Go back
Israel attacks Iran, air strikes.

Israel attacks Iran, air strikes.

Debates


@AverageJoe1 said
You can’t help but have respect for this cool-under-fire president.
He collects intel situation situation from all these meetings with his staff, assimilating everything in his brain. He invites Iran to the White House. He has not made a final decision.. He is at his finest hour. He will wait until the last possible moment. He’s waiting on how much further Israel is g ...[text shortened]... really doing all of this, I wonder what your position will be then. Be a big guy and eat some Crow.
I told you to stop posting while wasted.


@AverageJoe1 said
You can’t help but have respect for this cool-under-fire president.
He collects intel situation situation from all these meetings with his staff, assimilating everything in his brain. He invites Iran to the White House. He has not made a final decision.. He is at his finest hour. He will wait until the last possible moment. He’s waiting on how much further Israel is g ...[text shortened]... really doing all of this, I wonder what your position will be then. Be a big guy and eat some Crow.
You didn't read my post, Trump gets his advice from FOX NEWS TALKING HEADS.


@no1marauder said
Collaboration with foreign occupiers doesn't morally entitle you to political power once they are gone. Google "Vidkun Quisling" for further details.
It is the UN that partitioned Palestine. ..

**********************************
The United Nations did propose the partition of Palestine. In 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181, which recommended dividing Mandatory Palestine into two independent states—one Jewish and one Arab—with Jerusalem placed under an international regime. This plan was drafted by the UN Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) and called for the termination of the British Mandate, the withdrawal of British forces, and the establishment of boundaries between the two states.

The plan allocated approximately 56 percent of the territory to the Jewish state and about 43 percent to the Arab state, with Jerusalem and its surroundings designated as a separate international zone. The Jewish leadership accepted the plan, while the Arab leadership and surrounding Arab states rejected it outright, leading to conflict and the eventual 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

Thus, the UN did formally propose partitioning Palestine, but the plan was never fully implemented due to Arab rejection and ensuing hostilities.

*********************************

That is what make it legitimate. The Arab rejection means nothing.

1 edit

@Rajk999 said
It is the UN that partitioned Palestine. ..

**********************************
The United Nations did propose the partition of Palestine. In 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181, which recommended dividing Mandatory Palestine into two independent states—one Jewish and one Arab—with Jerusalem placed under an international regime. This plan was drafted by th ...[text shortened]... *****************************

That is what make it legitimate. The Arab rejection means nothing.
I'm not wasting further time with this; the UN made a proposal that they "called upon" the People of Palestine to accept The majority's representatives declined to.

So the Plan had no legal force as I've shown you multiple times.

I won't respond further on this.


@no1marauder said
I'm not wasting further time with this; the UN made a proposal that they "called upon" the People of Palestine to accept The majority's representatives declined to.

So the Plan had no legal force as I've shown you multiple times.

I won't respond further on this.
Please stop wasting you time, especially with this People of Palestine nonsense ... LOL 😀 .. where the hell you dug up that from? There is no people of Palestine. There are Jews and Arabs. The UN together with the British, followed the Mandate and the Balfour Declaration and partitioned THEIR COLONIAL PROPERTY, granting the Jews and Arabs separate portions.

Those who did not accept their portion meant that it became disputed territory, and up for grabs. The Arabs are losers, because they make stupid decisions and they fail because they are driven by hatred and they will never be a progressive people. They have wasted 75 years and trillions of $$$ in fighting a battle that they can never win, and all they experience is death and suffering.

Stop wasting your time.


@sonhouse said
You didn't read my post, Trump gets his advice from FOX NEWS TALKING HEADS.
link


@no1marauder said
I'm not wasting further time with this; the UN made a proposal that they "called upon" the People of Palestine to accept The majority's representatives declined to.

So the Plan had no legal force as I've shown you multiple times.

