@Metal-Brain saidIm sure the British did promise the Arabs land. They got some, but they are greedy bastards and wanted all, and wanted Jews dead. Fatal mistake... dont be greedy., and dont threaten to kill Jews, because you are going to die. You would think they learned that lesson by now, but they are a stupid people.
You are a liar. They stole land. The British promised the Levant to the Palestinians and betrayed them and installed puppet governments in the region. The allied powers were imperialists who dominated their colonies in very brutal ways. One of those mandates from the League of Nations gave Belgium the Congo and Rwanda. Look at what Leopold did.
https://talkafricana.co ...[text shortened]... er nation and we all know which country that is. It is just taboo to bring it up when people should.
@no1marauder saidYes, the Arabs declined and the Jews accepted. Are you saying that the Jews cannot accept? If the Arabs declined, thats their choice, but they declined and started a war with the threat that there will be no Jewish state in Palestine.
As the quotes I showed prove, the UN General Assembly decided to recommend a plan. And they did it through a Resolution which is:
"With the exception of decisions regarding payments to the regular and peacekeeping budgets of the UN, General Assembly resolutions/decisions are not binding for Member States. "
https://ask.un.org/faq/1448
The parties w ...[text shortened]... ecline it. You don't want to know how many UN General Assembly Resolutions Israel is in defiance of.
According to the Geneva Convention, the non-acceptance by the Arabs makes the land assigned to them disputed territory and is up for grabs. Its a simple principle .. the dont want it, so someone else with an interest in it can have it.
@Rajk999 saidThat is another lie. Stop lying about history. There was no two state solution on the able. Never was.
Nakba ...serves them right. There was a 2 state solution on the table. They refused and chose war. They got clobbered, and were chased out of Palestine. Good F..king riddance.
Iran threatened to destroy Israel. Israel is removing their nuclear capability and other weapons. Great .. I love it.
Any more questions?
Trump threatened to bomb Iran.
https://www.reuters.com/world/trump-says-there-will-be-bombing-if-iran-does-not-make-nuclear-deal-2025-03-30/
Then Israel does the bombing and Trump said "we" NOW HAVE 'TOTAL CONTROL' OF SKIES OVER IRAN.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/white-house-seeks-meeting-irans-foreign-minister-iran-eases-punishing-strikes-axios
Where is Trump hiding out at? Doesn't he want to answer questions like who is we and is the USA involved in the war with Iran?
"Iran threatened to destroy Israel. Israel is removing their nuclear capability and other weapons. Great .. I love it.
Any more questions?"
Yes, why do you think Iran threatened to destroy Israel? That was not the literal translation. And why would Iran destroy Israel if Israel did not bomb Iran without being provoked? Iran used to have great relations with Israel when the Shah was in power. Iranians do not hate the common Israeli people.
And what possible incentive would Iran have to nuke Israel? Don't you believe Israel has nukes? Didn't Israel help South Africa get nukes a long time ago?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons
Seems to me that Israel is the real threat to world stability. They sell nuclear secrets to let others get nukes.
@Rajk999 saidThe British promised the Arabs ALL of the land, not some of it. They were promised the whole Arabian peninsula. It was a bitter betrayal. The mandates were to install puppet governments. The Arabs saw through it.
Im sure the British did promise the Arabs land. They got some, but they are greedy bastards and wanted all, and wanted Jews dead. Fatal mistake... dont be greedy., and dont threaten to kill Jews, because you are going to die. You would think they learned that lesson by now, but they are a stupid people.
The Hussein-McMahon correspondence effectively traded British support of an independent Arab state for Arab assistance in opposing the Ottoman Empire.
It was later contradicted by the incompatible terms of the Sykes-Picot Agreement, secretly concluded between Britain and France in May 1916, and Britain’s Balfour Declaration of 1917.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Husayn-McMahon-correspondence
Israel is a puppet nation.
@Metal-Brain saidThe British promised them ALL ? Well, I have no doubt that they could have. But here is the thing... those poor British people did not know who they were dealing with, and over the years they got to know the Arabs in Palestine. I guess they found out the kind of murderous, sleazy, unproductive, lazy bums they were dealing with and decided to give the Jews the lions share of Palestine. Cant say I blame them. I would have done the same.
