Originally posted by SeitseI don't think this is a good thing, but it's not the end of the world certainly. Let's see how Iran enforces this law.
Iranian bloggers have reacted with anger and scorn to a new law
requiring them to register their websites and blogsites with the
authorities.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/syndication/6252737.stm
I wonder what shavedmixer, PurpleMike (a.k.a. 'pops'😉, Moody Maudy
and the other lovers of Iran and their alikes think about this free and
progressist movement of their beloved anti-Israeli axis.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilinteresting ... almost
That's not very responsible jammer. BBQ sauce has a very high sugar content, those Israelis will have teeth as bad as us Brits.
By the way, just a minor point if you start labelling us Brits as Euros I think that plenty of Euros will be upset.
I don't know if you have ever heard of the Eurovision song contest? Its hilarious, its really who is t ...[text shortened]... e a decent song. Amazingly Ireland who have REAL reasons for hating us, sometimes vote for us.
Originally posted by Dace AceIn the typical conservative tactic, when facing difficult issues:
In the typical liberal tactic, when facing difficult issues:
1) Insult you.
2) Change the subject.
3) Blame President Bush, regardless what it is.
I challange you to not respond to what I have written, and post something about Iran!!
1) Insult you.
2) Change the subject.
3) Blame liberals, regardless what it is.
I challange you to not respond to what I have written, and post something about Iran!!
The post that was quoted here has been removedKeep the good fight going!!!
Gradually these idiots will realise their stupidity.
So many of these tin pot despots have been kept in power through the national interest of superpowers.
The list you make is an impressive one. I am not so sure about the fight against Stalin though, I never saw much evidence of socialist oppossition there? I remember vast sections of the socialist party loving Stalin.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilIn the typical liberal tactic, when facing difficult issues:
Keep the good fight going!!!
Gradually these idiots will realise their stupidity.
So many of these tin pot despots have been kept in power through the national interest of superpowers.
The list you make is an impressive one. I am not so sure about the fight against Stalin though, I never saw much evidence of socialist oppossition there? I remember vast sections of the socialist party loving Stalin.
1) Insult you. - Gradually these idiots will realise their stupidity.
2) Change the subject. - The list you make is an impressive one. I am not so sure about the fight against Stalin though, I never saw much evidence of socialist oppossition there? I remember vast sections of the socialist party loving Stalin
3) Blame President Bush, regardless what it is. - So many of these tin pot despots have been kept in power through the national interest of superpowers.
I challange you to post something about Iran!!
Originally posted by petrosianpupilWhich socialist party are you talking about, and at what time? The criticism of Stalin started quite soon after his death within the USSR itself, as shown by Khurschev's speech.
Keep the good fight going!!!
Gradually these idiots will realise their stupidity.
So many of these tin pot despots have been kept in power through the national interest of superpowers.
The list you make is an impressive one. I am not so sure about the fight against Stalin though, I never saw much evidence of socialist oppossition there? I remember vast sections of the socialist party loving Stalin.
Originally posted by Dace AceYou been on the wacky baccy Dan Ace? Changing the subject? I was replying to a point made in the previous post!!!
In the typical liberal tactic, when facing difficult issues:
1) Insult you. - Gradually these idiots will realise their stupidity.
2) Change the subject. - The list you make is an impressive one. I am not so sure about the fight against Stalin though, I never saw much evidence of socialist oppossition there? I remember vast sections of the socialist ...[text shortened]... hrough the national interest of superpowers.
I challange you to post something about Iran!!
Blame Bush regardless!!!! Strange I dunno what made me think of Bush when discussing superpowers interferring. That was a strange illogical leap.
I don't mind posting about Iran its the fact that I am worried my views might be agreed with by certain rednecks who I would not like to be grouped with.
For the record i think:
Iran is a muslim country that suffers from having its religious clerics run the place. It has the typical things that i find revolting about many one party states and the muslim view of women. It is unstable due to the massive imbalance in its population age. Many are young as the older generation were killied by Saddam's armies (encouraged and supported by the US) Due to this and the botched US attempt at controlling Iran with the much hated Shah, it has paranoid anti US tendencies which the rest of the world are slowly catching up with. This hasn't been helped by the countries which it borders, recently being invaded for being part of the "axis of evil". Rumours of Israeli nuclear strikes and US invasion add to this state of worry. Almost certainly it is attempting to become a nuclear power. It faces massive change as the old leaders are struggling to stop the massive changes that are inevitable. Their media is very state controlled and as a result they are reminded daily as to the aggresive policies of Bush and of Israels persecution of the palestinians. Like many of these state controlled societies, the flow of truth will be part of their downfall. Thanks to the stupid policies of Bush, Iran has increasing gained the respect of Arabs and despite it not being an Arab Country, it's influence and support in the middle east has grown massively.
Happy now ace?
Originally posted by wedgehead2Yes but there was a reason Khrushchev's speech was called the"secret speech"
Which socialist party are you talking about, and at what time? The criticism of Stalin started quite soon after his death within the USSR itself, as shown by Khurschev's speech.
I was talking about socialists in Britain, even many labour MP's would avoid criticising mother Russia. To suggest they were leading campaigns against Stalin is a bit much.
Originally posted by petrosianpupilThe Labour party at least the mainstream of it and the leadership has never been closly linked with the Soviet government. You claimed vast sections of the socialist party loved Stalin, when the labour party hasn't for decades been a socialist party, and very few labour party members approved of Stalin, in the last 50 years anyway.
Yes but there was a reason Khrushchev's speech was called the"secret speech"
I was talking about socialists in Britain, even many labour MP's would avoid criticising mother Russia. To suggest they were leading campaigns against Stalin is a bit much.
Originally posted by wedgehead2The left in the UK has, for decades, been divided between those who were generally supportive of the USSR and those who were critical.
The Labour party at least the mainstream of it and the leadership has never been closly linked with the Soviet government. You claimed vast sections of the socialist party loved Stalin, when the labour party hasn't for decades been a socialist party, and very few labour party members approved of Stalin, in the last 50 years anyway.
This can be broken down into the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) and assorted offshoots, and in the other corner, the multiplicity of Trotskyist groups WRP, SWP, People's Front of Judea etc etc. Overly simplistic, but a good approximation.
The Labour party can't really be considered within this equation - they're a different sort of organisation, with all sorts of different types of socialist within it. For example, some of the Militant MPs would be hostile to the USSR, whereas I'm sure some others were more sympathetic.
Originally posted by wedgehead2Thats why I used the past tense!!!!!!
The Labour party at least the mainstream of it and the leadership has never been closly linked with the Soviet government. You claimed vast sections of the socialist party loved Stalin, when the labour party hasn't for decades been a socialist party, and very few labour party members approved of Stalin, in the last 50 years anyway.
The post I was replying to was about socialists fighting dictators, its a bit late fighting them when they are dead!!!!!! I don't understand how you can think I was talking about todays new labour.