I won't respond further on this.
Your post about the % of Palestinian land owned by the Arabs is very misleading. Maybe you can check into it and give some more realistic information. In the days of the Ottomans, there was no land deed, and people simply lived on land inherited. The British introduced a land registry and complied the information and regularised people on land inherited. About 75% of Palestine was state lands, about 10% owned by Jews, 12% by Arabs and 3% Foreigners. The Partition Plan of the UN allocated mostly State Lands [from the 75%] to the Jewish portion. Israel did not sit on too much of what is Arab land. So if you are after the truth then this is something worth investigating instead of posting assumptions.


@AverageJoe1 said
link
"During his first administration, there was a well-documented relationship between Donald Trump and several Fox News hosts.
Examples of Fox Hosts' Influence:

Policy and Strategy: Some former administration officials reported that Trump would discuss suggestions from Fox personalities regarding topics such as White House personnel and how to frame the president's message. He even included Sean Hannity and former Fox Business host Lou Dobbs in Oval Office staff meetings.

Jan. 6 Capitol Riot: Text messages shared by the Jan. 6 committee revealed Fox hosts like Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, and Brian Kilmeade sending advice to Trump's chief of staff, Mark Meadows, urging him to get the president to address the situation and ask people to leave the Capitol.

COVID-19 Pandemic: In early 2020, Tucker Carlson reportedly flew to Mar-a-Lago to discuss the seriousness of the coronavirus with Trump.
Appointments in the Second Trump Administration:

High-Profile Roles: In his second administration, Trump has appointed multiple individuals with ties to Fox News to key positions, including Pete Hegseth as Secretary of Defense and Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence.

Significant Presence: Trump has chosen at least 19 former Fox News hosts, journalists, and commentators for senior positions in his second term, with some of these appointments being to prominent roles.
Nature of the Relationship:

Symbiotic Bond: The relationship between Trump and Fox News during his first administration was characterized as a symbiotic bond, with Trump reportedly consulting with hosts on policy matters.

Recruiting Pool: Fox News has been a source of recruitment for the Trump administration, with former employees taking on roles ranging from Cabinet positions to advisory roles.

It's important to note that the relationship between Trump and Fox News has been characterized by some as a "marriage of convenience".

2 edits

@sonhouse said
"During his first administration, there was a well-documented relationship between Donald Trump and several Fox News hosts.
Examples of Fox Hosts' Influence:

Policy and Strategy: Some former administration officials reported that Trump would discuss suggestions from Fox personalities regarding topics such as White House personnel and how to frame the president's message ...[text shortened]... lationship between Trump and Fox News has been characterized by some as a "marriage of convenience".
i would think people who research the news 24/7 would be the first place a person like Trump, with his visionary acumen, would be the people he would talk to, to learn what is happening.
So your being upset about this obvious commendable action of a man to be on top of things,,,,,,,is lost on me. I would do it, too. If you were wanting to know stuff, where would you look??

You use the word 'advice' a lot. Naaa, he was nto looking for advice in my opinion. He thinks for himself,,,,he just needed current facts. News people have facts. Whew.

I think his cabinet is perfect, but you seem to think that their backgrounds, like being in the news business (qulaified big time on current evenrs, like Sonholuse wants people to pay tuitions and to let men with peckers race girls) makes them unqualified. Absolutely unbelieveable. You might take into consideration, that these cab members are people he KNOWS. Like Hegseth. What if he put Marauder, a man he does not know, in a position of power....he is a socialist. AHHHHHH, but Trump's learning from FOX would have turned that up!!!! We luckily skirted Marauder!! Thankyou Trump.

So, all his choices have made his presidency quite successful. 49% rating, all that stuff. People that hate him are blind. With all the history you bitch about, tell us what cab member is doing a bad job.

Would you confer with Rachel Maddow if you were running for president? Who, then?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Rajk999 said
In the days of the Ottomans, there was no land deed, and people simply lived on land inherited.
Nonsense.


@AverageJoe1 said
i would think people who research the news 24/7 would be the first place a person like Trump, with his visionary acumen, would be the people he would talk to, to learn what is happening.
So your being upset about this obvious commendable action of a man to be on top of things,,,,,,,is lost on me. I would do it, too. If you were wanting to know stuff, where would you ...[text shortened]... ing a bad job.

