"That is not a crime" clarified

@suzianne said
How embarrassing. You realize you said that out loud, right?

ZZZZZZZZZ. See what I mean?

@mott-the-hoople said
what do you think should be done about the 17 officials that lied about Trump on Russia collusion?

Or about Clinton creating the fake Russia dossier?

Or the officials that lied about hunters laptop?

I think they should get the same treatment as Taylor Swift for appearing at the Super Bowl and cheering for the Chiefs. That was totally unfair.

@spruce112358 said
I think they should get the same treatment as Taylor Swift for appearing at the Super Bowl and cheering for the Chiefs. That was totally unfair.

Oh, a subtle dodge. I almost missed it.

@averagejoe1 said
https://reason.com/2024/04/15/alvin-bragg-says-trump-tried-to-conceal-another-crime-what-crime/

This is simple-to-read, ( No Marauder Links!!) The Trial For Dummies (I made that up).

Here is the last paragraph, if you are worn out from SHouse posts. It makes the point.

""After taking a long, hard look at potential state charges against Trump stemming from the pay ...[text shortened]... and treating it as 34 felonies stretches the bounds of credulity as well as the bounds of the law.""

Dear Joe - Quoting a grand total of one (1) carefully handpicked fringe website clarifies absolutely nothing.

If Trump is as squeaky clean as he claims, this trial should be no big deal, so let the legal process work Joe, it's worked reasonably well for nearly 250 years. 😲

@mchill said
Dear Joe - Quoting a grand total of one (1) carefully handpicked fringe website clarifies absolutely nothing.

If Trump is as squeaky clean as he claims, this trial should be no big deal, so let the legal process work Joe, it's worked reasonably well for nearly 250 years. 😲

This little feller is suggesting that the Forum Not Weigh In on the trial(s) of Trump. We are out of line to discuss it, we are to let the legal process work.
He, or she, is telling me, and thus everyone, to refrain from discussing the trial of Donald Trump, and to let the legal process play out.
That is hard to believe, so maybe he will come back and rephrase what he said and apologize for once again clouding up the forum.

@AverageJoe1
Hey, Trump IS innocent until proven guilty. That said the evidence is overwhelming and you know good and well this latest case if proven to be a bunch of felonies will never have T in prison, most likely probation and maybe an ankle bracelet. Which would piss off Trump much more than jail time because he would use jail time as proving he is a martyr thinking he will get brownie points from his base.
BTW, why didn't you show up in NY to add to the four who were already there quietly supporting X45? You worship him so put your money where your mouth is and go to protest the witch hunt along with the other four who were there.

@AverageJoe1
Keeping information about long term mistress and short term porn star which would have turned some people off from voting for Trump is called ELECTION INTERFERENCE and THAT is illegal and hiding all the money given out is also illegal which explains why there are 34 felony charges ongoing as we speak against your god Trump.

@averagejoe1 said
Shav, that sue person would tell you to quit spamming the thread.....but you and she are the same. Very confusingly conflicting.

Stop presuming to speak for me.

@averagejoe1 said
Child, the dossier, which was proven to have been bought and paid for by Hillary, was fabricated. You can find it all over google. Authored by crook Christopher Steele.

Any 'lies' about the laptop, if there were any, are quite moot now, would you not agree? Why waste computer ink and our reading comprehension on something like that. I have not even availed myself of Trumphouse posts yet.

Paid for by Hillary. Authored by Steele, who was in intelligence. The dossier was real. It existed.

The only worth of Republican lies is that they are evidence of prior attempts to buffalo the American people.

@averagejoe1 said
Sue, you referred to me TEN times, personally, in this post. Pitiful debating. Imagine debating in your High School debate class, the judges getting weary listening to that. They would forget the issue. And give you an F.
Stick to the Advent of Pronouns, which We dont understand, but it may help you settle.

It speaks to your motivation, and why you continue spewing lies in this forum.

But you knew that, so you obfuscate, just like your Orange Jesus.

@suzianne said
Paid for by Hillary. Authored by Steele, who was in intelligence. The dossier was real. It existed.

The only worth of Republican lies is that they are evidence of prior attempts to buffalo the American people.

just plain stupid..it was fake, your lying pos clinton paid for it...

all you can say is it existed? stupid, plain stupid

@averagejoe1 said
ZZZZZZZZZ. See what I mean?

No. Please elucidate on that.

@averagejoe1 said
Oh, a subtle dodge. I almost missed it.

He's a semi-conservative. You'll have to excuse him.

@averagejoe1 said
This little feller is suggesting that the Forum Not Weigh In on the trial(s) of Trump. We are out of line to discuss it, we are to let the legal process work.
He, or she, is telling me, and thus everyone, to refrain from discussing the trial of Donald Trump, and to let the legal process play out.
That is hard to believe, so maybe he will come back and rephrase what he said and apologize for once again clouding up the forum.

Are you Waa-waa-yo-mama?

You speak of "weighing in" yet you spent how much text excoriating me for doing the same? Maybe grow up and take your medicine.

Oh, and stop the childish "he or she" baloney.

@mott-the-hoople said
just plain stupid..it was fake, your lying pos clinton paid for it...

all you can say is it existed? stupid, plain stupid

It was fake?

If it was fake, why did Hillary pay for nothing? The dossier was very real. It existed. Are you stupid? All you can say is fake? It wasn't fake. It was real documentation.

You could hold it in your hand. Do you understand what "fake" actually means?

Stop using Trump-speak. It makes you sound like an idiot.