Having rights still bewilderingly popular

@suzianne said
No sh**, Sherlock.

Tell that to a-holes like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito and Mike Johnson who even want to ban contraception.

Every time the "BAN ABORTION" BS has been brought up here, I ask, Are you okay with every single woman of childbearing age (this means from puberty to menopause) in this country being provided with contraception? If no, then STFU.

You present yourself as very angry at men. I see plenty of contraception commercials. I see stores filled with condoms. Where and how are women today not able to get contraception? Thus they do not need to get pregnant. Thus they do not need to be the DECIDER of killing a baby.

@averagejoe1 said
Is that you Sonhouse, constantly saying that babies of rape and incest should not, may not, be aborted? I would do the abortion myself, who in the hell would force that? Are you gaslighting , or dog whistling, what is that called.?

Is that you MB? I think you need to turn your feeble intellect to the task of checking out red states that have no exception for rape even the rape of children. Your a gop supporter joe so you need to own it

@boonon said
You present yourself as very angry at men. I see plenty of contraception commercials. I see stores filled with condoms. Where and how are women today not able to get contraception? Thus they do not need to get pregnant. Thus they do not need to be the DECIDER of killing a baby.

No one's killing babies, moron.

I thought I made myself clear.

@wajoma said
There are babies found in dumpsters suzi bamboozle. So it is reasonable to assume very late term abortions do happen, maybe they're a bit harder to identify as humans in the dumpsters once they're been chopped up and vacuumed out, what's left of the maggot anyway, just soup, do you know, or is it more like ground (mince) meat.

No big deal according to you, if a woman choos ...[text shortened]...

Any thoughts on licensed, qualified abortionists or do you believe as I do "THE WOMAN DECIDES"?

This must be a glimpse from "Wajoma-World".

@averagejoe1 said
Is that you Sonhouse, constantly saying that babies of rape and incest should not, may not, be aborted? I would do the abortion myself, who in the hell would force that? Are you gaslighting , or dog whistling, what is that called.?

Who "aborts" a baby already born?

No one.

@jj-adams said
Yeah dem rights are a big deal...unless you like menthol cigarettes, which they are banning.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/[WORD TOO LONG]/ar-AA1jOpRt?
You can kill babies but you can't smoke menthols, because they are bad for you.

Do you understand what demographic smokes the most menthols?

@boonon said
You present yourself as very angry at men. I see plenty of contraception commercials. I see stores filled with condoms. Where and how are women today not able to get contraception? Thus they do not need to get pregnant. Thus they do not need to be the DECIDER of killing a baby.

All due respects, she is a fledgling marxist, thus is trying to have government (you and me) pay for her contraceptions. That is the long and short of it. But she can NEVER justify paying for it. If a girl gets pregnant, she wants to, and we have nothing to do with that or the raising of the baby. I raised my baby.

@averagejoe1 said
All due respects, she is a fledgling marxist, thus is trying to have government (you and me) pay for her contraceptions. That is the long and short of it. But she can NEVER justify paying for it. If a girl gets pregnant, she wants to, and we have nothing to do with that or the raising of the baby. I raised my baby.

Really now?

Feminism flew waaaaaay over your head, eh?

@suzianne said
This must be a glimpse from "Wajoma-World".

If a baby is found in a dumpster has it occurred to you that it was a full term birth born to a mother who was never going to be able to cope with a child.
If the Republican misogynist’s get their way there will be a lot more babies in dumpsters, a lot more neglected children, a lot more child poverty and a lot more dysfunctional adults in about 18 or 20 years.
Yes just some of the joys of Living in a theocracy

@kevcvs57 said
If a baby is found in a dumpster has it occurred to you that it was a full term birth born to a mother who was never going to be able to cope with a child.
If the Republican misogynist’s get their way there will be a lot more babies in dumpsters, a lot more neglected children, a lot more child poverty and a lot more dysfunctional adults in about 18 or 20 years.
Yes just some of the joys of Living in a theocracy

Does anyone detect any reasoning here? I want to say..huh?