Would you confer with Rachel Maddow if you were running for president? Who, then?
So why is Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard out of the loop now? They are CLEARLY incompetent and should not run a KOOLAID stand much less a hugely important post in the government.
And knowing that why the FK did Trump put them there in the first place?
Getting national security briefs from a known alcoholic and intel from a person who was paid by foreign governments to lobby for them.
Just the kind of people you want to guard our national security.
So why did he hire them, eh? They are LITERALLY out of the inner circle loop RIGHT NOW.
If you don't believe me, just frigging GOOGLE it, don't as me to prove it.

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
i would think people who research the news 24/7 would be the first place a person like Trump, with his visionary acumen, would be the people he would talk to, to learn what is happening.
So your being upset about this obvious commendable action of a man to be on top of things,,,,,,,is lost on me. I would do it, too. If you were wanting to know stuff, where would you ...[text shortened]... ing a bad job.

Would you confer with Rachel Maddow if you were running for president? Who, then?
Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar, not that that means anything to you.
I FOR SURE would NEVER look to Tucker Carlson or any of that biased bunch of crazies at Fox so called News.
They even admit it is NOT a news outlet, just entertainment so they can lie all they want.


@sonhouse said
So why is Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard out of the loop now? They are CLEARLY incompetent and should not run a KOOLAID stand much less a hugely important post in the government.
And knowing that why the FK did Trump put them there in the first place?
Getting national security briefs from a known alcoholic and intel from a person who was paid by foreign governments to lobby for ...[text shortened]... r circle loop RIGHT NOW.
If you don't believe me, just frigging GOOGLE it, don't as me to prove it.
You imply that Trump was returning some sort of favor to Hegseth to make him Secretary. Is that right? Trump could pick anyone, but he owed something to hegseth . So tell us what he owed to him for God sake.

1 edit

@sonhouse said
Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar, not that that means anything to you.
I FOR SURE would NEVER look to Tucker Carlson or any of that biased bunch of crazies at Fox so called News.
They even admit it is NOT a news outlet, just entertainment so they can lie all they want.
Yes, he was in the entertainment business. Whatever that has to do with anything it’s a business. To make a lot of money that’s why you do business. You lost me on that one. That doesn’t not make him a lesser man to decide to go into the entertainment business. I might mention that a man in the entertainment business became president of the United States. So yeah, I do not get what you are saying. Thirdly, I know a R Scholar quite well. I play golf with him often. He is real book smart. He is a total conservative like I am. Rachel Maddow is a total liberal. So I still did not get what in the hell you’re talking about.

1 edit

@sonhouse said
Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar, not that that means anything to you.
I FOR SURE would NEVER look to Tucker Carlson or any of that biased bunch of crazies at Fox so called News.
They even admit it is NOT a news outlet, just entertainment so they can lie all they want.
hahaha. I watch MSNBC for fun sometimes, today one of the hosts said that the 'public' of the USA should have a say about decisions on whether to take action against Iran. ooohhh, sonhouse........ Jesus. Let's ask Maddow's audience for their concerted opinion. Maybe have a bit of military experience, like the National Guard!!!!!
And they showed a video of Steve Bannon 'going in to the WH!!" Gasp!! Y'all are such pansies. Do you have ANY idea how many communists and socialists reguLarly visited Biden??!?!?!

Back on FOX, they show that Trump has a tight inner circle advising him right now. You, a member of the puuuuubbblic, want him to have all of his cabinet including Hegseth in the room. You 2nd guess why he omits some cab members, like Hegseth. He certainly should be upset with Gabbard, maybe fire her, no question. You, like Marauder, expect perfection in these harried times. Frankly, I am not so sure about women having such positions anyway. Can a woman who has a natural desire to create babies go to a meeting about bombing civilians, killing people. That is a man's job,,,,,been that way 1000s of years.
My 2 cents. Just Kamala and Hillary. Creepy stuff.
I recommend everyone view MSNBC on occasion. You talk about angst!!!