@wajoma saidYes. Yes it is.
It's not the role of goobermint to protect people from their own stupid choices shatmixer.
International treaties, laws, humanity all say so.
What you mean to say is that you don’t think that’s the role of government, because you think government is only there to protect property.
And that’s why you are a moron.
2 edits
@wajoma saidI don't even think either of those are choices, jackass.
Whoah another clanger from suziman, she associates being stupid with being black or gay.
And that's what I meant. Obviously, you think these are stupid choices, and therefore neither should get protection from government. Like all right-wing blowhards, you can't stand people not like you, so f 'em, isn't that right?
@shavixmir saidIf someone makes a bad choice, anyway you want to define the word choice, the government has absolutely nothing to do with it.
Yes. Yes it is.
International treaties, laws, humanity all say so.
What you mean to say is that you don’t think that’s the role of government, because you think government is only there to protect property.
And that’s why you are a moron.
This sentence stands on its own.....any superfluous comment about 'property' is totally irrelevant. It puts you in the category of people who write 'trump' in every post.
And that is why you are a moron.
@shavixmir saidNo shag doody for brains, the primary role of goobermint is to protect you from me, and me from you. Not you from yourself. If that were the role of goobermint they would make XXXL donkey dick dildos illegal so you couldn't permanently damage your a-hole. You know you're going to end up having to wear adult diapers don't you.
Yes. Yes it is.
International treaties, laws, humanity all say so.
What you mean to say is that you don’t think that’s the role of government, because you think government is only there to protect property.
And that’s why you are a moron.
@suzianne saidYou need to start over. You would do better if you abstain from cute or glib comments, no one understands your points.
I don't even think either of those are choices, jackass.
And that's what I meant. Obviously, you think these are stupid choices, and therefore neither should get protection from government. Like all right-wing blowhards, you can't stand people not like you, so f 'em, isn't that right?
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidhttps://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24371123-supreme-court-ruling-on-razor-wire-at-us-border
SCOTUS orders removing barbed wire. Jesus.
But THIS is the question…..What if The Wall were there?!?! Take it down?
Jesus again.
Why is it so difficult to supply sources?
So there is a still pending case at the 5th Appellate Court: https://unicourt.com/case/pc-ap1-casegk481b81210b45-221693
The Appelate court had issued an order and the supreme court vacated it. Normally such things would be discounted under "legal games". Now weher exactly is the explosive content?
@suzianne saidI'm going to ask politely that may you please quote where I said being melanin enriched was a choice.
I don't even think either of those are choices, jackass.
And that's what I meant. Obviously, you think these are stupid choices, and therefore neither should get protection from government. Like all right-wing blowhards, you can't stand people not like you, so f 'em, isn't that right?
suziman this happens so regularly. You've defined yourself by telling lies to the extent that if you were to tell the truth (provide a quote of my-good-self saying being a bleep is a choice) people would say suziman is not being true to her nature.
Your use of the word 'black' is racist and offensive please use 'bleep' or the afore mentioned 'melanin enriched' in future. Clearly bleeps come in all colors like coffee, chocolate, taupe, khaka so the racist 'black' not only describes an incredibly small minority of bleeps it discriminates against many others.
@wajoma saidUhuh... I ponder if I should even answer you. I mean, it's so obviously wrong that even Australians pauze their kangaroo raping to gape at your stupidity.
No shag doody for brains, the primary role of goobermint is to protect you from me, and me from you. Not you from yourself. If that were the role of goobermint they would make XXXL donkey dick dildos illegal so you couldn't permanently damage your a-hole. You know you're going to end up having to wear adult diapers don't you.
1 edit
@ponderable saidQuick answer, we are all busy, and to suggest searching the internet for sources, which busy people will not click on, is beyond a friendly chat room. This to me is no more than 3 of us sitting at Starbucks or cocktail hour and chatting about the State of the Union, etc.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24371123-supreme-court-ruling-on-razor-wire-at-us-border
Why is it so difficult to supply sources?
So there is a still pending case at the 5th Appellate Court: https://unicourt.com/case/pc-ap1-casegk481b81210b45-221693
The Appelate court had issued an order and the supreme court vacated it. Normally such things would be discounted under "legal games". Now weher exactly is the explosive content?
EG, you might hear Kamala's words yesterday that were dancing all around how to remedy the border situation. A good idea i would say is to build a wall. And go from there. Why would we need to research an answer for such a discussion, in the reams of internet comments? We would be having our own, would we not.?
Would we speak our minds, or someone else's? And it would put me at a disadvantage if you brought up article 19 section 3 or some such....I would not have my cell phone access!! Or on a religion subject, if you pulled out Matthew 3:21, then I woujld have to pull out something to counter it. zzzzzzzzzzzzz
And, again, too busy. Arent we just having fun? Can you honestly say you click on all the links. Are you a hermit in a cabin? Get busy! See the world!!
@ponderable saidActually, the SCOTUS vacating a lower court order while the case is pending in that court is quite unusual. It is generally a strong signal as to their view of the ultimate merits of the case.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24371123-supreme-court-ruling-on-razor-wire-at-us-border
Why is it so difficult to supply sources?
So there is a still pending case at the 5th Appellate Court: https://unicourt.com/case/pc-ap1-casegk481b81210b45-221693
The Appelate court had issued an order and the supreme court vacated it. Normally such things would be discounted under "legal games". Now weher exactly is the explosive content?
@ponderable saidSomeone makes a point on a thread. 'i think that citizens should pay off the loans of other citizens!" I would ask how they can think that, or better, justify that. I would not scream back that they are wrong, and that I think that we should NOT pay the loans. Rather, I want to converse (not like Sue converses) and see what that person thinks. But to read a link!??!!?? What in the hell?
But watching long videos withhout sourcing?
What would this have to do with watching long (any) videos?
@no1marauder saidWe in a law class, are we? Geez.
Actually, the SCOTUS vacating a lower court order while the case is pending in that court is quite unusual. It is generally a strong signal as to their view of the ultimate merits of the case.