Go back
How to embolden your kids against Socialism!!

How to embolden your kids against Socialism!!

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
But why cannot my question be taken seriously?
If I got Vivify to ask the question, or my cook, would that make a difference.
?
Why didn't you take my question seriously?

1 edit

@averagejoe1 said
Should a hard working well-to-do citizen share, or somehow have to distribute, the money he has to someone that he might not even know?
What do you think taxes do? They're used to help pay for the police protection, roads, military, etc. that you enjoy. If you somehow can't work due to a tragic accident or poor health should the government just leave you do to die?


@shavixmir
A PROPER DEBATE! ! ! !

I can't find a single post anywhere on this forum in which you participated in even the tiniest way with a proper debate! Not a single post, not ever!

You just sit in your little hideaway somewhere and hurl profanity and insults.

Proper debate...LOL! ! !


@liljo said
@shavixmir
A PROPER DEBATE! ! ! !

I can't find a single post anywhere on this forum in which you participated in even the tiniest way with a proper debate! Not a single post, not ever!

You just sit in your little hideaway somewhere and hurl profanity and insults.

Proper debate...LOL! ! !
Be fair. Look at Vivify above who brings up taxes in my scenario of someone who obviously pays his taxes...who is being asked to give someone else money. (to spend, pay his bills....and as a matter of fact, pay his taxes, for god sakes).
Who mentioned taxes, though? Not me. So Vivify once again joins y'all's mob to go hyena-like after AvJoe. Making it murky, indeed. Curious, indeed. Taxes and Roads? Jesus.
You are all scared to give us the only answer to my premise. Oh, well, maybe I am good for entertainment.
Truly, there is a lot of pontificating (Marauder, maybe?) on this forum, and silliness, and everything in between. Sometimes boring. So I am simply trying to put simple quizzes, curious scenarios, to bat around. I sure wish y'all would. No on ever asks me a question, you spend your time posturing. For what ??!

Edit: Profanity? You have me confused with another poster. I detest it.

1 edit

@vivify said
What do you think taxes do? They're used to help pay for the police protection, roads, military, etc. that you enjoy. If you somehow can't work due to a tragic accident or poor health should the government just leave you do to die?
I think you are on the wrong thread, this has nothing to do with the point of this thread. May I phrase it thusly, then. How does the sibling who did not help get paid/money, and why? For what?


@averagejoe1 said
Be fair. Look at Vivify above who brings up taxes in my scenario of someone who obviously pays his taxes...who is being asked to give someone else money. (to spend, pay his bills....and as a matter of fact, pay his taxes, for god sakes).
Who mentioned taxes, though? Not me. So Vivify once again joins y'all's mob to go hyena-like after AvJoe. Making it murky, indeed ...[text shortened]... turing. For what ??!

Edit: Profanity? You have me confused with another poster. I detest it.
Why did you pick me to reply with this? I was replying to Shavixmer's talk of "debate", something he very obviously knows nothing about.

Please don't include me in "yall's mob". All those "likes" you get--those are from me. I'm on YOUR side.


@averagejoe1 said
I think you are on the wrong thread, this has nothing to do with the point of this thread. May I phrase it thusly, then. How does the sibling who did not help get paid/money, and why? For what?
Since capitalist nations also have people who don't want to work your question has no point.

Even so I already answered your question on the first page by pointing out Sweden.


@liljo said
Why did you pick me to reply with this? I was replying to Shavixmer's talk of "debate", something he very obviously knows nothing about.

Please don't include me in "yall's mob". All those "likes" you get--those are from me. I'm on YOUR side.
Mea culpa, I feel like a juggler sometimes with these fellers, overlooked your intent. I got so many enemies, of course I know you are a respected member of the Order of the Sense. How 'bout the irony of Shav saying I hurl profanity and insults. If he were not so emotional when I have him in a corner, he would have thought through that insane comment.
I think they are all in a corner. I have never seen so much dancing in my life. Do you think our Forum will ever win any debate awards?

3 edits

@vivify said
Since capitalist nations also have people who don't want to work your question has no point.

Even so I already answered your question on the first page by pointing out Sweden.
And how about this one. They have actually gone overseas (Sweden) and naming countries to answer the simple little question about some guy in his living room in Hoboken New Jersey. Hahaha it is amazing. Truly. And he think he has answered the question. I just can’t see it in there. Said something about the developed world?!?? Geez. I can change the premise to a home in a village in Nigeria.!!!! The father there tells them to ‘clean up your sleeping mats!” No difference. I really hate winning these threads by default. Note Marauder didn’t venture into a losing battle!


