2 edits
@no1marauder saidthe jury did decide.
Just because right wingers like yourself rejoice every time a black man is killed doesn't make it justified under the law.
The case was rightfully prosecuted and it is up to the jury to decide.
I see the racial implications worked with you, as it will with all lefties…the whole reason for the prosecution
@no1marauder saidOf course, and nice to see a poster recognize an issue at hand, but I have simply said, no matter what the outcome, that even if I were a boxer and karate expert,.there is no way that I would step to the aid of someone where I would be subject to being in any way found guilty of anything. Guess I would be a bystander, perhaps be careful to not lose my ipods.
People who rely on articles or talking heads in the media for their facts get nowhere near enough information compared to a jury at a trial to criticize the latter.
The case is about excessive force, not about whether anyone should be "helped" or not. The law sets limits on the use of force.
The 'law' has made a big mistake. And further this clueless inadeqate judge has stepped out of his purview, I know that and am not even a trial lawyer. He will be in trouble on this one.
I can't believe you find the guy guilty of something, anything. Hunter a good guy, though?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI answered the question before it was asked:
not on the jury any more than you are. I only asked you a question, your being afraid to answer is the answer.
no1: People who rely on articles or talking heads in the media for their facts get nowhere near enough information compared to a jury at a trial to criticize the latter.
@AverageJoe1 saidI didn't say he was guilty or not guilty.
Of course, and nice to see a poster recognize an issue at hand, but I have simply said, no matter what the outcome, that even if I were a boxer and karate expert,.there is no way that I would step to the aid of someone where I would be subject to being in any way found guilty of anything. Guess I would be a bystander, perhaps be careful to not lose my ipods.
The 'law ...[text shortened]... one.
I can't believe you find the guy guilty of something, anything. Hunter a good guy, though?
2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidNo, it hasn't.
the jury did decide.
I see the racial implications worked with you, as it will with all lefties…the whole reason for the prosecution
They said they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but the criminally negligent homicide charge is still before the jury.
Few right wingers would be crying about this trial IF Penny had killed a white man; trials involving whether excessive force was used are commonplace in the US.
@no1marauder saidI read this as your making a prosecutor's argument.
FYI:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2024/12/06/daniel-penny-jordan-neely-subway-trial-verdict/76476419007/
Penny's extremely fortunate the jury couldn't agree on the manslaughter charge; he held Neely in a chokehold for almost 6 minutes and refused to let go even though another passenger told him so because Neely wasn't moving.
@no1marauder saidAnd, I read this as your making the prosecutor's argument.
No, it hasn't.
They said they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but the criminally negligent homicide charge is still before the jury.
Few right wingers would be crying about this trial IF Penny had killed a white man; trials involving whether excessive force was used are commonplace in the US.
Go ahead, serve the law, throw this punk in jail.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 said(Shrug) It's an undisputed fact according to the evidence presented at trial.
I read this as your making a prosecutor's argument.
@no1marauder saidwouldnt be a trial if it were a white man
No, it hasn't.
They said they were deadlocked on the manslaughter charge, but the criminally negligent homicide charge is still before the jury.
Few right wingers would be crying about this trial IF Penny had killed a white man; trials involving whether excessive force was used are commonplace in the US.
@Mott-The-Hoople saidAt least one politician is standing up for the guy, wants to give him a medal for heroism:
not on the jury any more than you are. I only asked you a question, your being afraid to answer is the answer.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/congressman-plans-daniel-penny-congressional-234838313.html
@Mott-The-Hoople saidI keep forgetting that right wingers are so deluded they think the US justice system is biased in favor of persons of color.
wouldnt be a trial if it were a white man
@Cliff-Mashburn saidThree guys restrained Neely with Penny jumping him from behind and holding him in a chokehold for 6 minutes.
At least one politician is standing up for the guy, wants to give him a medal for heroism:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/congressman-plans-daniel-penny-congressional-234838313.html
That's the right wing version of "heroism" these days?
@no1marauder saidPenny restrained him and then the other three jumped in to help keep him subdued.
Three guys restrained Neely with Penny jumping him from behind and holding him in a chokehold for 6 minutes.
That's the right wing version of "heroism" these days?
And the guy STILL was fighting and trying to escape..
@no1marauder saidonly liberal prosecuters…21 lib soros prosecuters got fored last election, bragg will probably be next…people get tired of violence being tolerated
I keep forgetting that right wingers are so deluded they think the US justice system is biased in favor of persons of color.
1 edit
@Mott-The-Hoople saidLike choking someone to death?
only liberal prosecuters…21 lib soros prosecuters got fored last election, bragg will probably be next…people get tired of violence being tolerated
The Medical Examiner said Neeley was choked to death and video showed that Penny held the chokehold for almost 6 minutes, including after Neeley was no longer resisting.
That's ample evidence to charge and a DA would have been derelict not to do so.