Originally posted by shavixmirOk, i'll ask again, what's the difference between this guy and der schwarze Ritter? One gets banned, the other continues trolling.
http://story.michigansun.com/index.php/ct/9/cid/154063713fe5da1f/id/490383/cs/1/
[i]Amsterdam (The Netherlands), Apr.16 : A fake jury that exonerated Osama bin Laden from the Sept. 11 terror attacks on America following a televised mock trial on a popular Dutch program has sent out a "disturbing" message to the world and could fuel conspiracy theories, ...[text shortened]... s and murder thousands of women and children.
I know who I'd find guilty.
Originally posted by FMFstraw man.
You think this is a communist web site with communist moderators? Is THAT why you think DSR is no longer with us?
I never said this was a communist site, nor did I say all mods were communist.
I only pointed out that some mods are biased, which may have result in unfairness when dealing with DSR's ban.
1 edit
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenDo you want me to alert them for you? I never the use the function (except one time). If you feel strongly about it I don't see why I couldn't put your ideas forward for you.
i don't think non-subscribers can alert mods, atleast i don't see that option..
What would be the content of the alert notification? Give me the words I should send.
(I advise against the "he was banned because he was NOT a communist" complaint, as that comes across a wee bit daft)
1 edit
Originally posted by generalissimoYou're having a tiny bit of trouble with the meaning of 'strawman', I think.
straw man, again.
I never claimed such thing. There are some mods who are biased, but the website itself doesn't have communist sympathies.
You said DSR was banned because he was not a communist. And that shavixmir hasn't been banned because he is a communist.
Now, it's you who has introduced accusations of communism into this whole thing, not me.
People are not banned by moderators. They are banned by the web site. How do you think the communist moderators (that you have mentioned) get this "ban him because he's not a communist" thing past the site adminsitrators?
Originally posted by FMFHow about trolling with the same anti-american crap with his only pseudo-proof being a web link. Or maybe for personally attacking people although the following post in this thread was very mild for him:
Do you want me to alert them for you? I never the use the function (except one time). If you feel strongly about it I don't see why I couldn't put your ideas forward for you.
What would be the content of the alert notification? Give me the words I should send.
(I advise against the "he was banned because he was NOT a communist" complaint, as that comes across a wee bit daft)
"No moron.
The second part of the post was about putting Bin Laden on trial.
Hitler was found guilty at Nuremberg."
Originally posted by FMFI said DSR was banned for no reason, his posts weren't more extremist than scherzo or shav's for example.
You're having a tiny bit of trouble with the meaning of 'strawman', I think.
You said DSR was banned because he was not a communist. And that shavixmir hasn't been banned because he is a communist.
Now, it's you who has introduced accusations of communism into this whole thing, not me.
People are not banned by moderators. They are banned by the web site ...[text shortened]... ned) get this "ban him because he's not a communist" thing past the site adminsitrators?
Now, it's you who has introduced accusations of communism into this whole thing, not me.
you misunderstood me. Shav is a communist, and some mods are biased, that is a fact. I never said there was some communist conspiracy.
Why do you think DSR ban was good but scherzo and shav should not be banned?
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenActually, you're trolling in this thread by bringing up DSR (it's off-topic). You already have your DSR thread to rave about how "unfair" the Site Admins were to ban him from the Forums (Mods can't give a permanent ban).
How about trolling with the same anti-american crap with his only pseudo-proof being a web link. Or maybe for personally attacking people although the following post in this thread was very mild for him:
"No moron.
The second part of the post was about putting Bin Laden on trial.
Hitler was found guilty at Nuremberg."
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenThe word "moron" is relatively tame around here. It's used by people on all parts of the spectrum, including "pro-Americans".
How about trolling with the same anti-american crap with his only pseudo-proof being a web link. Or maybe for personally attacking people although the following post in this thread was very mild for him:
"No moron.
The second part of the post was about putting Bin Laden on trial.
Hitler was found guilty at Nuremberg."
Hitler WAS found guilty at Nuremberg. So I don't think I will get mucg traction (on your behalf) with that.
I think shavaxmir's point was that some documentary-reconstruction thing on Dutch TV. Something about Obama not being brought to justice.
I reckon I need more than this Nimz. Trawl back through his posting history, maybe?