Right Wingers: Don't Read this Article

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂
so you are saying a [b] Yale law professor[/B] is wrong and you are right. 😂

BTW, impersonating a lawyer is a felony in new york state.
😉

Are you ever going to read the article cited in the OP so you can discuss it or are you just going to keep trying to change the subject?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂
so you are saying a [b] Yale law professor[/B] is wrong and you are right. 😂

BTW, impersonating a lawyer is a felony in new york state.
😉

A conviction leads to sentencing.

So, if someone is not convicted, he won’t be eligable for sentencing. See?

So, before you go spewing forth that right-wing propaganda, stop and think for a second.

For example, what does convicted mean?
From the Oxford dictionary: “having officially been found guilty of a crime in a law court.”

So, convicted means: found guilty.
It has nothing to do with sentencing, other than that you need a conviction to move on to sentencing.

And I ain’t no lawyer. So, if your Yale source actually said what you say he says, he’s wrong. But, considering the definitions are really, really, really simple to grasp, I would presume that Yale lawyer said nothing of the sort.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
legally Trump is not a convicted felon yet dumbass

Wow, so dumb you argue something else entirely, since you can't grok the post you replied to.

@Mott-The-Hoople said
“ So you are telling that BS to an accredited New York attorney. ”

nah, i gave him the chance to state if he was an attorney or not…he didn’t say he was…shytweaseld around it

its funny tho 😂

you libs whole damned life is pretend isn’t it?

Oh, the irony.

@no1marauder said
If a Yale law professor says someone who is convicted of a felony in New York State criminal courts isn't a convicted felon until he sentenced, he's wrong.

😂 you hopeless pos 😂

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂 you hopeless pos 😂

Do you ever understand anything said to you?

I mean anything more meaningful than "Want another beer?"

@Mott-The-Hoople said
😂 you hopeless pos 😂

A conviction leads to sentencing.

So, if someone is not convicted, he won’t be eligable for sentencing. See?

So, before you go spewing forth that right-wing propaganda, stop and think for a second.

For example, what does convicted mean?
From the Oxford dictionary: “having officially been found guilty of a crime in a law court.”

So, convicted means: found guilty.
It has nothing to do with sentencing, other than that you need a conviction to move on to sentencing.

And I ain’t no lawyer. So, if your Yale source actually said what you say he says, he’s wrong. But, considering the definitions are really, really, really simple to grasp, I would presume that Yale lawyer said nothing of the sort.

@shavixmir said
A conviction leads to sentencing.

So, if someone is not convicted, he won’t be eligable for sentencing. See?

So, before you go spewing forth that right-wing propaganda, stop and think for a second.

For example, what does convicted mean?
From the Oxford dictionary: “having officially been found guilty of a crime in a law court.”

So, convicted means: found guilty ...[text shortened]... e really, really, really simple to grasp, I would presume that Yale lawyer said nothing of the sort.

"And I ain’t no lawyer. (your buddy isnt either) So, if your Yale source actually said what you say he says, he’s wrong.'


LOL

seems your little boy lawyer stepped in it this time

LMFAO

@Mott-The-Hoople said
"And I ain’t no lawyer. (your buddy isnt either) So, if your Yale source actually said what you say he says, he’s wrong.'


LOL

seems your little boy lawyer stepped in it this time

LMFAO

Did you even read what I wrote?
You’re just mumbling BS.

Yes. trump is a convicted felon. End of.

Edit:

Seriously. Are you really retarded? I don’t want to take the pish if you are, but you seriously don’t seem to grasp what I posted, the gist of it (you don’t need to be a lawyer to comprehend English) or even understand thar I quoted directly from a dictionary.

Convicted = found guilty in a court of law.
It has nothing to do with sentencing.

Sweet Jesus almighty.

@shavixmir said
Did you even read what I wrote?
You’re just mumbling BS.

Yes. trump is a convicted felon. End of.

Edit:

Seriously. Are you really retarded? I don’t want to take the pish if you are, but you seriously don’t seem to grasp what I posted, the gist of it (you don’t need to be a lawyer to comprehend English) or even understand thar I quoted directly from a dictionary.
...[text shortened]... ed = found guilty in a court of law.
It has nothing to do with sentencing.

Sweet Jesus almighty.

a court of law includes the judge, the process is not complete until the judge signs off on it…end of story

juries have found people guilty before only for the judge to go against them

your little lawyer boy forgot that part lol

https://www.brienrochelaw.com/legal-faqs/can-a-judge-overturn-a-jury-verdict/

@Mott-The-Hoople said
a court of law includes the judge, the process is not complete until the judge signs off on it…end of story

juries have found people guilty before only for the judge to go against them

your little lawyer boy forgot that part lol

https://www.brienrochelaw.com/legal-faqs/can-a-judge-overturn-a-jury-verdict/

Don’t be daft now.
Only the sentencing is yet to happen.

God damn. Grow up!

@Mott-The-Hoople said
a court of law includes the judge, the process is not complete until the judge signs off on it…end of story

juries have found people guilty before only for the judge to go against them

your little lawyer boy forgot that part lol

https://www.brienrochelaw.com/legal-faqs/can-a-judge-overturn-a-jury-verdict/

I didn't forget it at all; Trump's lawyers made that motion right after Judge Merchan discharged the jury and he denied it:

"Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche moved for an acquittal of the charges, notwithstanding the verdict. The judge denied the motion."

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-trial-05-30-24/index.html

It's the sub-article time stamped 1:56 PM EDT June 7, 2024.

@no1marauder said
I didn't forget it at all; Trump's lawyers made that motion right after Judge Merchan discharged the jury and he denied it:

"Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche moved for an acquittal of the charges, notwithstanding the verdict. The judge denied the motion."

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-hush-money-trial-05-30-24/index.html

It's the sub-article time stamped 1:56 PM EDT June 7, 2024.

merchan is not the only one this can be appealed to dumbass.

I expect this will go directly to SCOTUS to prevent the election interference aspect.

glad I could bring you up to speed on how our laws work

@shavixmir said
Don’t be daft now.
Only the sentencing is yet to happen.

God damn. Grow up!

ignorance

@Suzianne said
Do you ever understand anything said to you?

I mean anything more meaningful than "Want another beer?"

why do I smell rotten fish