@kevcvs57 said
If a baby is found in a dumpster has it occurred to you that it was a full term birth born to a mother who was never going to be able to cope with a child.
If the Republican misogynist’s get their way there will be a lot more babies in dumpsters, a lot more neglected children, a lot more child poverty and a lot more dysfunctional adults in about 18 or 20 years.
Yes just some of the joys of Living in a theocracy

Not the point. suzi screwy dablooey has said late term abortions never happen, that babies can be found in dumpsters means it's is reasonable to assume late term abortions do happen and if they're legal they're bound to increase with abortionists now legally advertising their services and abilities to handle, let's call them; more human baby appearing maggots.

Now back to the question, asked here, I'm thinking for the tenth time.

Wherever the cutoff time is, and since a number of people have refused to define that time we must assume for them there is no cutoff time. Should "A WOMANS CHOICE" extend to engaging the services of an abortionist of "A WOMANS CHOICE"? Or are you advocating for men limiting who can and can't be an abortionist?

Why are some things "A WOMAN"S CHOICE"? and not others? Is this proving to be an inconsistency and thus the reluctance to answer.

@suzianne said
No one's killing babies, moron.

I thought I made myself clear.

Wrong oh you of no brains. An unborn child is a baby, a fetus or a clump of cells as some of your comrades say. You are anything but clear. You need to double your dosage of meds or get off of them completely.

@averagejoe1 said
Amazing. Logical reasoning by a liberal. You are aware, I am sure, that your cohorts say that the 'object is not a baby. Please entertain us conservatives by explaining this to your cohorts that they are wrong to suggest aborting up to the last day.

I do not like talking about abortion. It’s the wrong word for what is really at stake here, and the wrong point at which to apply any legal or logical fulcrum. Abortion is a medical procedure, nothing more. What is really at stake here is a pregnant woman, and that is the point the legal argument should be addressing. Setting a line, such as 6 or 15 weeks, or 5 minutes before birth, is missing the point. But just to clarify, 6 weeks is much too short. Some women’s periods are longer than 6 weeks (my own wife’s have been all over the map for years), so some women won’t know they’re pregnant by the 6th week. Furthermore, some genetic defects are not detectable, by current diagnostic techniques, at 6 weeks; and some of those defects can later prove fatal to the woman, if she does not abort the pregnancy. So let’s stop talking about arbitrary lines or dates, and start talking about the woman whose pregnancy it is, and her health and safety first and foremost. According to WHO statistics, more women die in childbirth every year, world wide, than pregnancies are aborted. If so-called pro-lifers want to vent their self-righteous rage at a grave injustice, let them find out why so many women die in childbirth and do something to alleviate that. No one will resist them, and they will save a lot more lives, than by trying to outlaw abortions.

@moonbus said
I do not like talking about abortion. It’s the wrong word for what is really at stake here, and the wrong point at which to apply any legal or logical fulcrum. Abortion is a medical procedure, nothing more. What is really at stake here is a pregnant woman, and that is the point the legal argument should be addressing. Setting a line, such as 6 or 15 weeks, or 5 minutes before ...[text shortened]... t. No one will resist them, and they will save a lot more lives, than by trying to outlaw abortions.

So we can chalk moonbus up with suzi bamboozle and zahlooney bamboozle:

There should be no line. If a woman decides on a late term abortion then "A WOMANS CHOICE'. Also talk of the form of the thing, the parasite, the maggot is uncomfortable so let's call it a medical procedure, like getting a wart removed is a medical procedure, or a puss filled cyst.

@boonon said
Wrong oh you of no brains. An unborn child is a baby, a fetus or a clump of cells as some of your comrades say. You are anything but clear. You need to double your dosage of meds or get off of them completely.

If she would just answer the question,
Why don't libs answer questions?