Trump reveals classified information to Russia

😕😀

Originally posted by joe beyser
I thought bill did not have sex with that woman. He even said as much.

The real question is; why would you or anyone else care (other than his wife) if he got a BJ from that woman? Bill Clinton's exact words were: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." To me, getting a one time BJ from a woman who is begging to give you one is not having sexual relations with that woman. I guess it is a matter of opinion. Whom anyone else has consensual sex acts with is none of my business and I do not care. At least you could of came up with a better lie that he gave by saying "He smoked pot but never inhaled," If that is even possible. lol Furthermore, let's not forget that Newt Gingrich and Ken Star, who were the ones that led the impeachment against Bill over this issue, they were both having affairs on their wives at that time. Soon after, Newt Gingrich went to the hospital where his then wife was being treated for cancer, to tell her that he was leaving her for another woman, his current wife. Republican hypocrisy at it's best.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

It is exceedingly difficult to impeach a U.S. president. Unless an investigation reveals that Trump himself had direct contact with Russian agents to interfere with our election or he is found to have been directly involved in illegal acts such as money laundering which is often done through the sale of high end real estate and casinos, he will not be impeached especially since the GOP controls Congress. However, if GOP senators and representatives find that Trump is too incompetent for their taste, they might just go forth with impeachment. If they tried to impeach Clinton for a getting a blow job in the Oval Office by a woman over the age of 18, I'm quite sure there will be enough to sink The Donald. "High Crimes and Misdemeanors" leaves much to interpretation.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

I NEVER said Trump's revealing top secret info to the Russians was grounds for impeachment. Hopefully an independent investigation into a possible direct connection between Trump and Russia to undermine our election process will be pursued. He is just dumb enough to have actually had personal conversations or memos/emails that could directly implicate him.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

Ok., but the Americans hadn't intended to share the information Israel obtained from Pollard in the first place. Assuming it was Israel who provided the intelligence Trump shared with the Russians, they won't be happy about having their intelligence blabbed first to Lavrov and then the entire world's media.

Regarding impeachment, I read an opinion somewhere that Congress can impeach for whatever reason it wants. As I remember the argument was that Clinton's impeachment effectively set that precedent. Unless a process is successfully challenged in the Supreme Court he can be impeached for Twitter addiction.

The post that was quoted here has been removed

The relevant legal issue was *not* whether the sex act took place, but whether President Clinton committed perjury.
Perjury about what Duchess64? THE SEX ACT! Which was none of their damn business in the first place. It was all partisan and a set up from the word go. Horny Bill was to stupid to realize he was being set up and he fell for the bait. They should put Trump on the congressional stand and see if he commits perjury about all his sex acts. You know, like his golden showers in Russia. lol.

Originally posted by DeepThought
Ok., but the Americans hadn't intended to share the information Israel obtained from Pollard in the first place. Assuming it was Israel who provided the intelligence Trump shared with the Russians, they won't be happy about having their intelligence blabbed first to Lavrov and then the entire world's media.

Regarding impeachment, I read an opinion so ...[text shortened]... ocess is successfully challenged in the Supreme Court he can be impeached for Twitter addiction.

There has been a long and inconclusive debate among scholars and legal experts as to what would constitute "High crimes and misdemeanors" to justify the impeachment of a President (obviously treason and/or bribery would) and as to whether the SCOTUS could review an impeachment.