Gun Insurance

@wajoma said
For the terminal dullards the list; vivfiy, sonhouse and suzi was an example only, it was not the full and comprehensive list.

That you've turned this simple observation into a 'debate' is exactly the point I was making. Bores like you, that take themselves too seriously, who think they're making some kind of public service announcement. The same round and round, the same w ...[text shortened]... unning other peoples lives for them, the same fantasies about forcing your dream feelings on others.

You're defending people who think historical figures are fictional TV characters. Your opinion doesn't matter.

@jimm619 said
REAL PEOPLE, MUTT/

you must be really old

@vivify said
Was this an attempt at comedy? Sarcasm? What?

Idiocy?

@vivify said
You're defending people who think historical figures are fictional TV characters. Your opinion doesn't matter.

Who exactly am I defending and how?

Be precise.

@wajoma said
This is the debates board, but please confirm; you don't think what you do here is debating.

You can't seriously think the insults and dodges that you, suzi, and sonhouse indulge in is debating, it's a joke right, c'mon man, you're kidding right.

Hey, why doncha' tell us
how it's done in KIWI LAND?

@wajoma said
Forced insurance is just a scam cooked up between insurance Co's and gooberment. Many countries do not have it and they get along fine. This is one of the great things about travel, it broadens the mind, something vivify is missing. When one travels you'll find in one country they regulate the hell out of X but on issue Y the citizens enjoy freedom, while in the next country ...[text shortened]... and for all to see, and yet vivify still blindly trips over it, metaphorically falling for it again.

Tell us of the firearm
laws in KIWI LAND.

@wajoma said
Who exactly am I defending and how?

Be precise.

You're great at playing dumb. Must be method acting.

You're coming to the rescue of conservatives while exclusively attacking liberals. Stop acting stupid. You know what you're doing.

You got offended at me mocking a guy who says stuff like this:

https://www.redhotpawn.com/board/search.php

"people like you are dumb fuks"
"why do you idiots keep thinking the vaccines stop the spread?"
"like them cocks do ya?"
"do you wear dresses ladyboy?"

And that's just the first page of his post listings. But you're a stereotypical conservative hypocrite who ignores when your kind says these things.

This is why your opinion doesn't matter: you're a worthless hypocrite. That's not an insult, just an objective fact.

@vivify said
You're great at playing dumb. Must be method acting.

You're coming to the rescue of conservatives while exclusively attacking liberals. Stop acting stupid. You know what you're doing.

You got offended at me mocking a guy who says stuff like this:

https://www.redhotpawn.com/board/search.php

"people like you are dumb fuks"
"why do you idiots keep thinking the ...[text shortened]... opinion doesn't matter: you're a worthless hypocrite. That's not an insult, just an objective fact.

You're wrong on so many levels you should be concerned with your own grip on reality. Unless you're the one playing dumb. Uh huh, that's got to be it, because nobody could be that wrong

No one needs 'rescue'. It's every man for himself, I don't look for allies and back-up, my ideas stand on their own. Unless you're projecting something here, do you see yourself as a rescuer at times, it would mesh nicely with my earlier observation that you take yourself wayyyyy to seriously.

Nothing here offends me, nothing even nudges the needle, shag doodys gay incest piss rimming cracks, not a blip.

I don't read every post on every page on every thread, if you're posting for an audience, again you're taking yourself too seriously. This is a time waster while waiting for moves in games.

I am not a conservative.

The previous question, 'Exactly who am I defending and how?" I knew it was a waste of time, I knew you wouldn't answer because you couldn't. Same with your accusation of 'hypocrite' that's just you addicted to the tack tack of your keyboard, it doesn't mean anything, it doesn't make sense, you don't make sense.

@wajoma said
You're wrong on so many levels you should be concerned with your own grip on reality. Unless you're the one playing dumb. Uh huh, that's got to be it, because nobody could be that wrong

No one needs 'rescue'. It's every man for himself, I don't look for allies and back-up, my ideas stand on their own. Unless you're projecting something here, do you see yourself as a rescue ...[text shortened]... e tack tack of your keyboard, it doesn't mean anything, it doesn't make sense, you don't make sense.

Sure, sure but when you gonna' tell
us about the firearm regulations in KIWI LAND?

