Having rights still bewilderingly popular

@suzianne said
The government SHOULD pay. The Supreme Court is guilty of overreach. Roe v Wade was established precedent. It was the law of the land for 50 years. Another Trump mistake that the GOP will already be paying for for decades.

Why should the government pay? There is nothing about search such in the constitution. Why can you liberals not get that in your heads?
Try this simple premise to help you see reason. It is simply not fair for the government to give people money who have abortion matters in their life. I don’t have abortion matters in my life. So it is not logical to give money to those people and not to me. I would lose in that situation. However, if the government had to give a loaf of bread to everyone in the country, that would make more sense. do you see the distinction, Susieann? If my garage door does not work, should I ask the government to pay to fix it? What if you are sitting there looking at this and saying wait a minute, as you don’t have a garage door. So I get a government benefit that you don’t.
You see, the guy who sold me the house that had a defective garage door is the same as a man who impregnated a woman and leaves. I and the woman are stuck with these two problems. Do you want the government to pay just for hers?

@averagejoe1 said
Why should the government pay? There is nothing about search such in the constitution. Why can you liberals not get that in your heads?
Try this simple premise to help you see reason. It is simply not fair for the government to give people money who have abortion matters in their life. I don’t have abortion matters in my life. So it is not logical to give money to th ...[text shortened]... I and the woman are stuck with these two problems. Do you want the government to pay just for hers?

So, why give money to the military?

@shavixmir said
So, why give money to the military?

Because it protects us all. It is a uniform societal matter. Just like roads are a uniform societal matter. You might say, but I don’t have a car. Yes but the road is there to bring a firetruck or ambulance to your house. Everyone needs the roads Whew. I cannot believe y’all haggle about this. Constant fact of life. Please respond your comment to what I am saying here. I am very curious why you cannot make that distinction, as Suzanne could not make the distinction just above.

@suzianne said
Thanks to your policies, there are far more than 40M desperate people in this country.

You are right, except the policies which have added 6M people to the desperate list are not our policies. It is called Biden’s Crisis. Who the hell’s crisis do you think it is?!?!?!
So yeah, it is no longer 40M, it is 46 M. Gettin crowded, Sue. And think how tawdry you will feel when you are helping drive the buses to pick all of these aliens, up to go vote. He will just feel nasty, admit it ….they are not citizens.

@zahlanzi said
don't fall for that. He is lying. except 40 million desperate imaginary americans is a vague statement he keeps bringing up to appear less sociopathic. less of the scumbag he is.

he has no actual policies to help these imaginary americans, he constantly votes for people who do nothing to help these imaginary americans, he stupidly considers this magical number and nobody ...[text shortened]... perate and above which you're living the good life.

He is lying, he doesn't want to help anyone.

Then don’t believe that I want our govt to help them. Are u trying to mess with Susieann by saying we have enough policies to take care of them. We have welfare and all of the many other programs, they even provide for increased payments for people who have more children. It is frankly, too liberal, in my opinion.

@suzianne said
I kinda figured his number was arbitrary and he's not really helping anyone. He's Republican, he'd get thrown out of his country club if he did.

I have been saying it for years at 40 million. I just looked it up, I’m in my car cannot send you the link. It is now 50 million I think we should take care of them. Whew.

@averagejoe1 said
I have been saying it for years at 40 million. I just looked it up, I’m in my car cannot send you the link. It is now 50 million I think we should take care of them. Whew.

So, here it is. It has moved from 40M up to 50M, it probably now factors in the aliens walking our streets. Lord I don't hope they get a peek into our wonderful grocery stores! The swarms would be the end of everything.
But lets talk about abortion.

@averagejoe1 said
Why should the government pay? There is nothing about search such in the constitution. Why can you liberals not get that in your heads?
Try this simple premise to help you see reason. It is simply not fair for the government to give people money who have abortion matters in their life. I don’t have abortion matters in my life. So it is not logical to give money to th ...[text shortened]... I and the woman are stuck with these two problems. Do you want the government to pay just for hers?

Go ahead and ignore everything I've posted in this thread.

@averagejoe1 said
Because it protects us all. It is a uniform societal matter. Just like roads are a uniform societal matter. You might say, but I don’t have a car. Yes but the road is there to bring a firetruck or ambulance to your house. Everyone needs the roads Whew. I cannot believe y’all haggle about this. Constant fact of life. Please respond your comment to what I am saying here. I ...[text shortened]... curious why you cannot make that distinction, as Suzanne could not make the distinction just above.

Tough, just tough.

