@vivify saidTrue content will help republicans. An example, many folks here like Vivify do not know many real news reports, the lap top from hell, such as that. So when they start to see what is really going on, they will realize how horrible liberalism and non-patriotism is. And illegals, everything. What republicans stand for. Liberty at last!!
Yawn.
The party that supports Miss Jewish-Space-Lasers and President Cancer-Windmills is clearly not concerned with "true" content.
@sonhouse saidNo , Sonhouse, you are wrong. If it is for freedom and liberty, my gerbil can be the sole gatekeeper. But one person would be better, bring it!!!!!!
@Metal-Brain
You love the idea of authoritarians and Musk is now authoritarian over Twitter.
That means ONE PERSON controls what is said and stopped on T.
I assume you find nothing wrong with that.
If Musk lets Trump back in, I don't think you will like that but I would not be surprised if that happens.
Musk said Trump should not be POTUS around 2015 or so but we don't ...[text shortened]... how he thinks about him now.
One person should not be the gatekeeper for freedom issues. Period.
Happy days are here again. So tell us, what are you going to do on Freedom Day? Should we make it another National Holiday? Why Not?
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidDude, *you* don't even know. How many times have I asked you what exactly is in the laptop that implicates Joe Biden of any wrongdoing and you have failed to mention anything? You just keep making empty claims that there's something in it but fail (repeatedly) at being able to name what it is.
many folks here like Vivify do not know many real news reports, the lap top from hell, such as that.
Here's proof. One of two things will happen: either you will pretend you didn't see this post and dodge it, or you'll respond and STILL won't say what exactly is in this "laptop from hell" that implicates Biden. This will be your like your tenth thread in a row where you fail to actually state what specifically about this laptop matters.
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidWhat are you babbling about, Twitter will still have to abide by regulations concerning what can and cannot be aired on its platform, homophobic racists like you and mott won’t be anymore welcome.
No , Sonhouse, you are wrong. If it is for freedom and liberty, my gerbil can be the sole gatekeeper. But one person would be better, bring it!!!!!!
Happy days are here again. So tell us, what are you going to do on Freedom Day? Should we make it another National Holiday? Why Not?
You need to stay on Parler and diazepam.
@metal-brain saidVery very good post. We have a social duty to bring these libs along. (I hate typing that word 'social'. Hopefully one of their algorithms won't pick up on it!!!)
Any former POTUS should have access to Twitter if they want it. Trump says he isn't going to though. He is trying to build up Truth Social.
You should be tolerant of people you hate instead of resorting to censorship. Spread the information about him I have provided you. That will bring him down so he is not POTUS again. Your calling for censoring him is just causing r ...[text shortened]... w. Fight him with facts, not censorship. He is a paper tiger. Get on social media and expose his BS.
@vivify saidActually, everyone here knows that I did. Wasn't difficult. I finally left you with 'look it up, it is all over 'conservative' sites',, since you only follow lib ones. I also,,,oh, never mind. My dad used to say 'never complain, never explain'.
Dude, *you* don't even know. How many times have I asked you what exactly is in the laptop that implicates Joe Biden of any wrongdoing and you have failed to mention anything? You just keep making empty claims that there's something in it but fail (repeatedly) at being able to name what it is.
Here's proof. One of two things will happen: either you will pretend you didn' ...[text shortened]... hread in a row where you fail to actually state what specifically about this laptop matters.
May I direct you now to the US attorney in Delaware, who is 24/7 running an ongoing investigation on the Biden family. Soon this will all be so humongous that the lap-top-from-hell will be a side issue. And remember, I have always told you turkeys that it is not about Hunter, is about Joe.
It is humorous that you have said that all this money has not proved anything. Was that you? No matter, you or a lib clone. All the same.
@kevcvs57 saidYou are correct, you are always on it!!,,,But, why disparage Mott and myself? Why get personal? Can libs not stay on an issue? I have never slandered Suzy's tattoos or Hoodie, and one of you who actually does up his hair-bun every morning to greet the day. And I suspect a piercing in your midst. You know how we republicans are, so I think I have been very nice.
What are you babbling about, Twitter will still have to abide by regulations concerning what can and cannot be aired on its platform, homophobic racists like you and mott won’t be anymore welcome.
You need to stay on Parler and diazepam.
