Originally posted by xsWhy not? Please don't say because the Constitution says we have a right to bear arms, but is silent on cocaine; our rights predate the Constitution and the Bill of Rights was not supposed to limit our rights to those enumerated (see the Ninth Amendment).
Lol...would that be "the right to bear cocaine"?
Originally posted by DeadBeSwallowednot true,
Guns are designed for one purpose in mind: to kill people.
Yes, people can kill in other ways from other products, but usually, their purpose/science isn't to kill as many ppl as possible as with guns.
Guns can also be used for marksmanship.
And, as people were asking earlier, same sex marriage and drugs and stuff: IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS.
For those in this discussion who aren't americans: keep your nose out of our business. THe last thing we need is you fag europeans telling us what we can and can't do.
For those americans comparing numbers with europe: why the hell would you want to listen to europeans. I am not sure if you noticed, but most guns used to kill people are bought ILLEGALLY anyway. I would rather have a legal gun there to protect myself.
---------------------------------------
.50 cal Desert Eagle: $1200
Grandfather's favorite watch: $3000
Killing the SOB who tried to take it: Priceless.
Originally posted by iamrootDo you think the ONLY rights Americans have are the ones SPECIFICALLY listed in the Constitution?
not true,
Guns can also be used for marksmanship.
And, as people were asking earlier, same sex marriage and drugs and stuff: IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS.
For those in this discussion who aren't americans: keep your nose out of our business. THe last thing we need is you fag europeans telling us what we can and can't do.
...[text shortened]... 200
Grandfather's favorite watch: $3000
Killing the SOB who tried to take it: Priceless.
Originally posted by iamrootRedneck...
not true,
Guns can also be used for marksmanship.
And, as people were asking earlier, same sex marriage and drugs and stuff: IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS.
For those in this discussion who aren't americans: keep your nose out of our business. THe last thing we need is you fag europeans telling us what we can and can't do.
...[text shortened]... 200
Grandfather's favorite watch: $3000
Killing the SOB who tried to take it: Priceless.
Originally posted by iamrootYou're the load your mum should of swallowed you degenerate, racist @rseclown.
fag aussie. How bout you come over to my house. Trespassers will be shot. Survivors will be shot again.
So you need a big bad gun to protect yourself? Figures.....Pansy.
Originally posted by iamrootNot much of an answer, but you don't seem very bright.
no, but they are the ones I will shoot you for, if you try and take them away. if you don't like guns in america, then move to japan!
BTW, I'm against gun control laws in general, but unlike the right wingers who have posted in this thread I have a consistent political philosophy.
Originally posted by WajomaCall it "lefty libertarianism"; a belief in a limited government primarily created to protect fundamental individual rights. Got it from the Framers. However, I don't mind the government protecting people from the vagaries of the economic system which is primarily a state contrivance, so the strict libertarians aren't for me.
like your style No1, what political philosophy is that?
Originally posted by iamrootDo Americans know that the rest of the planet are pissing themselves laughing at their "right to carry guns"?
IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CARRY GUNS.
Nothing will take away the fact that giving humans the "right" to carry leathal weapons is idiotic. No one would disagree with banning the carrying of machetes (sheathed or not), but knives are less dangerous than loaded guns, for obvious reasons. The whole issue is moronic.
Originally posted by no1marauderNo1, Im all for freedom, you say I cant be for freedom if I say we should have the rights to bear arms, but not If gays are allowed to get married
I thought the topic was "freedom" and how the government shouldn't interfere with an individual's? Anyway, you answered my question: you think the government should be able to deny people the right to marry who they please (because of the remote possibility of bizarre future consequences), but not their right to have a gun (ignoring the immediate pos ...[text shortened]... now if you believe people have the right to own crack cocaine like they do to own a gun, though.
you totaly missed what Im getting at, Im for freedom of people to bear arms, Im for freedom of people who wish to be gay, Im for freedom of people who wish to buy drugs
Im againts licence of gay people,. (for reasons already said), Im againts licence of people who wish to marry a gun, and Im againts misuse of drugs
so I call my stand "freedom". Unlike you, at least its consistent.
Originally posted by DeadBeSwallowedYou must not know anyything about Guns if you say that the only purpose is to kill people, have you ever shot a gun? Guns are made for markmenship, (Except military guns which are illegal to own anyway without a permit)
Guns are designed for one purpose in mind: to kill people.
Yes, people can kill in other ways from other products, but usually, their purpose/science isn't to kill as many ppl as possible as with guns.
Originally posted by no1marauderIf you are againts gun control laws, then that gotta be the first thing we ever agreed on,
Not much of an answer, but you don't seem very bright.
BTW, I'm against gun control laws in general, but unlike the right wingers who have posted in this thread I have a consistent political philosophy.
What I dont understand is why your debating on the other side then? is it because you dont want to disagree with your liberal friends?