@averagejoe1 said
I'm a man you just met in a bar, Shav. You say to me, "I don't make a lot of money, I'm just not programmed to excel. But that feller over there tells me you are a millionaire . Would you give me some of your money?"
How would dialectic materialism apply to you and me talking in a bar, maybe with a few folks sitting nearby wondering what my response should be, o ...[text shortened]... r this premise. Watching you guys skip over issues is like watching dancers in a minstrel show.
πŸ•ΊπŸ’ƒ
You are constantly talking about giving money to people.
That is not socialism. Capitalism hands money to people too.


@averagejoe1 said
I think you are on the wrong thread, this has nothing to do with the point of this thread. May I phrase it thusly, then. How does the sibling who did not help get paid/money, and why? For what?
There is only one garbage bag to be taken out and two children.
There is only one lawn to be mowed.
The dishwasher washes all the dishes much better than the second child could (this is a reference to automation, because i know you are too stupid to understand)
The parent doesn't want the second child to go without an allowance when it's not his fault the parent doesn't have chores to do.
It's not the second child's fault the parent in your example pays the first child 3 dollars, it's the parent's fault for underpaying the first child then blaming the second child and working the two kids against one another.


@zahlanzi said
There is only one garbage bag to be taken out and two children.
There is only one lawn to be mowed.
The dishwasher washes all the dishes much better than the second child could (this is a reference to automation, because i know you are too stupid to understand)
The parent doesn't want the second child to go without an allowance when it's not his fault the parent doesn't ...[text shortened]... erpaying the first child then blaming the second child and working the two kids against one another.
Re-read the OP. "...and give it to the sibling who Would-Not-Work". The subjects of your post do not fit into that category.
So, you must be writing about something else, Zahlanzi. Really poor debating. Unfounded, silly, irrelevant. But nice that you took a stab at an analogy. And I just read your anti-parenting rant on the Drag Men post. You had a rough up-bringing, did you?
Off to a bad start today, are 'ya? You know why? Because you are an emotional bowl of jelly!!!


@averagejoe1 said
Re-read the OP. "...and give it to the sibling who Would-Not-Work". The subjects of your post do not fit into that category.
So, you must be writing about something else, Zahlanzi. Really poor debating. Unfounded, silly, irrelevant. But nice that you took a stab at an analogy. And I just read your anti-parenting rant on the Drag Men post. You had a rough up-b ...[text shortened]... Off to a bad start today, are 'ya? You know why? Because you are an emotional bowl of jelly!!!
"Re-read the OP. "...and give it to the sibling who Would-Not-Work". "
I don't give a fuk about the garbage Fox News fed you. The number of people who straight up don't want to work are insignificant and always have been. The myth of the welfare queen was idiotic (and the people that believed it more so) and if I were interested in debating made up scenarios i would go to Spirituality.

Most people want to work. Some can't, for whatever reason. Others can, and they still need help. Because for some reason, we as a society have decided someone attending a board meeting for a multibillion dollar company deserves several hundred or thousand times the compensation that a nurse keeping people alive does. Fine, there are differences in what people make. Accepting that must mean the people who drew the short stick (we need those people) must be taken care of by the people who drew longer sticks (millionaires and billionaires).


@zahlanzi said
"Re-read the OP. "...and give it to the sibling who Would-Not-Work". "
I don't give a fuk about the garbage Fox News fed you. The number of people who straight up don't want to work are insignificant and always have been. The myth of the welfare queen was idiotic (and the people that believed it more so) and if I were interested in debating made up scenarios i would go to ...[text shortened]... people) must be taken care of by the people who drew longer sticks (millionaires and billionaires).
Oh, please. Once I posted an analogy, where three guys were in some situation, calling for a decision to be made. That idiot that used to post here, Jimm693, came back with “What if one of the guys had only one arm, or was blind?”
That is what you are doing here. “Some can’t work” ??!? Would you like it if someone skewed your analogy? Obviously , maybe not to you, we have three regular every day siblings. Same makeup.
And where did we mention Fox News ? and your short sticks and board meetings have no place in this simple analogy. Why did you put it there? I would not be surprised if you mentioned one was wearing a blue shirt and one was wearing a red shirt. Absolutely unbelievable . You libs are a real treat.


Mark this down as a thread that was a bit of a task for certain people. Whew. And it was so easy.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.