1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidYes, smaller than average joe boy, we already know that you trumptarded Musk-rat freaks hate the 1st Amendment of our Constitution and free speech. However, we don't care; and, we challenge you to come and take it. May God Bless ALL Tesla dealership and manufacturer destroyers: you are considered true American patriots by the majority of Americans these days; and, the majority of people in the world today. God Bless you ALL! 😍
https://gazette.com/news/wex/f-bombs-away-democrats-unleash-profanity-and-vulgarity-in-war-with-trump/article_35aa2be2-46cb-530b-b73f-667d7f48bda7.html
You guys just keep on giving. Repubs do not do profanity on a regular, programed, basis,,,,,,,it is obvious that this is a huge overnight talking point that your 'leaders' (whoever they are) have dicated to everyone in ...[text shortened]... source, it will be there.
Thinking it sounds like alpha males, etc, it actually is quite weak.
Put that in your 1st amendment audit little joe boy.
@AverageJoe1 saidThere is nothing in America as offensive as you troglodytes tearing up the Constitution.
Because it is, No1Marauder. A lot of things which are offensive, you believe in. Profanity is offensive. Thus, you are offensive. A bit lonely, I'd figure as well. 🙁
@Suzianne said.?? Many of you have posted we should change the constitution. Funny I have never heard one of our representatives or constitutional experts ever suggest that we change the constitution. But that is for another thread.
There is nothing in America as offensive as you troglodytes tearing up the Constitution.
So let me get this straight. You want to change the constitution, but you are saying that we are the ones that want to tear up the constitution? Would you and moonbus not have to tear up the constitution to change it? You see the dilemma that you put us in with every post that we do our best with. You leave us so distraught.
@Suzianne saidGood, endorse it only because of loyalty to him. Let me get this straight… I have been chided by you libs for being loyal to Donald Trump endorsing what he is doing. I am not sure about what he is thinking, but I believe in him. You on the other hand endorse what Zahlanzi said without knowing what he said.
Standard member
Zahlanzi [View Profile]
Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
This post is unavailable
Please refer to our posting guidelines
I don't even know what this post said, but since some butt-hurt entitled Trumpublican alerted it, I must say that I fully endorse its message.
Oh sue, what is gnawing your sensibilities so.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop posting fake premises.
.?? Many of you have posted we should change the constitution. Funny I have never heard one of our representatives or constitutional experts ever suggest that we change the constitution. But that is for another thread.
So let me get this straight. You want to change the constitution, but you are saying that we are the ones that want to tear up the constitution? Would yo ...[text shortened]... the dilemma that you put us in with every post that we do our best with. You leave us so distraught.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidThe worst thing Trump ever said (oh, how to choose from SO many!), is about 6 magnitudes worse than the worst thing Zahlanzi ever said.
Good, endorse it only because of loyalty to him. Let me get this straight… I have been chided by you libs for being loyal to Donald Trump endorsing what he is doing. I am not sure about what he is thinking, but I believe in him. You on the other hand endorse what Zahlanzi said without knowing what he said.
Oh sue, what is gnawing your sensibilities so.
Reading is not your strong point.
@Suzianne said''Let me get this straight… I have been chided by you libs for being loyal to Donald Trump endorsing what he is doing. I am not sure about what he is thinking, but I believe in him. You on the other hand endorse what Zahlanzi said without knowing what he said.'
The worst thing Trump ever said (oh, how to choose from SO many!), is about 6 magnitudes worse than the worst thing Zahlanzi ever said.
Reading is not your strong point.
I said this. Pretty straightforward. You do not answer my asking you how you believe in Zahlanzi, when not even knowing what he said, but do not want me to believe in Trump.
So, how do you square this? Is this why you and Kewpie don't like me?
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidYou do realize the Constitution in Article V provides for amendments and has, in fact, been amended 27 times? https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
There is nothing false about this premise.
.
How do you promote changing the constitution, which amounts to tearing it up, when you just said that we the republicans want to tear it up. Geez. Y'all are coming off your rockers.
That's the preferable course of action rather than ignoring its provisions as the Trump administration has repeatedly done.
@no1marauder saidOf course, but maybe you can explain what this course of action is by the Democrats who seem to want to tear everything up , not just the constitution?
You do realize the Constitution in Article V provides for amendments and has, in fact, been amended 27 times? https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/
That's the preferable course of action rather than ignoring its provisions as the Trump administration has repeatedly done.
You are aware that liberals want to change things, but do not want us to change anything. We have a president now who can change things with the stroke of a pin. Liberals do not have that and they are really upset about it. They want to amend the constitution to make big government. We want to stop big government, and we want to save America. I see a lot of difference there.
How about you acknowledge that liberals want larger government, and conservatives want smaller government. Can you acknowledge that or do you have to write a tome like Sunhouse does.
@AverageJoe1 saidStop "big government"? Are you joking?
Of course, but maybe you can explain what this course of action is by the Democrats who seem to want to tear everything up , not just the constitution?
You are aware that liberals want to change things, but do not want us to change anything. We have a president now who can change things with the stroke of a pin. Liberals do not have that and they are really upset abo ...[text shortened]... ant smaller government. Can you acknowledge that or do you have to write a tome like Sunhouse does.
You think claiming the President can just send people to a foreign prison without a hearing is "stopping big government"? You think the President interfering with scholastic and college sporting events is "stopping big government"? You think the President claiming to have authority over every State's election laws is "stopping big government"?
And on and on and on.
MAGA isn't about "stopping big government". It's about vastly expanding governmental powers to attack certain groups and individuals that Trump and his enablers don't like and/or find politically expedient to do so.
@AverageJoe1 saidThere is no mertit whatsoever in that type of "conversation".
That was a private conversation, and it was locker room joking. You Beta Males have no feel for locker room jargon.
And it is mainly bragging and putting oneself up about more or less everything and everbody else. In children we would abhor that behaviour (I hope).
@no1marauder saidIf someone cannot prove to be legally here, we can do any thing that we want to do to them. Prison for life, or send them back. Right now, its bye bye. I truly think you libs think the onus is on our government to prove they should NOT be here. No, you are wrong. They need to prove they have rights, or leave. Geez.
Stop "big government"? Are you joking?
You think claiming the President can just send people to a foreign prison without a hearing is "stopping big government"? You think the President interfering with scholastic and college sporting events is "stopping big government"? You think the President claiming to have authority over every State's election laws is "stopping bi ...[text shortened]... s and individuals that Trump and his enablers don't like and/or find politically expedient to do so.
You suggest there may be a few among them that they are legal? Prove it. You have 15 minutes. Further, some may be unfairly sent home? Well, they should not have been where they were (mixed in with illegal aliens?) to subject themselves to the roundup. They all saw it coming. Hey, Pablo, you can always come back and prove yourself at the Border? Too much common sense for you libs, I fear.
Don't get your sports events comment. I think that you still think that the government, Title IX, whatever, should be sure women should not be assaulted, and other things, by boys or men. (Don't mention the gendertran thing, I don't even know what that is,,,,,,,,and it is TOTALLY irrelevant.0 YUOu are getting like Sonhouse with his Trump Documents threads. Geez.
I find it ironic that your last para uses the word 'attack'.
If you were asked which of liberals or democrats attack people and property, which one would it be.
Don't believe I'da said attack...no sir. Not to victims of attacks like us. I think I will go out and see if my car has been keyed.