@kazetnagorrasaid Or they might have lost an unfair election, legitimizing Maduro's victory.
The claim that the election was "unfair" is pretty unconvincing. What evidence supports such an assertion?
BY refusing to contest the election, they left no legal avenues to remove Maduro. IF they want violence and civil war, it was a good move; if they want Maduro out short of such measures, it was a poor one.
Considering that turnout in 2018 was a mere 46.1% (and a 1/3 of those voted against Maduro) while 2013 turnout was 80%, it seems highly likely that Maduro would have been defeated if the opposition hadn't boycotted esp. if they had united behind one candidate. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/21/venezuela-elections-nicolas-maduro-wins-second-term
@no1maraudersaid The claim that the election was "unfair" is pretty unconvincing. What evidence supports such an assertion?
BY refusing to contest the election, they left no legal avenues to remove Maduro. IF they want violence and civil war, it was a good move; if they want Maduro out short of such measures, it was a poor one.
There were certainly problems with the 2018 election; some major opposition figures were barred from running for various reasons. [...] The claim that the election was "unfair" is pretty unconvincing.
There were certainly problems with the 2018 election; some major opposition figures were barred from running for various reasons. [...] The claim that the election was "unfair" is pretty unconvincing.
?
Those comments are not contradictory; there can be "problems" with an election yet the resulting election might not be "unfair". It is a "problem" that Donald Trump could win an election for US President while getting 3 million less votes but that doesn't mean the election was "unfair" in the sense of being illegitimate.
I don't think Capriles and the others should have been banned from running, but as far as the actual election I don't see convincing evidence that it was run in a way that would have made Maduro's victory a foregone conclusion.
@js357said Well, you did end that paragraph like an extremist would, saying a specific individual should have been executed.
Kissinger advised Nixon to overthrow a democratically elected leader and replace him with Pinochet, a brutal dictator. People were killed in that coup, then there were subsequent killings to brutally oppress.
That doesn't deserve execution? How is my wanting Kissinger to face justice extreme?