@athousandyoung saidYou're saying Biggs murdered a guard? You're insane.https://www.democracynow.org/2015/6/12/from_solitary_to_the_street_coping
Former Black Panther Albert Woodfox has been in solitary for over 40 years.
@wajoma saidI grew up seeing those stupid "Free Mumia He is a Political Prisoner" posters all over the place. You remind me of the people who put up those posters.
It was an out of control mob, who were not receiving secret code words to activate and steer them.
Biggs, Tarrio (who didn't attend) and others are political prisoners, Biggs has been tortured (baseless isolation) and no doubt been offered all kinds of deals to roll on all kinds of people. A man of extreme integrity and resolve, traits which helped him win two purple heart ...[text shortened]... greatest test of his life and so far stood strong. One day he'll be recognised for the hero he is.
@wajoma saidAnd Biggs would be better served reflecting on his moral failings and character flaws which led him to such a fate rather than whimpering about such trivial matters while still seeking to justify his crimes.
Not sure what your point is, no doubt prison food is shyte, I've seen this a few times now, Biggs has dared to comment on the food and you'd like to turn that into some kind of victory? Next we'll be hearing prison rapes jokes from you.
This is the pathetic level you and your sources have stooped to, and says a great deal about your character.
"Weeee, they serve bad f ...[text shortened]... at Biggs, weeee go on eat some of that food Biggs weeee, take it, weee"
You've bottomed out.
Maybe if he showed sufficient contrition and if the 2024 election is not marred by the same type of violence meant to overturn an election, the winning Democratic candidate might be magnanimous enough to commute his sentence.
@wajoma saidOdd that the mob only got "out of control" AFTER Trump had finished his speech about a mile or so away.
It was an out of control mob, who were not receiving secret code words to activate and steer them.
Biggs, Tarrio (who didn't attend) and others are political prisoners, Biggs has been tortured (baseless isolation) and no doubt been offered all kinds of deals to roll on all kinds of people. A man of extreme integrity and resolve, traits which helped him win two purple heart ...[text shortened]... greatest test of his life and so far stood strong. One day he'll be recognised for the hero he is.
4 edits
@wajoma saidNo; I'm saying the prison staff said Woodfox murdered a guard.
You're saying Biggs murdered a guard? You're insane.
These prison guards are a "vindictive malicious" group who will lie to put people in isolation according to someone on the forum. Clearly we cannot take them at their word about such things.
They did the same thing to Robert King. He spent 29 years in solitary before his conviction was overturned.
@no1marauder saidYes, Trump uttered some majic code words, they could be 'Stop the steal' they could have been some arrangement of words contained in a tweet, and yet again they may have been part of a speech delivered earlier, No1. has tried all three of these. And on this basis an unruly mob were to track down certain people and get them to write certain specific legal statements, if there were any resistance from these certain people electrodes were to be attached to their balls or Pelosis flaps and 5000 volts was to be administered until they signed them.
Odd that the mob only got "out of control" AFTER Trump had finished his speech about a mile or so away.
A number of times No1 has been asked to play out the scenario, what he imagined the plan would be, the details of it, what would occur if the demands of the mob were not met, as if there were some consensus in the mob.
All we've seen is two words 'a plan' no details of the plan, no details of who was planning the plan.
@athousandyoung saidDo you know how hard it is to formulate and drive a revolution when you're not in prison. That you ride with this ridiculous unrealistic scenario should be a prompt for you to re assess what you believe and why you believe it.
Those who lead criminal activities are usually isolated to prevent communications. Nothing new or malicious here.
I understand you like Biggs but he's just being treated like any other criminal.
That you would try to equivocate Bigg's trespass with some one that murdered a prison guard should be sending red flags to your brain, you're in the world of fanaticism.
@wajoma saidSo when your guy is put in solitary the prison guards are malicious liars but when Woodfox was put in solitary you believe the same guards completely unquestioningly.
Do you know how hard it is to formulate and drive a revolution when you're not in prison. That you ride with this ridiculous unrealistic scenario should be a prompt for you to re assess what you believe and why you believe it.
That you would try to equivocate Bigg's trespass with some one that murdered a prison guard should be sending red flags to your brain, you're in the world of fanaticism.
Are they malicious liars or not?
@kevcvs57 saidkev bamboozle, your buddies are saying it's definitely not political.
The sentencing is political because the crime was political
They attempted to overturn the will of the people in order to instal a right wing totalitarian goobermint, you really are the most faux liberal and biggest hypocrite on this site.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/05/us/albert-woodfox-dead.html#:~:text=Woodfox%20was%20placed%20in%20solitary,indictments%20stretching%20over%20four%20decades.
Mr. Woodfox was placed in solitary confinement in 1972 after being accused of murdering Brent Miller, a 23-year-old corrections officer. A tangled legal ordeal ensued, including two convictions, both overturned, and three indictments stretching over four decades.
The case struck most commentators as problematic. No forensic evidence linked Mr. Woodfox to the crime, so the authorities’ argument depended on witnesses, who over time were discredited or proved unreliable.
@athousandyoung saidI have no idea and therefore cannot comment, this is not standard message board protocol where people pretend they're experts on anything and everything. I comment on subjects that interest me. I already waste too much time here, care quota is full. If you don't care about the unjust treatment of Biggs, Tarrio and others no worries, if you must comment realise I don't care about your whataboutisms which tend to relentless expansion and continuous goal post moving.
So when your guy is put in solitary the prison guards are malicious liars but when Woodfox was put in solitary you believe the same guards completely unquestioningly.
Are they malicious liars or not?
@wajoma said#all prisoners matter
I have no idea and therefore cannot comment, this is not standard message board protocol where people pretend they're experts on anything and everything. I comment on subjects that interest me. I already waste too much time here, care quota is full. If you don't care about the unjust treatment of Biggs, Tarrio and others no worries, if you must comment realise I don't care about your whataboutisms which tend to relentless expansion and continuous goal post moving.
2 edits
@wajoma saidBut you do comment.
I have no idea and therefore cannot comment, this is not standard message board protocol where people pretend they're experts on anything and everything. I comment on subjects that interest me. I already waste too much time here, care quota is full. If you don't care about the unjust treatment of Biggs, Tarrio and others no worries, if you must comment realise I don't care about your whataboutisms which tend to relentless expansion and continuous goal post moving.
You say they are malicious liars for Briggs, but you accept their allegations when it comes to Woodfox even though he was not found guilty of the murder they and you accuse him of.
@athousandyoung saidI hear you, it's not possible to speak of the specifics of one or two prisoners without discussing the specifics of the millions of other prisoners individually all over the world, which is an impossible task.
But you do comment.
You say they are malicious liars for Briggs, but you accept their allegations when it comes to Woodfox even though he was not found guilty of those murders.
The only assumption is you want people to play your game in order to tank the the subject, don't be surprised when you find yourself playing with yourself.
@athousandyoung saidijit, I just said I don't know the details of your hobby horse prisoners.
But you do comment.
You say they are malicious liars for Briggs, but you accept their allegations when it comes to Woodfox even though he was not found guilty of the murder they and you accuse him of.