Originally posted by boarmanJust what we need, another nut job.😞
Lets agree or disagree, but after watching so much video footage of this , its not possible for both towers to come crashing down like they did from planes hitting them. It was a controlled explosion that brought the towers down and what do we ask of world trade centre builing 7, it had no impact and was still reduced to rubble. Come on citizens of the US, ...[text shortened]... .
The American government has big answers to explain to their public and more so George W Bush,
1 edit
Originally posted by PhlabibitSet your threat level to "severe". This new information has made you a legitimate target. That little kid who knocks on your door next week wearing a mask and saying "trick or treat" could be one of Bin Laden's goons out for revenge. Let him have it with both barrels. Or give him some candy. Either way sooner or later he'll be writhing in agony from a gaping chest wound or tooth decay.
*SLAMS PANIC BUTTON!~
What I do find interesting in all of this is that there was allegedly a great deal of activity in the insurance market relating to airlines and the buildings that were involved. I'm not asaying it was a conspiracy, but the fact that building 7 came down in the same fashion as the twin towers does pose questions, as 7 was a controlled demolition, and if you compare its collapse to the twin towers there was very little difference.
Originally posted by ChessPraxisany country which can kill its own president, could certainly engineer a self inflicted
Just what we need, another nut job.😞
terrorist attack with the sole purpose of utilising it as a pretext for war. The thing of
course to ask is, who profited from it. Instead of simply calling out boarman as a
nutter, why dont you look objectively at any 'evidence', he may present.
1 edit
Originally posted by medullahwho in fact would have profited from the collapse of the twin towers in insurance terms
What I do find interesting in all of this is that there was allegedly a great deal of activity in the insurance market relating to airlines and the buildings that were involved. I'm not asaying it was a conspiracy, but the fact that building 7 came down in the same fashion as the twin towers does pose questions, as 7 was a controlled demolition, and if you compare its collapse to the twin towers there was very little difference.
after its demolition, err, i mean collapse?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI stand corrected, but then I always knew you was a "nutter." 😕
any country which can kill its own president, could certainly engineer a self inflicted
terrorist attack with the sole purpose of utilising it as a pretext for war. The thing of
course to ask is, who profited from it. Instead of simply calling out boarman as a
nutter, why dont you look objectively at any 'evidence', he may present.
It's the complete lack of media coverage and documentaries on the subject that makes me so angry. I have to find out about this on an internet chess forum ? You Americians have a lot to answer for. What else have you faked ? The moon landings ? Janet Jackson's half-time SuperBowl wardrobe malfunction ?
Originally posted by boarmanTB, I'm a Viking too and am here to look you in the eye and to suggest that you calm
Lets agree or disagree, but after watching so much video footage of this , its not possible for both towers to come crashing down like they did from planes hitting them. It was a controlled explosion that brought the towers down and what do we ask of world trade centre builing 7, it had no impact and was still reduced to rubble. Come on citizens of the US, ...[text shortened]... .
The American government has big answers to explain to their public and more so George W Bush,
down and come back to your senses... with the realization that this, too, shall pass.
gb
Originally posted by thaughbaerWas BP behind it? Is it connected with the possible Gulf of Mexico oil spill? Why wouldn't the media allowed ing the area???? Why were NO marsupials harmed?
It's the complete lack of media coverage and documentaries on the subject that makes me so angry. I have to find out about this on an internet chess forum ? You Americians have a lot to answer for. What else have you faked ? The moon landings ? Janet Jackson's half-time SuperBowl wardrobe malfunction ?
Originally posted by expuddlepirate"possible" Gulf of Mexico spill ? Are you saying it didn't happen ? Another conspiracy ? All those birds pretending to be covered in oil and the fish playing dead. I feel such a fool.
Was BP behind it? Is it connected with the possible Gulf of Mexico oil spill? Why wouldn't the media allowed ing the area???? Why were NO marsupials harmed?