@fmf saidIn your case sir, the assumption wasn't wrong.
I am at worst guilty of nothing more than a wrong assumption, not a lie.
The same goes for your "hissy fit" about the pseudonym issue in which I exhibited no malice. You are also guilty of acting maliciously as a result of your wrong assumption.
@fmf saidPrior to the name change, you had grumbled in the forums about the effort you had put in to narrating my stories, as though I was undeserving. (After we had fallen out). At that time you were short of writers, and due to having already recorded my stories begrudgingly included them in the broadcasts. I think messing with my name and ensuring I didn't know about it until it went live was your vindictive pettiness.
No serious person can suggest that my use of a spoonerism for a pseudonym was me "intentionally being as vindictive as possible"
@fmf saidI've given you a 2nd opinion.
As a mental health practitioner, do you endorse Very Rusty and Woofwoof's "banter"?
But, you're free to Doctor-shop until your hair turns blue.
Just know that; the pathetic face in the mirror will always remain, negatively perched and searching until you actively seek to dispel it.
Striving for psychological balance takes honesty and effort and I doubt your will to commit to either.
😔
@ghost-of-a-duke saidMe? Banter about mental illness and suggesting people "get professional help"? No Never. You're thinking of the likes of Kevin Eleven, josephw and PB1002 and others.
Isn't that the same banter you have previously been involved with yourself, especially in the SF?
1 edit
@fmf saidI don't know about that. Pretty sure you've directed such things to Kelly or Sonship.
Me? Banter about mental illness and suggesting people "get professional help"? No Never. You're thinking of the likes of Kevin Eleven, josephw and PB1002 and others.
Edit: If it turned out those comments were made by Dive rather than yourself, would you condemn him for it?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo. Not me. Never.
I don't know about that. Pretty sure you've directed such things to Kelly or Sonship.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidPrior to the name change, you had grumbled in the forums about the effort you had put in to narrating my stories, as though I was undeserving.
Prior to the name change, you had grumbled in the forums about the effort you had put in to narrating my stories, as though I was undeserving. (After we had fallen out). At that time you were short of writers, and due to having already recorded my stories begrudgingly included them in the broadcasts. I think messing with my name and ensuring I didn't know about it until it went live was your vindictive pettiness.
This is not true.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAt that time you were short of writers, and due to having already recorded my stories begrudgingly included them in the broadcasts.
At that time you were short of writers, and due to having already recorded my stories begrudgingly included them in the broadcasts. I think messing with my name and ensuring I didn't know about it until it went live was your vindictive pettiness.
This isn't true. I had a stack of stories by Bill and myself, with light-hearted pseudonyms at the ready.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidSure. Show me where he used banter about mental illness and I will condemn it.
If it turned out those comments were made by Dive rather than yourself, would you condemn him for it?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think messing with my name and ensuring I didn't know about it until it went live was your vindictive pettiness.
Prior to the name change, you had grumbled in the forums about the effort you had put in to narrating my stories, as though I was undeserving. (After we had fallen out). At that time you were short of writers, and due to having already recorded my stories begrudgingly included them in the broadcasts. I think messing with my name and ensuring I didn't know about it until it went live was your vindictive pettiness.
No. You are mistaken. A PM before you sent the sabotage letter would have set you straight.