@wajoma said
The previous question, 'Exactly who am I defending and how?" I knew it was a waste of time, I knew you wouldn't answer because you couldn't.

I named a specific person and the specific type of posters you defend, and you claim I couldn't answer? Even though I provided the post listings of said poster?

Now, if I call you stupid here, is that an insult? Because you're clearly earning that label.

I am not a conservative.

Your posting history says the exact opposite.

@wajoma said
You're wrong on so many levels you should be concerned with your own grip on reality. Unless you're the one playing dumb. Uh huh, that's got to be it, because nobody could be that wrong

No one needs 'rescue'. It's every man for himself, I don't look for allies and back-up, my ideas stand on their own. Unless you're projecting something here, do you see yourself as a rescue ...[text shortened]... e tack tack of your keyboard, it doesn't mean anything, it doesn't make sense, you don't make sense.

Oh, the ever-lovin' irony.

@vivify said
I named a specific person and the specific type of posters you defend, and you claim I couldn't answer? Even though I provided the post listings of said poster?

Now, if I call you stupid here, is that an insult? Because you're clearly earning that label.

I am not a conservative.

Your posting history says the exact opposite.

You posted some quotes and I still have no idea who the mysterious person is that I'm supposedly defending. There was no name mentioned in your post, and I'm not going back through 7 pages trying to align quotes to names.

Here's another lesson for you. If you, for example, denounce cannibalism and you name Geoffrey Dahmer, just because you don't name every other cannibal does not mean you're defending every other cannibal. I gave three examples i.e. yourself, suzi and sonhouse, that does not mean I'm 'defending' anyone else or everyone else.

What you're experiencing is a moment of clarity, that knee jerking is you learning something about yourself you felt singled out but it was you doing the singlying.

My posting history is Libertarian, just because your dumb ass only recognises two political groups, liberal or conservative, does not mean everyone divides into those two groups

Edit: Most of Dahmers victims were black, but he didn't want people to think he was racist or that black people tasted better, he made a point of stating that he just happened to be in a black neighborhood.

@wajoma said
You posted some quotes and I still have no idea who the mysterious person is that I'm supposedly defending. There was no name mentioned in your post, and I'm not going back through 7 pages trying to align quotes to names.

Here's another lesson for you. If you, for example, denounce cannibalism and you name Geoffrey Dahmer, just because you don't name every other cannibal d ...[text shortened]... eople tasted better, he made a point of stating that he just happened to be in a black neighborhood.

“ My posting history is Libertarian, just because your dumb ass only recognises two political groups, liberal or conservative, does not mean everyone divides into those two groups”

What like ‘earl of trumps’ you mean 😂
It must be a just coincidence that libertarians always always end up saying the same pro corporate anti liberal BS as right wing conservatives 😉

@vivify said
I named a specific person and the specific type of posters you defend, and you claim I couldn't answer? Even though I provided the post listings of said poster?

Now, if I call you stupid here, is that an insult? Because you're clearly earning that label.

I am not a conservative.

Your posting history says the exact opposite.

need to get that bill to me vivfly, dont need to get too far behind

@wajoma said
You posted some quotes and I still have no idea who the mysterious person is that I'm supposedly defending. There was no name mentioned in your post, and I'm not going back through 7 pages trying to align quotes to names.

Only *one* page ago you got offended at me attacking Mott. I posted a link to his posting history showing you all the vile things he posts, and you still have no idea who I'm talking about, even though I mentioned him by name in an earlier reply to you.

You've proven you have the cognitive ability on par with a goldfish.

My posting history is Libertarian, just because your dumb ass only recognises two political groups, liberal or conservative

Ooh, who's throwing insults now? Not so high and mighty any more, huh?

Libertarian is not a "group" it's a spectrum. Your credibility declines even further. Ron Paul, who I respect, is a libertarian Republican, and Earl of Trumps, who also claims to be libertarian, is a hard-core Trump-supporting conservative. Your posts have always been conservative.

In one post you've demonstrated you're a hypocrite by only attacking liberals, you've also resorted to insults (something you attacked me for), you demonstrated you can't follow posts made just one page ago, and you've demonstrated don't understand basic principles about your own politic beliefs.

You've proven you're a hypocritical, unintelligent, and therefore worthless poster. Thank you for playing.