Go back
WED 1 JUNE 2005 – Remove George Bush Day

WED 1 JUNE 2005 – Remove George Bush Day

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Why don't you ever bump up the old threads WITH THE EXACT SAME CONTENT up to the top, rather than always creating new threads every time???!
I had a thread and made some additional posts to it as I discovered a new site where to vote to impeach Bush and changed the address of the web-site with all the email addresses of the media and politicians.

However, one of the "moderators" decided that I was bumping the thread up on purpose, closed the thread and banned me.

I complained that this wasn't the case and that people like StarValleyWy could be accused of the same but don't have their threads closed and get banned. No reply was received.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
I had a thread and made some additional posts to it as I discovered a new site where to vote to impeach Bush and changed the address of the web-site with all the email addresses of the media and politicians.

However, one of the "moderators" decided that I was bumping the thread up on purpose, closed the thread and banned me.

I complained that this wasn ...[text shortened]... accused of the same but don't have their threads closed and get banned. No reply was received.
Oh, LOL, I should have guessed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
Oh, LOL, I should have guessed.
I'm not sure what you mean ?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
I'm not sure what you mean ?

/.\
.|.
.|.

(Whats that...bump)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by xxxenophobe

/.\
.|.
.|.

(Whats that...bump)
No, I mean it. Why is it that people like StarValleyWy could be accused of also appending additional information to their threads but don't have their threads closed and get banned ?

(StarValleyWy isn't the best example as he waffles on where-as I was adding a link to another web-site where you can vote to impeach Bush, etc)

Vote Up
Vote Down

stang, if your still online please go look at the last message on (bush)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jared gallegos
stang, if your still online please go look at the last message on (bush)
Hi Jared,

I'll have a look. Which post/thread/message are you referring to ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey, I never said 9-11 was right !

Please show me where I said anything like that !

If anything, I've fully sympathised with 9-11 victims and survivors but stressed that fighting violence with violence is not the answer and that, in the case of Iraq, it was even directed at the wrong people (somewhat like 9-11 was).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Well.... Good Luck with that.








































Chump! =0

Vote Up
Vote Down

What do you mean ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
Hey, I never said 9-11 was right !

Please show me where I said anything like that !

If anything, I've fully sympathised with 9-11 victims and survivors but stressed that fighting violence with violence is not the answer and that, in the case of Iraq, it was even directed at the wrong people (somewhat like 9-11 was).
no you are very carefull to not come right out and say it but when some one said that the world was now better off after the invasion of iraq you said "the same argument could be made for 9-11" how can you in good concious make that comparison?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by jared gallegos
no you are very carefull to not come right out and say it but when some one said that the world was now better off after the invasion of iraq you said "the same argument could be made for 9-11" how can you in good concious make that comparison?
9/11 was wrong
I have a friend who lives near ground zero and saw it himself
I was in a bar in Bali on 9/11 and met 2 people from New York
Fellow Australians died in that bar when it was blown up about a year later

What I meant was that terrorists could make the same arguement about 9/11, trying to point out the stupidity of 9/11 and invading Iraq.

How can the world be better off after the invasion when Iraq had no WMD's, 100000 people died and more suffer, and it's bred more terrorists ?
Violence leads to violence.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
9/11 was wrong
I have a friend who lives near ground zero and saw it himself
I was in a bar in Bali on 9/11 and met 2 people from New York
Fellow Australians died in that bar when it was blown up about a year later

What I meant was that ...[text shortened]... fer, and it's bred more terrorists ?
Violence leads to violence.
how is the world better off? well it stopped saddam, who was on his way to killing millions of ppl, and already killed around a half a million, And there are polls that tell us the Iraqis are Glad that the US came in,

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by flyUnity
how is the world better off? well it stopped saddam, who was on his way to killing millions of ppl, and already killed around a half a million, And there are polls that tell us the Iraqis are Glad that the US came in,
Really ?

There's also many hundreds of millions of people who feel alot less secure since America opted for violence.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
Really ?

There's also many hundreds of millions of people who feel alot less secure since America opted for violence.
you and who else? I think America feels more secure, and thats why we reelected GWB

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.