Originally posted by telerion
Ignoring the obvious exaggeration in your interpretation of his remarks, what's actually wrong about Obama's point?
Since the Industrial Revolution, advances in technology have reduced our dependence on manual labor.
Obama's an idiot. 1) ATM machines need to be assembled. 2) ATM machines need to be serviced. 3) ATM machines need to be programmed The invention and proliferation of ATM machines created far more jobs than they "cost". Obama hasn't the foggiest idea how the private sector operates, and he obviously thinks that no one else does either. But just because a bank has an ATM machine, it doesn't mean that they got rid of teller positions.
To use ATMs as an example of why there aren't any jobs out there is just idiotic.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, there were about 600,500 tellers in the U.S (in 2008). That number was (according to BLS) expected to grow by 37,000 over the next 8 years.
Also,
http://politisite.com/2011/06/16/fact-check-are-there-less-bank-tellers-because-of-atm-machines/
1985: Number of ATM machines = 60,000
1985: Number of tellers = 485,000
2002: Number of ATM machines = 352,000
2002: Number of tellers = 527,000
Obama obviously has no understanding of how a bank actually operates. Not surprising, really...he has no understanding of how ANYTHING operates.
But only an idiot would suggest that ATM machines have led to a loss of teller jobs.
btw, ATM machines also require that someone put the money in there. That person is, very often, a teller (actually, two tellers, since everything would be under dual control).