22 Mar '10 03:10>
Again, it is realized. Reform is needed. It is best that we all hope that this package works, because to hope that it fails is hoping that this country suffers.
Originally posted by Hugh GlassDon't forget the mess that is the Department of Education.
To President Obama and all 535 voting members of the Legislature,
It is now official you are ALL corrupt morons:
* The U.S. Post Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right and it is broke.
* Social Securitywas established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right and it is broke.
* Fannie Mae was established ...[text shortened]... irst determine, just how success can be measured, what bench mark do we set for health care?
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperIt has a host of provisions which lead inevitably to a single payer system. Its design is to kill off what is left of the private sector in health care.
Before I even address your list of "failed" government programs, let's get down to your question.
"AND YOU WANT AMERICANS TO BELIEVE YOU CAN BE TRUSTED WITH A GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM?? "
The bill does NOT have a government run health care system anywhere in it. That is not an opinion. It is a fact.
Originally posted by normbenignIf that is true we can all rejoice. I see absolutely no reason to continue to support companies that prosper by abusing the sick by sending them to the curb. Tell me please how health insurance companies at all embellish people or the country. They offer no product, rather they are thieves amd pimps that only offer any fondness when they can prosper from you.
It has a host of provisions which lead inevitably to a single payer system. Its design is to kill off what is left of the private sector in health care.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraBy what measure?
The welfare state in western and northern Europe was established in the early 20th century. It has been an astounding success.
Originally posted by no1marauderFirst the argued notion that high taxes, and an increasing deficit are mutually exclusive is pure folly.
I wish you right wing nuts would make up your minds; is health care reform going to raise taxes so high it kills the economy OR raise the deficit so much we're drowning forever in red ink? It can't do both like you claim it will (often in the same post).
How come universal health care has been sustainable for more than 50 years in virtually every other advanced country, but is unsustainable in ours?
Originally posted by badmoonThis is yet another step toward Statism. The American people lose the biggest and most important thing they have had, liberty. The tenth amendment is hanging by a thread.
Today the American people finally win.
Originally posted by badmoonYou clearly don't understand insurance. Most Americans are covered well by insurance companies.
If that is true we can all rejoice. I see absolutely no reason to continue to support companies that prosper by abusing the sick by sending them to the curb. Tell me please how health insurance companies at all embellish people or the country. They offer no product, rather they are thieves amd pimps that only offer any fondness when they can prosper from you.
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperRequiring the purchase of insurance. Fines for companies which drop health care. Requiring insurers to cover pre existing conditions.
A host of provisions such as?
Originally posted by normbenignOK, so you're saying the Republican's idea for an individual mandate to purchase health insurance is the road to single payer?
Requiring the purchase of insurance. Fines for companies which drop health care. Requiring insurers to cover pre existing conditions.
If the fine is $1000, and the coverage is $2000, why would anyone buy insurance? Wait until you are sick and then pay the higher amount. Classical adverse selection or moral risk.
Originally posted by normbenignAll nonsense, but believed in like some twisted religion by right wing nuts. Keep repeating your loony shibboleths over and over again; maybe you'll convince yourself.
First the argued notion that high taxes, and an increasing deficit are mutually exclusive is pure folly.
All taxation is harmful to economic activity. The higher the taxation, the greater the harm. As tax rates grow, receipts tend to diminish, economic activity slows down, and deficits grow.
Sustainable doesn't equal best possible. Universal is a cruel lie. Rationing is a reality.