@shavixmir saidShatmixir, do you think your right to life only comes from the goobermint too? It's not that goobermint creates rights, it's that goobermint is supposed to recognise and protect rights.
Governments create property rights. So, technically property rights are inherently bamboozled goobermintorial overreach.
Big difference pseud boy.
@wajoma saidNot gonna ask how you got to see stuff like that.
Damn you're dumb, the person says they're asking for a friend when they're actually asking for themselves because they're too embarrassed to ask for themselves. If I were too embarrassed to ask I'd do one of the cliche' 'asking for a friend' lines like kev bamboozle did.
Nope, don't need any help, I've seen stuff that'd make your hair curl. Some of those gaymen like to ...[text shortened]... y for brains he's been pushing the limits with his life size donkey dick dildo collection for years.
You're such a hypocrite, dude.
1 edit
@suzianne saidDefine the hypocrisy. Here's how you do it:
Not gonna ask how you got to see stuff like that.
You're such a hypocrite, dude.
1/ You said 'xxxxxxx' (a quote)
2/ You then said this 'yyyyyyy' (a quote)
3/ x contradicts y, you're a hypocrite.
Do you know what hypocrisy is?
Also how do you know I'm a dude, dude. Do you think that's an insult? Seems you're the hypocrite.
@averagejoe1 saidOh my goodness, can y'all believe we overlooked answering this question? Of Course, Thousand said he has a right to the vegetables. That called for a bit deeper look at the situation.....how could he get the vegetables without breaking the law of trespassing on my land?
If we live on an island, and you look over at my place and see that I have a tremendous garden, more than anybody on the island, do you think you would have any say so or right to any of the produce coming out of my garden.? if you think you do, and go complain to our little island government, do you think the government should have any right to the produce in my garden? I guess we can call this a trick question. Be very careful…….
1 edit
@averagejoe1 said🤦♀️ Facepalm
you even relate back to something a guy named leviticus said, who was simply a latter day Marx.
You suggest that we are to abide by the teachings of these people.!!
@wajoma saidNo. You are just a hypocrite.
Shatmixir, do you think your right to life only comes from the goobermint too? It's not that goobermint creates rights, it's that goobermint is supposed to recognise and protect rights.
Big difference pseud boy.
@wajoma saidExcept that applies to Natural Rights i.e. those that flow from our human nature. But there is nothing in our nature that implies a "right" to own property we cannot personally possess or use; the concept of private property is a creation of the powerful which did not exist in the Natural State.
Shatmixir, do you think your right to life only comes from the goobermint too? It's not that goobermint creates rights, it's that goobermint is supposed to recognise and protect rights.
Big difference pseud boy.
It was created by government force and can only be maintained by force.
@shavixmir saidThere are natural property rights that have to do with possessions like your home, the clothes on your back etc
Governments create property rights. So, technically property rights are inherently bamboozled goobermintorial overreach.
@averagejoe1 saidTaxes
Oh my goodness, can y'all believe we overlooked answering this question? Of Course, Thousand said he has a right to the vegetables. That called for a bit deeper look at the situation.....how could he get the vegetables without breaking the law of trespassing on my land?
@no1marauder saidMarauder, taking your post to its logical conclusion, you are literally suggesting that humanity live in one natural state society, and move amongst each other with only natural feelings and laws, and I might say that in a natural state, there can technically be no law. Because law is not natural. You are one confusing guy.
Except that applies to Natural Rights i.e. those that flow from our human nature. But there is nothing in our nature that implies a "right" to own property we cannot personally possess or use; the concept of private property is a creation of the powerful which did not exist in the Natural State.
It was created by government force and can only be maintained by force.
@athousandyoung saidGive it up, thousand. Just one more skirmish that I have won from you you. Note that no one else wants to fall into the trap. You did.
Taxes
Why don’t you move along and explain natural law to us all? After all, in such a society, you would be able to take all of my blueberries, and marauders chickens.
@averagejoe1 saidGoogle "Natural Law"; I haven't the time or inclination to provide you with an education.
Marauder, taking your post to its logical conclusion, you are literally suggesting that humanity live in one natural state society, and move amongst each other with only natural feelings and laws, and I might say that in a natural state, there can technically be no law. Because law is not natural. You are one confusing guy.
@no1marauder saidHe shouldn’t have to. For most people it’s self evident.
Google "Natural Law"; I haven't the time or inclination to provide you with an education.