@no1marauder saidExactly ... A conquering nation, does not need permission from some stupid international agency, which only just got started, in 1920 to tell it what to do. The British spent the money, time and effort to develop Palestine for 30 years and they considered it part of the British Empire. They F...king owned Palestine... you moron, and could have done whatever they pleased with it. They choose the option of the Partition Plan and left. The stupid Arabs wanted ALL... and their greed caused them to get nothing, which is what they deserve. Shut up now.
Read the Mandate document. The Brits might have run it like a colony, but it was not as that document makes clear (you don't need permission from an international agency to make policy changes in a colony).
@Rajk999 saidDo you think repeatedly lying will somehow transform your lies into the truth?
Exactly ... A conquering nation, does not need permission from some stupid international agency, which only just got started, in 1920 to tell it what to do. The British spent the money, time and effort to develop Palestine for 30 years and they considered it part of the British Empire. They F...king owned Palestine... you moron, and could have done whatever they pleased wi ...[text shortened]... wanted ALL... and their greed caused them to get nothing, which is what they deserve. Shut up now.
The Mandate document, which the British government agreed to, refutes your claims; it limits what that government can do in Palestine and requires annual reports from it to be submitted to the League.
Rant all you want; it's clear Palestine was never a colony of the British Empire and the Mandate itself forbids the British from doing what you claim they did i.e. give it to the Zionists.
@no1marauder saidWhat nonsense is this now about forbidding the British from giving land to the Zionists ... thats hilarious.
Do you think repeatedly lying will somehow transform your lies into the truth?
The Mandate document, which the British government agreed to, refutes your claims; it limits what that government can do in Palestine and requires annual reports from it to be submitted to the League.
Rant all you want; it's clear Palestine was never a colony of the British Empire and th ...[text shortened]... Mandate itself forbids the British from doing what you claim they did i.e. give it to the Zionists.
Answer this one question truthfully. Is it not true that the Mandate Document of the League of Nations of 1922, incorporated the Balfour Declaration, the primary aim of which was setting a home for the Jewish people, in the land of Palestine.
The Mandate contained the Balfour Declaration. YES OR NO.
Its YES. Then the British were required to pass over land to the Jews. The British hoped that the two groups could have lived peacefully side by side, but after 30 years of fighting, the British was happy to accept the Partition Plan of the UN and they left in 1948.
Part of the aim of the Mandate was to set up Israel in Palestine.
@spruce112358 saidYou just said that killing all Israeli Jews by nuclear Holocaust is justified.
Correct. Would you like to give Palestinians their rights now?
That alternative is ... unpleasant. 😆
I urge Israelis to consider rights, justice, and peace for all instead of 'lebensraum.'
Unless you were exaggerating or want to retract it, you don't get to suggest a damned thing to Israeli Jews.
@sh76 saidSpruce is an open Jew-hater. He has stated or implied many times that Jews should be killed, wiped out, destroyed. The only people that say these things are extremist Muslims. Even a regular moderate Muslim would never say such a thing.
You just said that killing all Israeli Jews by nuclear Holocaust is justified.
Unless you were exaggerating or want to retract it, you don't get to suggest a damned thing to Israeli Jews.
@sh76 saidI said that Israeli Jews must cease denying Palestinians their rights. 😆
You just said that killing all Israeli Jews by nuclear Holocaust is justified.
Unless you were exaggerating or want to retract it, you don't get to suggest a damned thing to Israeli Jews.
They can do that in one of several ways. But refusing is NOT an option. NOT as in "they cannot."
When someone persists in doing something they CANNOT do, then yes, their lives are forfeit. If they can be stopped without killing them (or killing anyone else) that is preferable. But that depends largely on when the perpetrators stop doing the thing they cannot do.😆
@Rajk999 saidRidiculous. I like Jews as much as anybody I've ever met.
Spruce is an open Jew-hater. He has stated or implied many times that Jews should be killed, wiped out, destroyed. The only people that say these things are extremist Muslims. Even a regular moderate Muslim would never say such a thing.
I don't like YOU though! 😆
@spruce112358 saidYou want Iran to nuke them, but you like them. You Muslims think the world is full of idiots, and you can do whatever you want.
Ridiculous. I like Jews as much as anybody I've ever met.
I don't like YOU though! 😆
You got the impression Im looking for friends?
@spruce112358 saidIf by 'Devil' you mean a person that cannot stand extremist Islam and terrorists, then Yeah, Im a Devil.
No! 😆
j/k. Let's be friends, @Rajk999. I am an expert at being friends with Devils.
@spruce112358 saidIf they did not do the stuff they did, they would have been exterminated 75 years ago. Thank God, the Jews [like me], dont GAF about the opinion of terrorists and their supporters.
No. Sure, as individuals. 😆
Their nation has gone berserk, though. A nuclear counter-threat would ABSOLUTELY be helpful in bringing them back to reason.😆
@spruce112358 saidYour mental gymnastics:
No. Sure, as individuals. 😆
Their nation has gone berserk, though. A nuclear counter-threat would ABSOLUTELY be helpful in bringing them back to reason.😆
The individual Israelis, likable as individuals, can be justifiably murdered because they bear collective guilt for their nation's denial of Palestinian rights.
The Palestinians, however, some of whom played the rape-n-bake-Israelis game on Oct 7th, do not bear collective guilt for their "nation's" denial of their victims rights.
@Sleepyguy saidI mean... if you want to put it that way, go ahead. I don't. 😆
Your mental gymnastics:
The individual Israelis, likable as individuals, can be justifiably murdered because they bear collective guilt for their nation's denial of Palestinian rights.
The Palestinians, however, some of whom played the rape-n-bake-Israelis game on Oct 7th, do not bear collective guilt for their "nation's" denial of their victims rights.
That would be like saying "the Japanese can be justifiably murdered because they bear collective guilt for their nation's attack on Pearl Harbor" That confounds war with murder - not the same thing.
The Israelis have to be stopped by any means necessary because the world cannot tolerate that level of injustice. THEY choose what 'necessary' ends up looking like. 😆
@Rajk999 saidCant answer truthfully?
What nonsense is this now about forbidding the British from giving land to the Zionists ... thats hilarious.
Answer this one question truthfully. Is it not true that the Mandate Document of the League of Nations of 1922, incorporated the Balfour Declaration, the primary aim of which was setting a home for the Jewish people, in the land of Palestine.
The Mandate ...[text shortened]... the UN and they left in 1948.
Part of the aim of the Mandate was to set up Israel in Palestine.