28 Nov '18 23:30>1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidUMM, wrong. Human societies formed long before there was such a massive diversity of labor. They formed for the mutual protection of all not so some elite could hold virtual life or death power over the rest by economic or political means.
Actually, google ‘17 States fund abortions.’
As to human society, simply put, each person in a ‘region’ has his own talent, if you will. Carpenter, bricklayer, potato grower, maker of bricks, computer maker, clothes maker, doctor, computer technician and so on. Boat builder. Car maker. Do they not have to all form a society (a community rather than isolation) in orde ...[text shortened]... ng to now change all of that, how about everybody getting a check from the government help me Rhonda
You seem to be laboring under the misconception that our present type of society i.e. a capitalist one based on private property is the only possible one. In fact, such societies are fairly recent aberrations.
The fact that these types of societies have allocated the vast majority of property to a relative few is the only reason that others must sell their labor to those owners to live. Given that society has made it possible for those relative few to have such overwhelming economic power it seems only reasonable to expect them to give back some of that benefit to fund societal needs. That is what progressive taxation and anti-poverty programs are all about.