Go back
about recommendations

about recommendations

General


-Removed-
Please see my reply to wolfgang59: Thread 163665 (Page 9)


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Please see my reply to wolfgang59: Thread 163665 (Page 9)
a treasure hunt!!!
i get to go clicking to find out what he said!!!

caalloo caallaaaaaaa!!!


Originally posted by rookie54
a treasure hunt!!!
i get to go clicking to find out what he said!!!

caalloo caallaaaaaaa!!!
sorry, it may have been easier to just call you a jerk...


Originally posted by rookie54
a treasure hunt!!!
i get to go clicking to find out what he said!!!

caalloo caallaaaaaaa!!!
Thank you.


Originally posted by rookie54
sorry, it may have been easier to just call you a jerk...
You might enjoy that pic:

http://diyforlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/God-makes-the-world.jpg


Recommended posts are marketed through spin-agencies for booze or small money.
But the real evil are those giving thumbs down. They are ex-members of Stasi and Securitate.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by vandervelde
Recommended posts are marketed through spin-agencies for booze or small money.
But the real evil are those giving thumbs down. They are ex-members of Stasi and Securitate.
And here I thought they were Romans.

1 edit

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
This so reminds me of when I was in grade 3..."I know you are. What am I?".
Now you know what we've been enduring in the Spirituality Forum for the past few months.

I'm glad they brought their shenanigans to a wider audience.

Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
If forums have a purpose then it must follow that forum contributors also have a purpose. Extrapolating on this (and taking into account existentialism and wind resistance) even forum contributors of an 'atheistic persuasion' must, de facto, have purpose in their lives. This being the case, if purpose exists in a world without God, then the existence of a supreme being that brings meaning to humanity is simply not required.

You make a very good argument sir for the atheist camp. We thank you kindly.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
No. Despite years of study, it remains beyond my comprehension.

2 edits

-Removed-
Not the way you guys do it. It's not "discussing and questioning" for you, unless you get busted. It's just plain ol' forum combat. How good can you make yourself look, and how bad can you make the other guy look.

But many of the latest rounds have vastly underrated the intelligence of the audience (not to mention that of the victim). You guys simply aren't as effective as you think you are. But that doesn't stop the "nasty". 15 pages of "back and forth" later, the thread topic is usually a forgotten memory.

But maybe you're right. By using the term "shenanigans", perhaps I was being too nice. I have to come up with a much harsher term. Ok, how about "endless interrogation"? How about the "third degree"? Sometimes you guys are like Laurence Olivier's character in Marathon Man.

"Is it safe?"

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ponderable
You might enjoy that pic:

http://diyforlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/God-makes-the-world.jpg
Haha, I loved The Far Side. I think most of those 'jerks' landed at Home Depot. 🙂

1 edit

Originally posted by Suzianne
It's just plain ol' forum combat. How good can you make yourself look, and how bad can you make the other guy look.
One could take a look at 10 pages of your own posting history at random to get a crystal clear illustration of what you're accusing others of here.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.