The British promised the Arabs ALL of the land, not some of it. They were promised the whole Arabian peninsula. It was a bitter betrayal. The mandates were to install puppet governments. The Arabs saw through it.
The Hussein-McMahon correspondence effectively traded British support of an independent Arab state for Arab assistance in opposing the Ottoman Empire.
It w ...[text shortened]... 917.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Husayn-McMahon-correspondence
Israel is a puppet nation.
@Rajk999
Why do you think Iran threatened to destroy Israel? That was not the literal translation. And why would Iran destroy Israel if Israel did not bomb Iran without being provoked? Iran used to have great relations with Israel when the Shah was in power. Iranians do not hate the common Israeli people.
And what possible incentive would Iran have to nuke Israel? Don't you believe Israel has nukes? Didn't Israel help South Africa get nukes a long time ago?
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/may/23/israel-south-africa-nuclear-weapons
Seems to me that Israel is the real threat to world stability. They sell nuclear secrets to let others get nukes.
@Metal-Brain saidThat Iran promised to destroy Israel, is a fact.
@Rajk999
Why do you think Iran threatened to destroy Israel? That was not the literal translation. And why would Iran destroy Israel if Israel did not bomb Iran without being provoked? Iran used to have great relations with Israel when the Shah was in power. Iranians do not hate the common Israeli people.
And what possible incentive would Iran have to nuke Israel? Don ...[text shortened]... hat Israel is the real threat to world stability. They sell nuclear secrets to let others get nukes.
Why do you keep asking stupid questions.
@Rajk999 saidThat's among the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.
Yes, the Arabs declined and the Jews accepted. Are you saying that the Jews cannot accept? If the Arabs declined, thats their choice, but they declined and started a war with the threat that there will be no Jewish state in Palestine.
According to the Geneva Convention, the non-acceptance by the Arabs makes the land assigned to them disputed territory and is up for grabs. Its a simple principle .. the dont want it, so someone else with an interest in it can have it.
No, a minority doesn't get to "accept" something the majority of the People (2/3 of the population in this case) in an area reject.
The Arabs didn't "start a war"; you know by now that the Zionists had been fighting against the Arabs in Palestine and the British (for a while when the Brits were kinda busy with the Nazis) long before the Partition Plan. It's a puzzling thing that you keep repeating such an obvious and knowing falsehood.
There is no such principle in the Geneva Convention or in international law. The majority do not have to accept dictates from outside that dispossess them of the bulk of the land of a country. The Palestinians never said they didn't want their land and you are perfectly aware of that. If someone says "I'll give you $100 for your house" they don't get to forcibly evict you when you turn them down.
Your lies are pretty transparent.
@no1marauder saidThe land did not belong to the Arabs. The land was a British colony, and the UN partitioned it. The Arabs refused and they started the war. There was no reason for the Jews to start a war, as they accepted the deal and started setting up their country. The war was started by the joint army of the surrounding Arab states.
That's among the most ridiculous thing I've ever read.
No, a minority doesn't get to "accept" something the majority of the People (2/3 of the population in this case) in an area reject.
The Arabs didn't "start a war"; you know by now that the Zionists had been fighting against the Arabs in Palestine and the British (for a while when the Brits were kinda busy with t ...[text shortened]... " they don't get to forcibly evict you when you turn them down.
Your lies are pretty transparent.
They got clobbered and were chased out. Poetic justice that is called. To this day they cannot see that its a lost cause. There is no other more stupid nation that the Arabs of Palestine.
Stay tuned for more.... as Gaza is going to get razed and rebullt and taken over by Israel, and may is a couple years West Bank too.
@shavixmir saidEvil supports evil. Islam is an evil diseased religion. Recently a father was publicly hanged in front of his daughter just because of an anti-government social media post. Till his last breath, the father kept smiling while looking into his daughter’s eyes so that she wouldn’t break down. People around the world are disgusted with Iran (except for fanatical Muslims). In Iran, women have their hair cut off just for not wearing a burqa, they are paraded naked, beaten so brutally that they die in hospitals. The culture and traditions of Iran’s fanatic clerical rule insult and exploit women and children. Yeah .. I hope that fool Ayatollah makes the mistake of using his small dick nukes.
