Go back
Results?

Results?

Debates


@mott-the-hoople said
just cant quite get the hang of the electoral college can you? 😂
You can't seem to understand what its original purpose was.

But anyway in 7 of the last 8 Presidential elections more Americans have voted for the Democratic candidate than the Republican one. What conclusions do you draw from that fact?


Biden's pulled ahead in Michigan and his lead should steadily increase.

Doesn't look like Trump's pulling a rabbit out of his hat this time.


@cheesemaster said
Still looking like a Biden win.
Close yes, but I still think Biden wins.

I'm the guy who said Hillary would crush Trump so what do I know 🙄
Yes, and it looks like you are jumping on your crank again 😛


@shavixmir said
How can lawyers stop voted that have been cast from being counted?

Surely that is interfering with the democratic system and should have the laywers sent down for 20 years hard labour.
They did it in 2000.


This may be settled in the courts.

Thank God Amy Coney Barrett is now presiding.


This is looking more and more like a Biden victory.


@no1marauder said
Biden's pulled ahead in Michigan and his lead should steadily increase.

Doesn't look like Trump's pulling a rabbit out of his hat this time.
If Biden wins Michigan and Wisconsin, then he only needs Nevada and can afford to lose Pennsylvania.

Trump needs Pennsylvania and any of one of Michigan, Wisconsin or Nevada. Of course, it's all over if he loses PA.

Bar a sudden comeback in the Midwest, Nevada is his last hope. It looks tight there!


@earl-of-trumps said
This may be settled in the courts.

Thank God Amy Coney Barrett is now presiding.
why ?


@earl-of-trumps said
This may be settled in the courts.

Thank God Amy Coney Barrett is now presiding.
Good news if you like the smell of a burning SCOTUS. Do you seriously think it’s a good idea for SCOTUS to steal an election for the POTUS that appointed them?


@kevcvs57 said
Good news if you like the smell of a burning SCOTUS. Do you seriously think it’s a good idea for SCOTUS to steal an election for the POTUS that appointed them?
you dont want the rule of law to apply?

1 edit

@earl-of-trumps said
This may be settled in the courts.

Thank God Amy Coney Barrett is now presiding.
last time I looked (and I did a few seconds before just to be on the safe side) John Roberts was Chief Justice and if anyone is presiding it will be him.


@ponderable said
last time I looked (and I did a few seconds before just to be on the safe side) John Roberts was Chief Justice and if anyone is presiding it will be him.
his vote doesnt count any more than the others


@mott-the-hoople said
his vote doesnt count any more than the others
I was Talking About "presiding".

1 edit

@mott-the-hoople said
you dont want the rule of law to apply?
Of course, so let first people run the prescribed course.

If one contestant claims a win before the votes have been counted and invokes the court, it is a bit disturbing.


@mott-the-hoople said
you dont want the rule of law to apply?
Yes but laws cannot be invented in retrospect to suit politically partisan wish lists.
The dictator trump demanded that the counting be stopped at about est because he noticed he was winning in enough states, oh but not the states he was losing in, they had to keep counting. 😂