your assertion that being an intellectual and a liberal is "contradictory" and "bizarre".

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Are the following two statements equal?

- Intellectuals tend to vote Democrat.
- People who vote Democrat tend to be intellectuals.

No.

Which post are you meaning to quote btw?

Originally posted by savage4731
No, you made an assertion that you thought I was wrong which was quickly dismissed in my next post after that.

How can your claim "As education level increased McCain got a greater percentage of the vote" not be wrong when those at the highest educational level voted for Obama at higher percentages than those at the immediately preceding educational level?

Sure, YOU dismissed it, but you are a stubborn, irrational fool.

Originally posted by FMF
YouTube clips will not substantiate your assertion that being an intellectual and a liberal is "contradictory" and "bizarre".

What assertion are you talking about? I stated a fact that democrats are less educated and proved that with data from exit polls. There never was an assertion.

Originally posted by savage4731
I mean you're from where? Indonesia? - I think it says more about you.

Are you claiming you have never read a book or attended a lecture by a liberal intellectual?

Originally posted by savage4731
What assertion are you talking about? I stated a fact that democrats are less educated and proved that with data from exit polls. There never was an assertion.

You "proved" this by exit polls that showed that Obama won 58% of the vote from those with post graduate education?

Originally posted by no1marauder
How can your claim "As education level increased McCain got a greater percentage of the vote" not be wrong when those at the highest educational level voted for Obama at higher percentages than those at the immediately preceding educational level?

Because on all them but one thats true. The one that doesn't is an aberration- i explained all of that a couple of pages back.

Originally posted by savage4731
What assertion are you talking about? I stated a fact that democrats are less educated and proved that with data from exit polls. There never was an assertion.

You made these assertions in a kind of cluster:

"The whole idea of someone being called both intellectual and liberal just seems so contradictory to me. I can't even imagine someone being both. Its bizarre to even think about."

Is it true or false that you cannot imagine there being such a thing as a "liberal intellectual"?

Originally posted by savage4731
Because on all them but one thats true. The one that doesn't is an aberration- i explained all of that a couple of pages back.

A result that is constant since 1992 is an "aberration"?

Originally posted by FMF
Are you claiming you have never read a book or attended a lecture by a liberal intellectual?

I wouldn't consider someone an intellectual if they called themselves a liberal. Just by them saying they're a liberal I know they don't understand economics and are probably shaky in some other areas like history.

I'm not saying I havent but...

Originally posted by no1marauder
A result that is constant since 1992 is an "aberration"?

who said anything about 1992 ?

Originally posted by FMF
You made these assertions in a kind of cluster:

"The whole idea of someone being called both intellectual and liberal just seems so contradictory to me. I can't even imagine someone being both. Its bizarre to even think about."

Is it true or false that you cannot imagine there being such a thing as a "liberal intellectual"?

I meant what I said.

Originally posted by savage4731
I'm not saying I havent but...

Well, have you? Or haven't you? You claim to be well read but how could that be so if you haven't read any books by liberal intellectuals?