@earl-of-trumps saidAuto mod but I’ve copied it to clipboard and I’m going to keep at them until they explain because there not even a series of otherwise innocuous letters in a row.
^^ Kev... how can we hear you when you keep going away?? 😆
But still prefer mods to no mods but what i don’t understand is how an algorithm cannot spot a space between words.
Really really good post as well, probably the post of the year if such an award exists.
Thanks for your concern though earl.
@kevcvs57 saidfunny how liberals are all for censorship...until it happens to them.
Auto mod but I’ve copied it to clipboard and I’m going to keep at them until they explain because there not even a series of otherwise innocuous letters in a row.
But still prefer mods to no mods but what i don’t understand is how an algorithm cannot spot a space between words.
Really really good post as well, probably the post of the year if such an award exists.
Thanks for your concern though earl.
Ive been trying to tell you about these others things you are supporting. When the people you support gains enough power, you are not going to like the outcome.
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidIt’s not my fault you cannot or will not read, every time it happens to me (and it’s always an auto mod mistake) I reaffirm my support for censorship on these forums.
funny how liberals are all for censorship...until it happens to them.
Ive been trying to tell you about these others things you are supporting. When the people you support gains enough power, you are not going to like the outcome.
Unlike the right wingers on the site who scream left wing conspiracy every time one of their racist or phobic pieces of crap get taken down.
@earl-of-trumps saidActually agree with you, for all his idiocy (which is plentiful) i don't think he would be that insensitive towards ex military.
The article is a pile of doodoo
Who witnessed Trump say what you just posted? Give me a name.
@kevcvs57 said"(and it’s always an auto mod mistake)"
It’s not my fault you cannot or will not read, every time it happens to me (and it’s always an auto mod mistake) I reaffirm my support for censorship on these forums.
Unlike the right wingers on the site who scream left wing conspiracy every time one of their racist or phobic pieces of crap get taken down.
LOL
1 edit
@trev33 saidYou don't think he would say anyone who served in Vietnam was a "sucker"?
Actually agree with you, for all his idiocy (which is plentiful) i don't think he would be that insensitive towards ex military.
On the contrary, it sounds exactly like something the Donald would say. And the cover story that he didn't go to the cemetery in France because of weather seems like BS; Fox News confirmed the rain was a "drizzle". https://www.newsweek.com/fox-reporter-hits-back-after-trump-calls-her-firing-over-atlantic-story-1529907
@no1marauder saidYou're going to hear all kinds of crap about both sides coming up to the election, what you choose to believe will probably be decided by how you're going to vote.
You don't think he would say anyone who served in Vietnam was a "sucker"?
On the contrary, it sounds exactly like something the Donald would say. And the cover story that he didn't go to the cemetery in France because of weather seems like BS; Fox News confirmed the rain was a "drizzle". https://www.newsweek.com/fox-reporter-hits-back-after-trump-calls-her-firing-over-atlantic-story-1529907
@trev33 saidA lame cop out. That's there is an election upcoming doesn't relieve one of the responsibility of evaluating the veracity of claims using the best information available.
You're going to hear all kinds of crap about both sides coming up to the election, what you choose to believe will probably be decided by how you're going to vote.
@no1marauder saidSo how is the evaluation coming along, do you have all the best information assembled? Short of a recording, I just don't see how 'the people who will assimilate everything' are going to arrive at a conclusion about what was said and when, so what will have been the point of all the hundred posts above? I would have been glad to enter the fray, but saw not one fact to sink my teeth into. Saved me enough time to get in a fine round of golf !
A lame cop out. That's there is an election upcoming doesn't relieve one of the responsibility of evaluating the veracity of claims using the best information available.
@AverageJoe1
So it doesn't matter what Trump has ALREADY said about military folks like John McCain, do we have to post the video on that or the gold star family Trump denigrated?
There is a pattern here and what was reported is entirely believable. Your god king is not who you think he is.
@averagejoe1 saidTo those of us who have had the misfortune to be exposed to Trump's idiocy for more than 30 years, the comments seem completely in character. He avoided service in Vietnam, seems quite proud of doing so and thus him saying that those who did serve were "suckers" is 100% believable. That even Fox News reporters are confirming that their sources have stated they have heard such drivel from the Donald is more persuasive evidence that he said such things.
So how is the evaluation coming along, do you have all the best information assembled? Short of a recording, I just don't see how 'the people who will assimilate everything' are going to arrive at a conclusion about what was said and when, so what will have been the point of all the hundred posts above? I would have been glad to enter the fray, but saw not one fact to sink my teeth into. Saved me enough time to get in a fine round of golf !
So I think most people who are not absolutely Trump fanatics (many of those seem to have little knowledge of his pre-Presidency antics) are going to evaluate that the Atlantic article is accurate and Trump is lying about it.