@AverageJoe1
Kev57, you said above that :"the majority of people do not want to listen to RightWing BS.". Can you follow up on that issue..., links, pictures, who says it,, etc? I did ask you politely. This is an example of libs getting angry. Not answering a genuine request is an example of that.
Hurry, I have a golf game.
2 edits
@averagejoe1 saidBut that is the issue Joe, no site has sanctioned or banned reasonable political discourse.
You are correct, you are always on it!!,,,But, why disparage Mott and myself? Why get personal? Can libs not stay on an issue? I have never slandered Suzy's tattoos or Hoodie, and one of you who actually does up his hair-bun every morning to greet the day. And I suspect a piercing in your midst. You know how we republicans are, so I think I have been very nice.
It’s the culture war being waged by the far right whereby black people are stereotyped and stigmatised, the LGBTQ community are accused of corrupting and grooming children plus countless other ridiculous misinformation tropes that are being censored. That will not change under Musk, well not unless he wants his business banned from Europe anyway.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
@averagejoe1 saidOh dear. Six. He's really going, now.
But one person would be better, bring it!!!!!!
1 edit
@kevcvs57 saidMy error. I thought you were using that post to slander Mott and Me. At least,, that is what I got out of it.
But that is the issue Joe, no site has sanctioned or banned reasonable political discourse.
It’s the culture war being waged by the far right whereby black people are stereotyped and stigmatised, the LGBTQ community are accused of corrupting and grooming children plus countless other ridiculous misinformation tropes that are being censored. That will not change under Musk, well not unless he wants his business banned from Europe anyway.
Thanks for mentioning culture, I have been chided in the past saying that culture is the problem, not race. An example is the nature of the people who keep robbing Louie Vitton. They are stereotyping themselves, for god sakes, Kevin. Geez.
I would be a bit worried if I were you about the teachers, prob 90% of whom are liberal, who are telling our kids stuff that they should not be telling them. Can't wait to see you have to deal with the kids when they come home! I hope to hell that Musk himself writes about these horrible liberal movements.
Anyway, did you answer my question above, 'no none wants to hear right wing BS'?
@averagejoe1 said"This will be your like your tenth thread in a row where you fail to actually state what specifically about this laptop matters."---Vivify
Actually, everyone here knows that I did. Wasn't difficult. I finally left you with 'look it up, it is all over 'conservative' sites',, since you only follow lib ones. I also,,,oh, never mind. My dad used to say 'never complain, never explain'.
May I direct you now to the US attorney in Delaware, who is 24/7 running an ongoing investigation on the Biden family. ...[text shortened]... ll this money has not proved anything. Was that you? No matter, you or a lib clone. All the same.
The streak continues. You've proved my point.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1
Because you and moot are betting on the loss of our democracy and you think you will THRIVE in such an authoritarian regime.
That makes you and Moot and MB the enemy of the people and ONLY for authoritarians who will reek havoc on the US where a very small group will control literally TRILLIONS of dollars in our economy and they WILL syphon off a bunch of it so there will be given billions to those who kiss the ring.
I see your so called brain working that one over, like 'Dems already have a small group of folks controlling the economy' and the like.
So you don't even have to type it out, I did it for you.
A small group of folks who can be voted out of office and a new bunch come in.
An authoritarian will first get total power, and second, trying to get even more power because that is the ONLY thing on an authoritarian's mind which you will find out if your wish comes true.
@sonhouse saidSo.......there will be, after the dust settles, after the election, the SAME number of positions, if you will, filled by the same number of persons as fill them now.
@AverageJoe1
Because you and moot are betting on the loss of our democracy and you think you will THRIVE in such an authoritarian regime.
That makes you and Moot and MB the enemy of the people and ONLY for authoritarians who will reek havoc on the US where a very small group will control literally TRILLIONS of dollars in our economy and they WILL syphon off a bunch of it s ...[text shortened]... e that is the ONLY thing on an authoritarian's mind which you will find out if your wish comes true.
You use the word 'regime'. And you say a 'small group' will control..dollars. 'They', whoever they may be, will siphon it.
So with all that scenario, your premise all laid out, I think you are saying that OUR people could become authoritarians. Bad ones!! But, Are you Implying that YOUR people will not become the authoritarians? Are you saying if you win the seats, there will be NO authoritarians??
Common, plain English. A beginning, a middle and an end. Please,
An authoritarian to me is a leader that does not follow the constitution. Start with your def of an authoritarian. And settle, Sonhouse, settle. Why,you may be on to something .
🤔