Go back
If Reagan never started cutting taxes

If Reagan never started cutting taxes

Debates


@kmax87 said
You gave the answer to this in the post I've just quoted.
I guess I can't tell if they're straight up brainwashed or if they know Republicans are the problem but they're just saying otherwise to talk themselves into voting for a Republican... again.


@AverageJoe1 said
Well, be that as it may, maybe do a thread..,,,,,
Meanwhile , in response to this post….

Could A Poor Person ,, how did you say,,..Own Some Media? Could Poor People Own The Media?

Wildgrass ??????
Republicans caused the deficit and y'all can't admit it. That's the point.


@wildgrass said
I guess I can't tell if they're straight up brainwashed or if they know Republicans are the problem but they're just saying otherwise to talk themselves into voting for a Republican... again.
Yes, both parties are guilty, but it is not just the presidents but Congress that really controls the budget. Since Trump is more of a hands-on president, thank God, then I guess the buck stops with him, and if the Republicans have caused a larger deficit, it is because of the modern era, and I guess I could say that the next president being democrat will cause even a larger deficit and we could throw all of this stuff back at you. It gets boring. So let’s say the Republicans probably are the most guilty and move along. Life ain’t perfect.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
Yes, both parties are guilty, but it is not just the presidents but Congress that really controls the budget. Since Trump is more of a hands-on president, thank God, then I guess the buck stops with him, and if the Republicans have caused a larger deficit, it is because of the modern era, and I guess I could say that the next president being democrat will cause even a lar ...[text shortened]... oring. So let’s say the Republicans probably are the most guilty and move along. Life ain’t perfect.
Nah I won't move on. Republicans are not and have not been the party of fiscal responsibility since Reagan. They spend and spend and spend and still think they can cut taxes to please constituents. Democrats come in and try to clean up the mess, only to get criticized for trying, and then Republicans destroy all their efforts anyways in the next voting cycle.

The newest and dumbest plan from Scott Bessent is to "stimulate the economy" with hopes that it'll yield larger tax revenue. But... um.... with what money? You're $2 trillion in deficit already and $40 trillion in debt and you want to spend more money to eat your way out of it? This feels like Republicans have a gambling addiction, but really its just an intense disconnection with reality.


@AverageJoe1 said
didyallgetthisone?
Everyone but you.

As designed.


@wildgrass said
Billionaires own the media and therefore they own the conversation about taxation.
Sad that you had to explain yourself to him.

It's the "Huh? What?" defense. Make your opponent endlessly explain themselves and the original statement gets forgotten.


@AverageJoe1 said
Yes,I did say 'Like they got rid of USAID'. Your buddy Stillhouse seems to want to spend all that money though......don't upset your mates on the Forum!
Getting rid of USAID is going to result in the deaths of 14 million Africans by 2030.

But you go ahead, give all that money to billionaires instead.

I wonder how much Hitler personally profited from killing 6 million Jews?


@Suzianne said
Getting rid of USAID is going to result in the deaths of 14 million Africans by 2030.

But you go ahead, give all that money to billionaires instead.

I wonder how much Hitler personally profited from killing 6 million Jews?
What has and is being done by these countries leaders to fix these issues. Have they been part of the problem or solution and do you really not think that was a low IQ comparison about the Germans.


@Suzianne said
Getting rid of USAID is going to result in the deaths of 14 million Africans by 2030.

But you go ahead, give all that money to billionaires instead.

I wonder how much Hitler personally profited from killing 6 million Jews?
It might end up costing more to US taxpayers without USAID, given the nascent spread of things like screwworm and Ebola and Hantavirus and Monkeypox. Without USAID doctors in the field, the US is less prepared to prevent these deadly disease from spreading to our own shores.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mike69 said
What has and is being done by these countries leaders to fix these issues. Have they been part of the problem or solution and do you really not think that was a low IQ comparison about the Germans.
Fix the issues?

By eliminating the aid, all that's being done is killing people.