You supported Trump stealing a SC pick to load the court with anti-RvW fanatics. You will also have to pay for that mistake. Women are already paying dearly for it through the utter loss of body sovereignty. You can't know what that is like. Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of RvW and giving women back their rights. You've all chopped off your foot so you can't come running to anyone claiming you are as deserving as women and that you should get anything to reward you for your crimes against half of the population.

@averagejoe1 said
Why should the government pay? There is nothing about search such in the constitution. Why can you liberals not get that in your heads?
Try this simple premise to help you see reason. It is simply not fair for the government to give people money who have abortion matters in their life. I don’t have abortion matters in my life. So it is not logical to give money to th ...[text shortened]... I and the woman are stuck with these two problems. Do you want the government to pay just for hers?

If the government is going to rip my body sovereignty away from me, then they can pay for my contraceptives. They caused the problem. The least they can do, and I mean the very least, is to supply all women with a method to avoid the penalties involved with avoiding their redneck laws.

@boonon said
Have you read anything that I have wrote? I am FOR contraception. I repeat. I am FOR contraception. I am for safe , protected sex, responsible sex. Who is the hypocrite? The liar?

sometimes that isn't enough

sometimes a couple WANTS to get pregnant, they do, and then they find the horrifying truth that their baby didn't develop a head, that it would die immediately after birth. Abortion is the only solution. Sometimes the woman has an ectopic pregnancy, abortion is the only solution. Sometimes a little girl is raped and she wasn't "responsible" enough to ask her rapist to use condoms, abortion is the only solution.


And sometimes accidents happen and a woman has the right to her own body and she in no way should be forced to give birth to a child she doesn't want.

@suzianne said
Tough, just tough.

You supported Trump stealing a SC pick to load the court with anti-RvW fanatics. You will also have to pay for that mistake. Women are already paying dearly for it through the utter loss of body sovereignty. You can't know what that is like. Americans are overwhelmingly in favor of RvW and giving women back their rights. You've all chopped off your ...[text shortened]... women and that you should get anything to reward you for your crimes against half of the population.

Yes. i supported Trump scotus picks. i am not the only person that did. you support biden as president, some do not. where are we going with this.
if you are saying the justices are wrong picks, please note that they are strict interpreters of the constitution. how can you find fault with that.?
a good issue. with all due respects, i am not going to be writing about abortion any more. you fellers can reach your own conclusions. women could solve it themselves with contraceptions, and good parenting.

@averagejoe1 said
Yes. i supported Trump scotus picks. i am not the only person that did. you support biden as president, some do not. where are we going with this.
if you are saying the justices are wrong picks, please note that they are strict interpreters of the constitution. how can you find fault with that.?
a good issue. with all due respects, i am not going to be writi ...[text shortened]... each your own conclusions. women could solve it themselves with contraceptions, and good parenting.

The Republicans on the Court just did what they were impaneled to do.

@averagejoe1 said
Then don’t believe that I want our govt to help them. Are u trying to mess with Susieann by saying we have enough policies to take care of them. We have welfare and all of the many other programs, they even provide for increased payments for people who have more children. It is frankly, too liberal, in my opinion.

"Then don’t believe that I want our govt to help them"
Thank you, your permission is all i ever wanted in life.

"Are u trying to mess with Susieann by saying we have enough policies to take care of them."
Ah, the dumbly misunderstanding stuff side of you. You see, it's easy because you only have two modes. Either you ignore the point or you misunderstand it

"We have welfare and all of the many other programs, they even provide for increased payments for people who have more children"
Nowhere near enough and the ghouls like you try to gut them all the time.

When the fuk was the last time a republican proposed something that would benefit the people earning less than 100k a year(i am being generous with that number)

"It is frankly, too liberal, in my opinion."
It isn't. It's heartless and ghoulish. You heart the poor, veterans, the elderly, children.

even the fetuses you claim to want to save. You deny women the right to abortion but you don't do anything to help pregnant women who want to have the child. Not one of you maggots proposed healthcare for pregnant women or maternity leave.

So you can take your opinion, stick it in a cactus and then shove that up your rectum

@averagejoe1 said
Because it protects us all. It is a uniform societal matter. Just like roads are a uniform societal matter. You might say, but I don’t have a car. Yes but the road is there to bring a firetruck or ambulance to your house. Everyone needs the roads Whew. I cannot believe y’all haggle about this. Constant fact of life. Please respond your comment to what I am saying here. I ...[text shortened]... curious why you cannot make that distinction, as Suzanne could not make the distinction just above.

Does it say so in your constitution?