Go back
Iran agrees to total cease-fire !

Iran agrees to total cease-fire !

Debates


@Sleepyguy said
Makes sense to me. Talking tough about no nukes for Iran and dropping sanctions if Iran would just play nice removes Israel's argument for regime change. It probably won't work, but he's trying to create the conditions for peace.
I know I'm old, but I remember when high level diplomacy was conducted by notes and secret negotiations not by barely literate ravings on social media.


@no1marauder said
I know I'm old, but I remember when high level diplomacy was conducted by notes and secret negotiations not by barely literate ravings on social media.
You are then FOR secret negotiations? Whew. Not what you were writing last month.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
I know I'm old, but I remember when high level diplomacy was conducted by notes and secret negotiations not by barely literate ravings on social media.
Me too. So what? You're just griping when you should be happy. It looked like we were on a path to another regime change boondoggle in the Middle East with weapons of mass destruction as the excuse, but this time around our President is telling us they don't exist.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Sleepyguy said
Well it would be nice if the US stayed out of it and let them figure it out for themselves, which is what I wish happened 80 years ago.
The US basically did stay out of it 80 years ago. The formation of Israel was supported by the US (and the USSR, by the way), but if you want to "blame" any particular power, it would be the British, who administered the area, allowed the Jews in, and then packed up and left. The US didn't fight Israel's war of independence for it. Nobody did.

As for whether it was "fair," you can debate percentages of population relative to percentages of land control, but the Jews in the area had every bit as much right to self-rule as did the Arabs.

Just because Jews went 1,900 years without a state doesn't mean that had to continue ad infinitum.


@AverageJoe1 said
“Abkvar is riding tonite on a train🎶🎵,..
He can see the rescue lights!!
Trump waving back at hiiiiimmm… x🎵
https://hellorayo.co.uk/magic/entertainment/music/elton-john-outfits


@AverageJoe1 said
Check out rings on Mandami’s fiinnnnngers. Hmmm, maybe a bit flighty?!? We will see soon enough. What is it with you people?
He pushes a rent freeze. I support my family on rental income is he going to not allow me to charge what I want to?!?! Will his govt tell me how to run my business? Is he thus a nazi! What is wrong with you people?
Get a job

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@sh76 said
The US basically did stay out of it 80 years ago. The formation of Israel was supported by the US (and the USSR, by the way), but if you want to "blame" any particular power, it would be the British, who administered the area, allowed the Jews in, and then packed up and left. The US didn't fight Israel's war of independence for it. Nobody did.

As for whether it was "fair," yo ...[text shortened]...
Just because Jews went 1,900 years without a state doesn't mean that had to continue ad infinitum.
No disrespect intended at all, but I'm honestly past caring. I've been following this forum (against my better judgement) for 18 years now. How many people have died over the Israel vs. Palestine conflict during that time? All the arguments and talking points are worn smooth like stones rolling in a river. I just want one side to lose so the world can move on and people will stop killing each other over it.


@sh76 said
The US basically did stay out of it 80 years ago. The formation of Israel was supported by the US (and the USSR, by the way), but if you want to "blame" any particular power, it would be the British, who administered the area, allowed the Jews in, and then packed up and left. The US didn't fight Israel's war of independence for it. Nobody did.

As for whether it was "fair," yo ...[text shortened]...
Just because Jews went 1,900 years without a state doesn't mean that had to continue ad infinitum.
Why are Jews more deserving of a nation state than say Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses ( both of which have similar numbers of adherents worldwide)?


@no1marauder said
Why are Jews more deserving of a nation state than say Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses ( both of which have similar numbers of adherents worldwide)?
The 'Jews' is not a religion. Judaism is the religion, and the Jews [the name really combines the religon and culture] are the people who lived in Palestine before the Arabs. Of course there were the Canaanites and Amalekites etc living there before. Palestine was ruled by a series of Empires, and because of the Zionist movement, around 1890 the Jews started buying property in Palestine. When the British took over in 1915, the Jews contributed to the infrastructural development of Palestine, more than any other group. So the answer is that they deserve more of Palestine which they developed, than any other group including Arabs.


@no1marauder said
Why are Jews more deserving of a nation state than say Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses ( both of which have similar numbers of adherents worldwide)?
Jews are an ethnic group.

Mormons and probably JWs are sects of Anglo Protestants and not only do Anglos dominate the USA and the world in general but they have occupied Britain for 1500 years AND their ancestral homeland of Angeln is still controlled by Anglos as part of the German nation-state.

Mormons and JWs are analogous to Hasidic Jews, not Jews in general, and Hasidim do not have a nation-state of their own.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Why are Jews more deserving of a nation state than say Mormons or Jehovah Witnesses ( both of which have similar numbers of adherents worldwide)?
If the non-Mormons of Utah were unwilling to let the Mormons live in peace and interfered with their self-determination and constantly treated them as second class citizens, they would also be entitled to their own autonomy.


@Rajk999 said
The 'Jews' is not a religion. Judaism is the religion, and the Jews [the name really combines the religon and culture] are the people who lived in Palestine before the Arabs. Of course there were the Canaanites and Amalekites etc living there before. Palestine was ruled by a series of Empires, and because of the Zionist movement, around 1890 the Jews started buying property ...[text shortened]... r is that they deserve more of Palestine which they developed, than any other group including Arabs.
That's total BS as most of your historical claims are. Jews represented less than 10% of Palestine's pre-Balfour population and their ownership of land there was negligible.


@sh76 said
If the non-Mormons of Utah were unwilling to let the Mormons live in peace and interfered with their self-determination and constantly treated them as second class citizens, they would also be entitled to their own autonomy.
The Ute people are the indigenous people of Utah. The Mormons can go back to Mormonia where they came from.

I mean Germany.


@no1marauder said
That's total BS as most of your historical claims are. Jews represented less than 10% of Palestine's pre-Balfour population and their ownership of land there was negligible.
I never gave any %. About 75% of Palestine was state land. It is most of this land that was passed on to the Jews in the UN partition.


@AThousandYoung said
Jews are an ethnic group.

Mormons and probably JWs are sects of Anglo Protestants and not only do Anglos dominate the USA and the world in general but they have occupied Britain for 1500 years AND their ancestral homeland of Angeln is still controlled by Anglos as part of the German nation-state.

Mormons and JWs are analogous to Hasidic Jews, not Jews in general, and Hasidim do not have a nation-state of their own.
Israel's Right to Return Law has no ethnic component.https://www.nbn.org.il/life-in-israel/government-services/rights-and-benefits/the-law-of-return/