Go back
UK to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.

UK to send asylum seekers to Rwanda.

Debates



-Removed-
The latter is obviously correct.
The first is a dodgy statement. Why would they come over Europe to get to Britain?

The majority of refugees ask for asylum in the first country they arrive in.

It’s not like fleeing a country is fun or that people smugglers are nice people you want to hang around with.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Well let’s send them back to France then, simples

Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
That's quite a long way to row a boat, innit?
For boats read Chinese made ribs with outboard motors
They tend to be English speaking migrants who don’t like the French and can’t speak French
They are halfway English already

Vote Up
Vote Down

@kevcvs57 said
Well let’s send them back to France then, simples
Uh, no.
You can't.

They're requesting asylum in Britain, so Britain has the obligation to house them while they process the request.

And that's why Britain has thought up this marvelous plan to house them in Rwanda.
Like you do...

1 edit

@shavixmir said
It’s not illegal immigration if a refugee is requesting asylum. It’s international law.

90% of the problems jn the Middle-East and Africa were created by the West interfering there. One doesn’t presume the answer is in even more interference, eh.
Nonsense. People have a right to apply for asylum, and the receiving country can accept or reject as they see fit. There is no law that can force a country to accept asylum seekers.

100% of the problems in the MidEast and Africa or any part of the world for that matter is caused by stupidity, poor decision making and corruption. The interference by the Western colonial countries if anything helped them to set up themselves.

Maybe if you lived in one of those countries you wont be regurgitating sophomore college rubbish, and lame excuses about why African countries are poor.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@rajk999 said
Nonsense. People have a right to apply for asylum, and the receiving country can accept or reject as they see fit. There is no law that can force a country to accept asylum seekers.

100% of the problems in the MidEast and Africa or any part of the world for that matter is caused by stupidity, poor decision making and corruption. The interference by the Western colonial ...[text shortened]... t be regurgitating sophomore college rubbish, and lame excuses about why African countries are poor.
I didn’t say a country can’t reject an asylum request.

READ before blurting out nonsense.



Vote Up
Vote Down


1 edit


-Removed-
Is that much the same as refugees leaving Britain to go to Ireland, then?


-Removed-
Just because the EU is less corrupt than the UK, does not make it holy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.