@no1marauder saidI'd need to see the route which they must surely have from all the vid. You've already had to back down on the exaggerated misleading 'directly' and the place may well have 500 rooms, how many of them are the size of the senate chamber i.e. you could hardly miss it.
Did he and the group he was leading go to the Senate chamber?
Yes or no.
233d
@wajoma saidSo now your story is that Biggs wound up in the Senate Chamber on January 6th, 2021 by utter coincidence? You know the exact place the "Steal" was occurring in the very city on the exact day the Proud Boys had assembled for the "Stop the Steal" rally? Inside the Capitol which Tarrio had said they planned to "storm"?
I'd need to see the route which they must surely have from all the vid. You've already had to back down on the exaggerated misleading 'directly' and the place may well have 500 rooms, how many of them are the size of the senate chamber i.e. you could hardly miss it.
Wow "irony can be pretty ironic", huh?
@no1marauder saidWere there any other protestors in the senate chamber that had not been 'directed' (no evidence given) there by Tario and 'lead' (no evidence given) there by Biggs?
So now your story is that Biggs wound up in the Senate Chamber on January 6th, 2021 by utter coincidence? You know the exact place the "Steal" was occurring in the very city on the exact day the Proud Boys had assembled for the "Stop the Steal" rally? Inside the Capitol which Tarrio had said they planned to "storm"?
Wow "irony can be pretty ironic", huh?
@wajoma said"No evidence"? LMAO!
Were there any other protestors in the senate chamber that had not been 'directed' (no evidence given) there by Tario and 'lead' (no evidence given) there by Biggs?
Just, for starters, Biggs shouting orders with a bullhorn, saying to others he had discussed a plan with Tarrio and Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, talking about a plan to "storm the Capitol".
Are you trying to look foolish?
If you were honest, which you obviously are not, you'd admit that there would be no level of evidence that you would ever accept to make you concede that these defendants were guilty of the charges. You'd further admit that this is based on purely ideological grounds.
233d
@no1marauder saidRay Epps did the same thing. Why wasn't he charged with seditious conspiracy?
"No evidence"? LMAO!
Just, for starters, Biggs shouting orders with a bullhorn, saying to others he had discussed a plan with Tarrio and Tarrio, the leader of the Proud Boys, talking about a plan to "storm the Capitol".
Are you trying to look foolish?
If you were honest, which you obviously are not, you'd admit that there would be no level of evidence that you wo ...[text shortened]... ts were guilty of the charges. You'd further admit that this is based on purely ideological grounds.
@metal-brain saidNo he didn't.
Ray Epps did the same thing. Why wasn't he charged with seditious conspiracy?
I asked you this before and you had no answer:
Who did Epps "conspire" with? Not make one off-hand comment the night before; name the group and/or the individuals Epps conspired with.
233d
@no1marauder saidYou must be thinking of someone else. If you had asked me I would have answered......like this:
No he didn't.
I asked you this before and you had no answer:
Who did Epps "conspire" with? Not make one off-hand comment the night before; name the group and/or the individuals Epps conspired with.
He conspired with everyone he told to go into the capitol building. He told that to a big crowd of people. He texted that he "orchestrated it", which is an admission he conspired with them. He said he would go to jail for saying what he said which is an admission that he was breaking the law by doing so.
That is an open and shut case of seditious conspiracy. Admit it.
233d
@metal-brain saidMaking one off-hand comment to a group of people you don't know isn't a "conspiracy". Didn't most of them ignore him and/or call him a "fed"?
You must be thinking of someone else. If you had asked me I would have answered......like this:
He conspired with everyone he told to go into the capitol building. He told that to a big crowd of people. He texted that he "orchestrated it", which is an admission he conspired with them. He said he would go to jail for saying what he said which is an admission that he was breaking the law by doing so.
That is an open and shut case of seditious conspiracy. Admit it.
Another of your almost endless "false whataboutisms".
233d
@no1marauder
You must believe Ray Epps is an FBI or CIA agent.
Why else would you be defending him?
233d
@metal-brain saidI'm not "defending" him; just pointing out how ridiculous your false whataboutisms are that use him.
@no1marauder
You must believe Ray Epps is an FBI or CIA agent.
Why else would you be defending him?
233d
@no1marauder saidYes you are.
I'm not "defending" him; just pointing out how ridiculous your false whataboutisms are that use him.
You believe he is a an FBI or CIA agent. That is why you are defending him. If you sincerely believed he was a staunch Trump supporter you would want him to rot in prison.
@metal-brain saidThe way right wingers stomp their feet when they are shown to be making fools of themselves is almost amusing (in a pathetic way).
Yes you are.
You believe he is a an FBI or CIA agent. That is why you are defending him. If you sincerely believed he was a staunch Trump supporter you would want him to rot in prison.
233d
@no1marauder saidThat is your psychological projection.
The way right wingers stomp their feet when they are shown to be making fools of themselves is almost amusing (in a pathetic way).
I don't recall you ever denying Epps was an FBI or CIA agent. You approve of him setting up Trump to make it look like he wanted people to storm the CB to give the appearance of an insurrection. That is why you don't want Epps charged with his other crimes.
You know he is guilty of trespassing on Capital grounds too. That is irrefutable. Do you want him charged with that? Yes or no?