@AverageJoe1 saidEvery American should reject the oligarchy taking over the government. It has nothing to do with border security.
I've said my peace. Why don't y'all just put him in a beach chair with a book, and open the borders again.
Lockheed is a public company with a mandate from shareholders to spend money in best interest of their investors. They are spending money to build the presidents house. It's not charity, it's a bribe.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidYou imply that military contracts were awarded in exchange for buying (Trump, president) a 'new house'. That is what you are saying. Try writing like an adult, factual, so a normal person like me can respond. As it stands, your post makes no sense. nothing new.
Hardly any of what you just wrote has the slightest thing to do with what we were discussing.
Are you saying that it's ok to award military contracts in exchange for buying the president a new house?
Stop beating around the bush. Be straight, mate.
Hey, get this,,,,talk about the conflicts of you liberals. Shav says today that people should be paid depending on their responsibilty, to which I answered, absolutely!!
But here is the kicker....he says he is a communist and, like you, also says that no one should make more money than the next guy. Ha, I cant even fomulate a sentence to say what he is saying. What a goober.
2 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidOh my, I imagine that board meeting at Lockheed (long table, lots of men in suits) where someone tries to make the argument that they're going to use $$ millions of shareholder investment money to build a new house for the president with no return on investment.
You imply that military contracts were awarded in exchange for buying (Trump, president) a 'new house'. That is what you are saying. Try writing like an adult, factual, so a normal person like me can respond. As it stands, your post makes no sense. nothing new.
Hey, get this,,,,talk about the conflicts of you liberals. Shav says today that people should be paid ...[text shortened]... y than the next guy. Ha, I cant even fomulate a sentence to say what he is saying. What a goober.
You think it's charity? Coming from shareholders? At $485 a share?
@wildgrass saidYou look weird when you dream up a scenario then argue it as if it’s true 😂
Oh my, I imagine that board meeting at Lockheed (long table, lots of men in suits) where someone tries to make the argument that they're going to use $$ millions of shareholder investment money to build a new house for the president with no return on investment.
You think it's charity? Coming from shareholders? At $485 a share?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou think it's charity? Shareholders of companies that compete for military contracts build Trump a new house out of the goodness of their hearts?
You look weird when you dream up a scenario then argue it as if it’s true 😂
@wildgrass saidYou should stop referring to it as a "home". In truth, it's a monstrous, decadent ballroom for parties about 40 times larger than the median home in the US and nearly twice the size of the entire existing White House.
You think it's charity? Shareholders of companies that compete for military contracts build Trump a new house out of the goodness of their hearts?
No one will ever live there and it's highly likely it will only be used for state dinners and such a handful of times a year. It's a totally unnecessary vanity project dreamed up by Trump and funded by bribes.
@no1marauder saidJust think how many more rubbers we could have sent to afrika with this money
You should stop referring to it as a "home". In truth, it's a monstrous, decadent ballroom for parties about 40 times larger than the median home in the US and nearly twice the size of the entire existing White House.
No one will ever live there and it's highly likely it will only be used for state dinners and such a handful of times a year. It's a totally unnecessary vanity project dreamed up by Trump and funded by bribes.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidWouldn't you rather have Lockheed spending tax money building weapons instead of bribing trump?
Just think how many more rubbers we could have sent to afrika with this money
@wildgrass saidNah, Trump deserves his cut too !
Wouldn't you rather have Lockheed spending tax money building weapons instead of bribing trump?
@wildgrass saidWait, are you suggesting that you should weigh in on the decisions of a board of a corporation. They can do anything that they want to legally, and if a shareholder does not like it, they can sell their shares. I cannot believe how stupid you are. Oh, maybe as a socialist, you think the government should step in. They most certainly should not.
Oh my, I imagine that board meeting at Lockheed (long table, lots of men in suits) where someone tries to make the argument that they're going to use $$ millions of shareholder investment money to build a new house for the president with no return on investment.
You think it's charity? Coming from shareholders? At $485 a share?
Not a suit guy, are you? I certainly wear them when it gives me some advantage. I recommend it.
It’s all a game, little feller. Trump games every day. It works. I am curious how he will win the beef deal and make our ranchers whole
@AverageJoe1 saidYah, it's a bribe though. C'mon. You're not that gullible?
Wait, are you suggesting that you should weigh in on the decisions of a board of a corporation. They can do anything that they want to legally, and if a shareholder does not like it, they can sell their shares. I cannot believe how stupid you are. Oh, maybe as a socialist, you think the government should step in. They most certainly should not.
Not a suit guy, are ...[text shortened]... mp games every day. It works. I am curious how he will win the beef deal and make our ranchers whole
@no1marauder saidYou people seem nonplussed about what your reps have done, shutting down govt…..only concerned with your queer discontent with the legit ballroom, which BTW, is quite necessary. When AOC becomes Pres in 2026, she will be building one at OUR expense to party her barroom buddies from Queens. So why not get it done now? Free? Oh,,,,,,,,Trump. TDS. An impt consideration .
You should stop referring to it as a "home". In truth, it's a monstrous, decadent ballroom for parties about 40 times larger than the median home in the US and nearly twice the size of the entire existing White House.
No one will ever live there and it's highly likely it will only be used for state dinners and such a handful of times a year. It's a totally unnecessary vanity project dreamed up by Trump and funded by bribes.
And do it now before it ends up with the name on it like Cortez, Ortega, or something like that. And then the next president will be.Jonansphur Singh Parkavaksr Hasshat
You don’t care about govt and what it is doing. Watch our news channels, get the real news.
@AverageJoe1
Maybe marauder will tell us first do we need to have a ballroom, since they are putting yard chairs out there and having dignitaries walk on the grass to find a restroom, under a tent, or should we have a new ballroom. After he agrees, we have a new ballroom, tell us what he thinks the ballroom should look like,, how big he thinks it should be, how ornate it should be. Instead of bitching all the time, why don’t liberals put some positive statements out about the future of our world.? Frankly, it is impossible to do so because every time they say something about it, they always have to hinge their comments on what other people think and what other people do or should do or should not think. It is always about other people with liberals. They cannot stand alone.