3 edits
@mike69 saidDid you watch Trump explain why he doesn't care about all the blatant security "lapses" that led up to this? How were there more than 100 officers on the scene and only the spectators noticed this weird guy with a gun on a roof?
I agree, with part of what you’re sayings and add which party was in control at the time and would have loved to see him dead, now and then especially since he was going to win??? I’ve watched trump say exactly what happened to his ear, let me know if you want the link, your bs media twist your mind.
Did you watch Trump explain why he asked for his shoes first thing after being shot? Why he and security stood there on stage for 10 seconds to take a photo while they supposedly didn't know if the shooter was still out there?
Did you watch Trump explain the lack of an investigation into it? The absence of any discipline for the officers on scene? The failure to close the loop on strategies for future rallies? The fact this was the only rally he did where counter-snipers were even on the scene?
If you've ever seen footage of other presidential assassination attempts, the president is in the car in seconds. This scene were so casual and slow, ignoring the shooter, letting him shoot, it is such a bizarre incident it is hard to argue that it was not staged.
@mike69 saidYou only need half a brain to see instantly that this was staged. It was called a fake shooting from the minute the story broke. No one gets shot by a sniper and then stands around for the photo op.
No one said a bullet hole, did cnn tell you that??? What was said was that it grazed his ear. Have you even shot a gun or own any, you sure talk like an expert😂.
He gets grazed by a .223 and there would be a scar or a scab or something but the ear was photographed a few days later with zero evidence of an injury.
@wildgrass saidTell that to the families of the people that died, you don’t think the libs would have picked that apart, especially the haters who were in power. You need help!
You only need half a brain to see instantly that this was staged. It was called a fake shooting from the minute the story broke. No one gets shot by a sniper and then stands around for the photo op.
He gets grazed by a .223 and there would be a scar or a scab or something but the ear was photographed a few days later with zero evidence of an injury.
@wildgrass saidYou wouldn’t see truth if it hit you over the head.
You don't think the families deserve the truth?
@mike69 saidWhat about if a large caliber sniper round "nicked" the edge of my ear and caused a lot of blood loss but caused no scarring and was 100% healed in 47 hours? Would I see it then?
You wouldn’t see truth if it hit you over the head.
What if I took a bullet, got up slowly, slipped back into my shoes, hung out for a photograph and a fist bump, and then looked around and wondered who was shooting at me?
@AThousandYoung saidRoosevelt was giving a speech in an active shooters line of fire?
A .223 is not a large caliber sniper round.
Roosevelt gave a speech with a bullet in his chest.
@wildgrass saidI don't know what you're suggesting. Trump's shooter was neutralized in four seconds after he started firing.
Roosevelt was giving a speech in an active shooters line of fire?
1 edit
@AThousandYoung saidRight. Did the counter sniper know there was a dude with a gun on that roof before he started firing and just do nothing? Or did he hear, spot, whip around and site his cranium in that time? Both scenarios seem implausible. Has that guy ever been debriefed?
I don't know what you're suggesting. Trump's shooter was neutralized in four seconds after he started firing.
Secret service at that time had no clue if the shooter was neutralized, if there were others, etc. They just let him stand there?
@mike69 removed their quoted postDon't kid yourself? You're trying to tell me that round can nick an ear and do no damage.
I mentioned it earlier, but ears are notoriously slow to heal. A sewing needle in the ear takes 3 months to heal, and still leaves a visible scar/wound.
Trump's ear was not hit by that bullet. Impossible.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidIt nicked it moron.
Don't kid yourself? You're trying to tell me that round can nick an ear and do no damage.
I mentioned it earlier, but ears are notoriously slow to heal. A sewing needle in the ear takes 3 months to heal, and still leaves a visible scar/wound.
Trump's ear was not hit by that bullet. Impossible.
2 edits
@mike69 saidImpossible or extremely unlikely. Nick would be less than the damage caused by a sewing needle? A staged assassination explains it better and explains all the other inconsistencies in the story. The conspiracy is thinking this was a legitimate assassination attempt.
It nicked it fuking moron.