@mott-the-hoople saidAh so that was a well regulated militia that tried to conduct a coup on Capitol Hill.
organized
you people are making the case for militias, like the dems are prosecuting now.
This is illegal for them to do right?
I cannot wait until the well regulated BLM / Antifa militias come to a town near you.
@mott-the-hoople saidI don’t find it so but I can see why you feel that way. Have you tried employing rational criteria?
using your criteria makes you look foolish doesnt it?
@mott-the-hoople saidRunning before you can walk, never a good idea, watch out for that …oops never mind,
no not yet, just going by yours right now
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@no1marauder saidI seem to recall that both, Hickok and Earp,
Ridiculous.
The Framers never intended any right to be unlimited and various local restrictions on guns were commonplace in1787.
while acting as Peace Officers, routinely disarmed
people that entered their townships. By extrapolation,
chances are that this was a common practice in 'The Old West.'
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
@techsouth saidAnd, of course, even the less intelligent people
At least that would be a better comparison.
Although many people keep their guns at home, where as almost no one owns a car for the purpose of keeping it at home.
realize that, when used as purposed, a motor vehicle
is an instrument of transportation while a firearm, on the
other hand, is an instrument of destruction.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@mott-the-hoople saidYou do realise that Hickock and Earp, for all that they were lionised in gun-toting Republican Hollywood fiction, originally were actual, live people, don't you?
LOL...TV characters jimmi31...LMFAO
Nah. Of course you don't. You probably think "Mott The Hoople" was a real person, and "Jethro Tull" is an invented name.
3 edits
@wajoma saidMott, from that "One Year of Biden" thread at another poster:
This is the debates board, but please confirm; you don't think what you do here is debating.
You can't seriously think the insults and dodges that you, suzi, and sonhouse indulge in is debating, it's a joke right, c'mon man, you're kidding right.
"like them cocks do ya?"---Mott
Your selective outrage is petty. Take it elsewhere.
But have you noticed there's a very select group of people I insult? I don't insult Sh76, despite vehemently disagreeing on some subjects, or TechSouth; and they're both conservatives. They are among the more intelligent conservatives who actually engage in intelligent debate.
AvJoe, Metal Brain, Mott, Dood111...these people do nothing but clog up the forums with racism, conspiracy theories or just flat out misinformation and are completely unwilling to do basic research on topics, instead relying on laughably biased and sketchy sources, if they even use one at all.
Some people flat out deserve nothing but derision; and not because I disagree with them, but because they are objectively worthless posters.
Contrary to your false claim, intelligent debate does take place on this forum. Just not with people like Mott.
@vivify saidbefore I get too far behind, can you please give me my current bill for living in your head...thx, that is all
Mott, from that "One Year of Biden" thread at another poster:
"like them cocks do ya?"---Mott
Your selective outrage is petty. Take it elsewhere.
But have you noticed there's a very select group of people I insult? I don't insult Sh76, despite vehemently disagreeing on some subjects, or TechSouth; and they're both conservatives. They are among the more intelligent ...[text shortened]... your false claim, intelligent debate does take place on this forum. Just not with people like Mott.
@vivify saidFor the terminal dullards the list; vivfiy, sonhouse and suzi was an example only, it was not the full and comprehensive list.
Mott, from that "One Year of Biden" thread at another poster:
"like them cocks do ya?"---Mott
Your selective outrage is petty. Take it elsewhere.
But have you noticed there's a very select group of people I insult? I don't insult Sh76, despite vehemently disagreeing on some subjects, or TechSouth; and they're both conservatives. They are among the more intelligent ...[text shortened]... your false claim, intelligent debate does take place on this forum. Just not with people like Mott.
That you've turned this simple observation into a 'debate' is exactly the point I was making. Bores like you, that take themselves too seriously, who think they're making some kind of public service announcement. The same round and round, the same wet dream about running other peoples lives for them, the same fantasies about forcing your dream feelings on others.