Originally posted by DelmerYou might call it a choice between two evils but Bush went way to far:
WED 1 JUNE 2005 – Remove George Bush Day ... and make Dick Cheney president.
- Personal financial interests in pipe lines and military equipment
- Lies to Americans regarding WMD's in Iraq
- Disempowered the UN
- 100000 dead in Iraq
- American soldiers dead
- Huge financial cost to America
Originally posted by STANGAre you kidding? Cheney wanted to finish the job that the other Bush began in 1992. He's even more hawkish than W.
You might call it a choice between two evils but Bush went way to far:
- Personal financial interests in pipe lines and military equipment
- Lies to Americans regarding WMD's in Iraq
- Disempowered the UN
- 100000 dead in Iraq
- American soldiers dead
- Huge financial cost to America
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemSuch will be the case until people put aside their apathy and speak with one voice.
Are you kidding? Cheney wanted to finish the job that the other Bush began in 1992. He's even more hawkish than W.
Referring to the opening post, their power can be demonstrated.
I was dead anti Bush and firmly believed he and his mates should have given the weapons inspectors the time they asked for to do their job.
But having read some of the stuff here I'm changing my mind. Your anti-bush propaganda is having a reverse effect.
Bush got a majority.. Folk who didn't vote don't count.
All the lying allegations were made about Blair too but they put him back in power.
Americans clearly and fairly re-elected their president as did Britains re-elect Blair. All the ravings in here about impeachment are as useless and obscene as a fart in a colander.
If you Stang had gone to Hyde Park (speakers) Corner as I earlier suggested you might have helped stop Blair's re-election.
Originally posted by Tirau DanOne wonders why your mind is so easily changed.
I was dead anti Bush and firmly believed he and his mates should have given the weapons inspectors the time they asked for to do their job.
But having read some of the stuff here I'm changing my mind. Your anti-bush propaganda is having a reverse effect.
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGI don't think your little campaign has a chance in hell, but feel free to waste the time trying...
Such will be the case until people put aside their apathy and speak with one voice.
Referring to the opening post, their power can be demonstrated.
Edit: Let's make a little wager. If Bush is out by July 1, I will not post on RHP forums for one month. If Bush remains in power, then you will not post on RHP forums for one month. Deal?
1 edit
Originally posted by STANGLol I haven't changed my mind at all yet ..I like to throw in some red herrings now and then.. You have to be careful how you call someone a liar etc. Try to post "facts" not accusations then let people pick up. If you just blaze away it will turn people away from your posts.
One wonders why your mind is so easily changed.
Just my outsiders unbiased onion truely. 😉
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemI can't take the wager. I'm not saying that the campaign will directly remove Bush but it aims to escalate the reasons for removing him in media and parliament. Have you looked at the vote to impeach Bush sites, per my opening post ?
I don't think your little campaign has a chance in hell, but feel free to waste the time trying...
Edit: Let's make a little wager. If Bush is out by July 1, I will not post on RHP forums for one month. If Bush remains in power, then you will not post on RHP forums for one month. Deal?
Originally posted by flyUnitynot t rue; as you know this pres has the lowest popularity of any 2nd termer in recent history, and the results in Iraq speak for themselves (as the insurgents continue to exercise their democratic rights to attempt to evict the occupiers)
ok, I see your point, Im just trying to get in Stangs head that the majority of Amercans and Iraqis Favor Bush,
Originally posted by clive59You can't blame him for trying.
not t rue; as you know this pres has the lowest popularity of any 2nd termer in recent history, and the results in Iraq speak for themselves (as the insurgents continue to exercise their democratic rights to attempt to evict the occupiers)