@earl-of-trumps saidRelax, princess. The Congress isn't even back in session after the recess yet.
I'd like to see the DoJ hold her feet to the fire. It's a constitutional conundrum. I don't believe Nancy Pelosi has the right to withhold the articles from the Senate.
The house voted in the affirmative. Let's GO Nancy! You're not a dictator, Nancy. You have a job to do as is your sworn duty, to uphold the constitution, Nancy.
@earl-of-trumps saidAnd she chose not to, causing Republicans from Maine to California to have convulsive meltdowns. Funny stuff, really. Who knew you guys were so humorless? Oh, wait, she did.
Pelosi had her chance to submit the articles before the recess, tweedley dumb
@earl-of-trumps saidTell that to Merrick Garland.
I am slowly realizing you are as dumb as a rock. The obstruction is all on Pelosi
Tell that to the dozens of Democrat-sponsored bills on his desk.
Who's not doing his job?
@sonhouse saidRight. The last thing we want is for the man to be able to defend himself in a court of law. Dims are not crazy enough to let any truth come out which is why they will just stick to all of their baseless allegations and be done with it.
@AverageJoe1
Censure is better than Chump pronouncing himself INNOCENT, I TOLD YOU SO.
Trump needs to call for their removal and insist they carry out this charade that they have been engaged in since he was elected because all they have done for the last 3 years is smear his name.
Disgusting.
@suzianne saidI'm not a Republican, honey. But I do know that Pelosi is not a self appointed dictator, she only thinks she is.
And she chose not to, causing Republicans from Maine to California to have convulsive meltdowns. Funny stuff, really. Who knew you guys were so humorless? Oh, wait, she did.
@Earl-of-Trumps
So you don't care Moscow Mitch already said on camera in front of the entire US he us in lockstep with Trump and their defense lawyers. So that will make him a GREAT unbiased judge that he will be sworn into during the actual senate trial.
No big deal the whole trial will be rigged in advance, no amount of evidence will cause 20 rePUTINicans to vote against Trump.
More desperate covering up:
" The Trump administration disclosed on Friday that there were 20 emails between a top aide to President Trump’s acting chief of staff and a colleague at the White House’s Office of Management and Budget discussing the freeze of a congressionally mandated military aid package for Ukraine.
But in response to a court order that it swiftly process those pages in response to a Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, lawsuit filed by The New York Times, the Office of Management and Budget delivered a terse letter saying it would not turn over any of the 40 pages of emails — not even with redactions.
“All 20 documents are being withheld in full,” wrote Dionne Hardy, the office’s Freedom of Information Act officer.
The Times’s information act request sought email messages between Robert Blair, a top aide to Mr. Trump’s acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, and Michael Duffey, an official in the White House’s Office of Management and Budget who was in charge of handling the process for releasing $391 million in weapons and security assistance Congress had appropriated to help Ukraine resist Russian aggression.
In her letter, Ms. Hardy cited exemptions to the Freedom of Information Act for correspondence involving the president’s staff and internal policy deliberations, suggesting that the disclosure of this material would “inhibit the frank and candid exchange of views that is necessary for effective government decision-making.”
David McCraw, a lawyer for The Times, said the newspaper would challenge the blanket withholding of the documents and would ask the judge overseeing the lawsuit, Judge Amy Berman Jackson, to approve an expedited schedule for briefs and arguments given the urgent public interest in learning more about the dispute.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-withholds-20-emails-between-two-trump-aides-on-ukraine-aid/ar-BBYB0h5?li=BBnb7Kz
Translation: the e-mails would almost certainly be incriminating evidence that Trump's reasons for withholding the military aid to Ukraine was based on what the Donald believed was political advantage to himself.
In the end the truth will come out; IF the Senate acquits Trump in a sham trial without evidence and witnesses, Republicans will surely pay a political price for such treachery.