With a radical, extremist, racist bully like Israel as a neighbour, who could blame anyone wanting to build a nuclear weapon?
@Rajk999 saidHow many times does it have to be shown to you that Palestine wasn't a "British colony"?
The land did not belong to the Arabs. The land was a British colony, and the UN partitioned it. The Arabs refused and they started the war. There was no reason for the Jews to start a war, as they accepted the deal and started setting up their country. The war was started by the joint army of the surrounding Arab states.
They got clobbered and were chased out. Poetic j ...[text shortened]... is going to get razed and rebullt and taken over by Israel, and may is a couple years West Bank too.
How many times does it have to be shown to you that the UN didn't "Partition" it?
How many times are you going to deny that Zionists were fighting against the Arabs in Palestine and the British army there well before 1948 (including during WWII)?
You're a delusional liar.
@no1marauder saidProof that your opinion on this one point, is wrong, is enough to show that the rest of your opinions are nonsense and biased.
How many times does it have to be shown to you that Palestine wasn't a "British colony"?
How many times does it have to be shown to you that the UN didn't "Partition" it?
How many times are you going to deny that Zionists were fighting against the Arabs in Palestine and the British army there well before 1948 (including during WWII)?
You're a delusional liar.
Palestine as a Mandate Territory 1918 – 1948
Britain applied this business model in Palestine, now a territory independent of the Ottoman Empire. Palestine’s status as a colony is clear. In the debates in the British Parliament, Palestine is referred to throughout as a conquered territory, a colony, and a possession. When demanding that British firms be allowed some concessions for development projects in Palestine, J. Butcher MP stated: “We are in Palestine as a conquering nation and demanded that British workers and manufacturers have a share in the spoils (Hansard, HC Deb 04 July 1922). In defending the award of two major concessions to one Pinhas Rutenberg, Winston Churchill, Colonial Secretary said, “This concession follows in every respect the regular lines of Colonial Office procedure. It has been framed in the Colonial Office in exactly the same manner and spirit as if it related to East Africa, Nigeria, Ceylon or any other of the Crown Colonies” (EGYPT. HC Deb 14 March 1922).
What are the regular lines of Colonial Office procedure? Beginning with the rationale for a colonial presence in a region; colonial subjects needed protection and their assets needed to be held in trust for them. The East Africa Report of 1925 by the Colonial Office put it this way: “During our tour of East Africa we were frequently told by Europeans, officials and unofficials alike, that the African native is a ‘child.’ Without questioning the truth of such a generalisation, it at any rate suggests that the position of the European race ruling in Africa is that of a guardian to a ward, and that our duty is to protect the interests of someone less capable of safeguarding his or her own interests” (Report of the East Africa Commission to the Right Honourable L. S. Amery, M.P., Secretary of State for the Colonies, 1925).
As with other colonies, Palestine had to be made to prosper economically and where possible to cover its own costs. Colonies were required to maintain a reserve fund at the Exchequer, something that the Uganda Protectorate had no trouble doing. Uganda and most of the other colonies balanced her own budget through revenues from Native Poll Tax, an array of commodity taxes and monopolies of the export of those commodities (colonists were exempt from income tax). Ancillary industries such as cotton ginning were prohibited for Africans in Uganda (which later caused political unrest). Indigenous Kenyans were not allowed to grow coffee and other crops considered profitable.
https://africanarguments.org/2023/11/the-colonisation-of-palestine-exhuming-a-british-imperial-crime/#:~:text=Palestine%20as%20a%20Mandate%20Territory,a%20colony%2C%20and%20a%20possession.
@Rajk999 saidRead the Mandate document. The Brits might have run it like a colony, but it was not as that document makes clear (you don't need permission from an international agency to make policy changes in a colony).
Proof that your opinion on this one point, is wrong, is enough to show that the rest of your opinions are nonsense and biased.
[i]Palestine as a Mandate Territory 1918 – 1948
Britain applied this business model in Palestine, now a territory independent of the Ottoman Empire. [b]Palestine’s status as a colony is clear. In the debates in the British Parliament, Palestine is ...[text shortened]... perial-crime/#:~:text=Palestine%20as%20a%20Mandate%20Territory,a%20colony%2C%20and%20a%20possession.